Challenging Opinions >>

Challenging Opinions >>

Download on the App Store

Challenging Opinions >> episodes

  • CO118 Andrew Branca on Gun Law

    Andrew Branca is a lifelong NRA member, a lawyer who consults on self-defence law and the author of The Law of Self Defense: The Indispensable Guide to the Armed Citizen.



    During our discussion, I metioned the Dickey Amendment, which forbids the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from advocating or promoting gun control, but has widely been interpreted as preventing the CDC from studying the health effects of gun ownership.







    I also mentioned sutdies that show that owning a gun does not reduce the chance of being the victim of a gun attack, and that gun ownership is not associated with a reduction in crime.



    *****



    Back in episode
    107, I talked to David Dayen on the Economics of vaping, particularly the
    huge expansion in the market reach and the valuation of the market leader,
    Juul.



    At the time we noted that Juul say that
    they are a healthier alternative to smoking, that even if it isn’t healthy, it
    is healthier. They are saving people
    from the worst effects of their addiction. But the suspicion was that, although
    they denied it, rather than reducing the number of smokers, they are targeting
    children to expand the number of people addicted to nicotine.



    Some information that has been uncovered
    since then doesn’t exactly reassure the people who might have doubted their
    word. Documents presented to the House Oversight Subcommittee on Economic and
    Consumer Policy show just what Juul has been doing to not target children with
    their products.



    Let’s be clear here – the suspicion is that
    Juul, now owned by the same company that makes Marlboro cigarettes – is trying
    to get children addicted to nicotine before they can make a mature decision as
    to whether that is something they want in their life. Research shows that
    almost all smokers who get addicted to nicotine do so before the age of 18, and
    the small portion who take up smoking as adults a...
    42 min
  • CO117 Will Wilkinson on Community and Ideology

    Will Wilkinson is the vice president for research at the Niskanen Center.



    He’s also and a contributing opinion writer for the New York Times. He was previously, a correspondent for The Economist and a research fellow at the Cato Institute.







    We discussed his research paper The Density Divide: Urbanization, Polarization, and Populist Backlash.



    *****



    Most of you won’t have listened to a radio
    service called Voice of America, and
    there’s a good reason for that. Actually, it’s not just radio any more; they
    describe themselves as a multi-media service. And it’s owned and funded by the
    US government. So why haven’t you heard it? Because that’s not allowed.



    Not to say that you’re not allowed to tune
    in, but they, VOA as they’re known, aren’t allowed to broadcast to you. In the
    good old days of shortwave radio broadcasts, that meant that they would aim
    their broadcasts at other countries, never at the USA. The main targets were Central
    and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia, and the Middle East,
    and their job was to promote the American point of view. It’s a propaganda
    station.



    They’ve never really been that successful,
    they don’t have the brand recognition that the BBC World Service has, certainly
    not the level of trust. Like their Cold War competitors Radio Moscow, they had
    a pretty heavy-handed bias that undermined their credibility.



    By the way, you shouldn’t confuse Voice of
    America with Voice of Europe, which is a clickbait conspiracy website. Anyway,
    the reason that VOA isn’t aimed at you, even though you can hear it if you
    really want to, is because the US constitution is a bit sniffy about the
    39 min
  • CO116 Raymond Ibrahim on Islam and the West

    Raymond Ibrahim is the author of Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War Between Islam and the West.



    *****



    Let’s do a bit of science.



    Maybe, like me, you have had various social
    media invaded by people making all sorts of complaints about something called
    5G. That’s the newest mobile data standard. Unless you are really special, that
    doesn’t work on your phone yet, but the networks are being installed, and newer
    handsets using them will be available soon, probably starting at the top end of
    the price range.







    5G just means the fifth generation, the
    first was basic cellphones, the second was text messaging, 4G allows internet,
    and 5G will allow you to control the space shuttle, or something. If you click
    too far into Facebook or YouTube, you’d be forgiven for thinking that an apocalypse
    was planned, something between the worst nightmares of the antivaxxers and
    those people who say that their thoughts are controlled by the CIA via a chip
    in their brain. So I really just want to give the basic scientific information
    here.



    5G is data transmitted over radio waves.
    Just like any other form of data transmitted through the air, cellphone voice
    or data signals, FM radio, broadcast TV or your home wifi. All of them are,
    technically, radiation. So is light – by which I mean the light that your eyes
    use to see things around you, and so are magnetic waves, the ones that spin the
    needle on a compass.



    Some conspiracy theorists have been saying
    vague things that imply that 5G uses some weird special type of radiation that
    is dangerous or untested. In reality, 5G uses frequencies that are already in
    use by home wifi systems and digital TV broadcasts. Sure, the content of that
    signal is new technology, but the content of the signal has no relevance to the
    frequency it’s broadcast on.



    So where does that all collide with radiation that we know can kill us? Basically, the electromagnetic spectrum is split in two halves – ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation is basically too weak t...
    37 min
  • CO115 John Hawkins on Politicized Data

    John Hawkins is a writer for Bizpaq review, Brass Pills and is the editor Right Wing News. He’s also the author of 101 Things All Young Adults Should Know.







    We talked about John’s article The Best Stats & Quotes From ‘Alienated America: Why Some Places Thrive While Others Collapse’, John’s take on the findings of that book. I mentioned the fact that the number of hours needed to work at minimum age to pay college tuition has increased about tenfold in the last 40 years, and the book Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam.







    Here is the comparison between the minimum wage and average university tuition costs:







    And this are the changes since 1979 in average wages, the wages of the top one per cent, and productivity.











    *****



    If, when I say TikTok, your mind goes to a
    clock, then you are not in the demographic for TikTok.



    TikTok is a video-sharing app, with a very
    young demographic. It’s got something approaching a billion users, and that’s
    not counting the users of a parallel app in China called Douyin, which is
    basically identical, except firewalled off, to comply with Chinese censorship
    laws.



    To put that in context, Facebook took
    almost eight years to get to a billion users. TikTok won’t be three years old
    until September.



    The videos are limited to 15 seconds in
    duration, and as you might expect they normally center on music and youth
    culture. If you want to feel old, download it and swipe through a few videos.
    Users who get more than 1,
    42 min
  • CO114 Greg Shupak on Reporting the Conflict

    Greg Shupak has a PhD in Literary Studies and teaches Media Studies at the University of Guelph in Toronto. He regularly writes analysis of politics and media for outlets including Electronic Intifada, In These Times, Jacobin, and the website Fairness and accuracy in reporting.







    His book, The Wrong Story Palestine, Israel, And The Media is available from OR Books.



    *****



    That’s audio from an Egyptian news channel called Extra news, it’s in Arabic of course. That clip is 17 seconds long, and it’s a news item that, in Arabic, contained 42 words. As I understand it, it was broadcast only once on Extra News, the exact same number of times that it was broadcast on all other Egyptian news channels.



    And with the exact same text. To the word.
    And, every Egyptian newspaper ran the same story, 42 words long, word for word.



    The news was about the death of Mohamed
    Morsi. Morsi was the first, and so far only, democratically elected president
    of Egypt. He won the 2012 elections after the Tahrir Square protests,
    part of the Arab
    Spring uprising and that swept through the Arab world nearly a decade ago
    now.



    The Arab Spring was a protest by a mixture
    of people, democrats, liberals, economic reformists, and Islamists who were
    against the corrupt elites that ruled – and in many cases still rule – the Arab
    countries. The Egyptian army, the real controlling force in the country, saw
    the way things were going, deposed the longtime dictator, and allowed largely
    free elections.



    They didn’t go to script. Morsi led the Freedom
    and Justice Party, and organization affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
    The party weren’t Islamic extremists, they confirmed that they were happy for
    women and Egypt’s minority Christians to serve in government, but they were by
    no means what people who wanted Egypt to move towards the western democratic
    model would have hoped for,
    37 min
  • CO113 Mark Vernon on the Secret History of Christianity

    Mark Vernon is a psychotherapist and writer, with a degree in physics, before two degrees in theology, and a PhD in philosophy. He’s written books covering subjects from friendship and belief, to wellbeing and love.







    His next book, A Secret History of Christianity, is published at the end of August by John Hunt publishing .



    *****



    It’s worth paying attention to what’s been
    happening in Hong Kong.



    In case you don’t know, Hong Kong was a
    tiny British colony, it’s one of the most densely populated places in the world,
    even though still keeps some rural areas; it crams its people into a city that
    uses every square centimeter to the utmost.



    In 1898, Britain obtained a 99-year lease on
    what’s called the New Territories, and those of you who are quick at math will
    have worked out that in 1997, they had to hand the territory back to the
    by-then-communist China.



    But Hong Kong was a roaring capitalist
    success story, and China didn’t want to go killing any golden-egg-laying geese,
    so Deng Xiaoping agreed a form of government called one country, two
    systems. Basically, that meant that China would remain a communist
    dictatorship, Hong Kong would remain a mostly-democratic and totally capitalist
    territory, with a strong independent judiciary, even though Beijing would have
    ultimate sovereignty.



    Don’t get starry-eyed about this, many of
    the elected officials know that they can take democratic principles so far and
    no further. The rule of law is much stronger and politics and the media are
    much, much freer in Hong Kong than in China, but that freedom is tempered in
    part by a knowledge that if they exercise it too much, it might not last.



    One example was the case of the staff of
    Causeway Bay Books; this was a Hong Kong bookstore that sold books about
    mainland Chinese politics which would be strictly ba...
    0 min
  • CO112 Justin Strekal on Legalizing Marijuana

    Justin Strekal political director at Norml.



    *****



    I mentioned last week that I would talk
    about the earthquake – earthquakes really – in UK politics. In particular that
    Nigel Farage’s new party, the Brexit Party won the European
    Parliament elections in the UK by a mile last month.







    They did win by a mile, but it’s important
    not to get carried way. They won by getting 30 per cent of the vote. That was
    way more than any other party, but of course nothing like a majority, and a
    fair way below what was predicted by pollsters. But it has still upended
    politics, and let’s not forget that was a stunning result for a party that was
    only a month old.



    But that only tells half the story. The
    party that came second was the Liberal Democrats – a centrist party, very
    pro-European. They got a huge increase in their normally tiny vote with a very
    simple slogan. Stop Brexit – Vote LibDem.
    Third came the opposition Labour party, and fourth came the Green Party. Have
    you noticed what’s missing? The Conservative Party, Theresa May’s party, the
    government party, came fifth. She got less than nine per cent of the vote.



    But that’s the European Parliament elections,
    a second-order election, a chance for the voters to let fly, it’s probably
    going to have no effect at all and the turnout was low, so we can safely ignore
    the result – right? Not quite.



    Opinion
    polls for UK government elections have taken a decisive turn. The Brexit
    Party doesn’t do so well; it’s still doing impressively, but the real story is
    how British Politics have been totally upended.



    The Liberal Democrats are in first place in
    the polls for the real, grown-up election, for a British parliament, with the
    Brexit Party in second place, and Labour and the Conservatives coming third and
    fourth. In a US context, that’s a bit like the Libertarian Party and the Green
    0 min
  • CO111 Bruce Schneier on Cybersecurity

    Bruce Schneier is a public-interest technologist. He’s been writing about security issues for more than 20 years, and he’s a Special Advisor to IBM Security, a fellow and lecturer at Harvard’s Kennedy School, and a board member of Electronic Frontier Foundation.



    *****



    A couple of quite similar stories caught my
    eye in the past while.



    The first was about a German MP
    called Markus Frohnmaier. He was elected to the Bundestag, the German
    parliament for the far-right AfD party in 2017.







    A consortium of journalists from the BBC, German
    news magazine Der Spiegel, and TV station ZDF and the Italian La Repubblica
    newspaper got a leaked email from Petr Premyak, a former Russian spy who is
    also a former member of the Russian parliament. The email, which Premyak
    confirmed is genuine, but says he didn’t draft, was sent a couple of months
    before Frohnmaier was elected.



    It contains a document assessing the state
    of public opinion in Germany and analyzing how to influence it in favor of
    Russia.



    It also refers to Markus Frohnmaier. Frohnmaier,
    for a bit of background is quite young, only 28 now; he was 26 when he was
    elected to parliament.  He has very frequently
    spoken against the EU sanctions on Russia imposed after the invasion of areas
    of Ukraine; he has also made trips to Crimea, the Ukrainian territory illegally
    annexed by Russia in 2014, and to areas of eastern Ukraine controlled by
    pro-Russian separatists and Russian special forces.



    The leaked document says that Frohnmaier is
    – quote “our own absolutely controlled” politician, and it goes on to predict –
    rightly as it turned out – that he had a good chance of getting elected, and
    discusses how Russian money could be used to him get elected.



    The second
    story is about Austria’s FPÖ party. They’re one of the most successful
    far-right parties in Europe; they are in coalition government with that
    country’s conservative party. Or they were, until a secretly-recorded video of Heinz-Chris...
    0 min
  • CO110 Grayson Quay on Another View on MeToo

    Grayson Quay is a freelance writer. His work has been published in The Washington Times, Reason.com, National Interest, Townhall and others. He is also MA candidate at Georgetown University Master’s Degree candidate.
    0 min
  • CO109 Aaron Naparstek on the War on Cars

    Aaron Naparstek is a cohost of the War on Cars podcast, and also the founder of Streetsblog.org.



    *****



    There have been a couple of stories about
    facial recognition. This audio is from a BBC
    report where the police set up a van with cameras filming passersby and
    searching for records on them based on facial recognition. One man decided that
    he didn’t like that, and pulled his sweater up over his mouth and nose to
    frustrate the camera system; the police stopped him, forced him to be
    photographed, and fined him £90, about $115 for what they called disorderly
    conduct.







    There was no suggestion that he was guilty
    of any crime, at least of any other crime, if you call not wanting to be filmed
    a crime.



    This was a trial, the police brought a BBC
    camera crew along with them to film the demonstration, and it was notable that
    three other people were arrested when the cameras, and the associated computer
    system recognized them as people who had outstanding warrants against them.



    Compare that to the
    story another British man, this time in the French port city of Calais who
    will go on trial shortly for an incident that started when police noticed that
    he was filming them. He says that the police attacked a woman he was with
    without provocation; the two of them were recording police behavior.



    There is an ongoing dispute at migrant
    camps around Calais, where volunteers distributing food to migrants say that
    they are suffering intense harassment from the French police. Amnesty
    International have said that the charges are an abuse of process, and should be
    dropped. The man faces large fines and up to five years in prison if he is
    convicted.



    This has echoes of the Glik v Cunniffe case
    in the United States, where the Supreme Court ruled that citizens have the right
    to film public officials, including police, who are working in public. There is
    0 min

About Challenging Opinions >>

From the publisher's feed

the podcast where ideas are tested