
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Are trade shows still worth attending when buyers can search for suppliers through Alibaba, Google, ChatGPT, and other online platforms?
For physical products, Renaud Anjoran believes they still offer considerable value, provided buyers arrive with a clear objective and understand how to assess the companies they meet.
In this listener Q&A episode, Adrian and Renaud answer Robert C’s question about events such as the Canton Fair, Global Sources, CES, and IFA.
00:00:10 – Introduction and Robert’s listener question
00:01:19 – Are trade shows still worth attending?
00:03:40 – Why in-person trade shows can beat online supplier searches
00:04:53 – Spotting trends and avoiding undifferentiated products
00:07:18 – Why an impressive booth proves very little
00:09:06 – Questions buyers should ask potential suppliers
00:09:32 – How to avoid being seen as a “tire kicker”
00:11:35 – Researching exhibitors before attending the show
00:14:11 – Manufacturer or trading company?
00:15:00 – In-house capabilities, customer fit, and production capacity
00:16:52 – How suppliers judge visitors at their booths
00:18:21 – How to present your company as a credible prospect
00:20:12 – Realistic forecasts, order values, and exaggerated promises
00:21:48 – Why the maturity of your product design matters
00:23:16 – Discussing first-order MOQs and longer-term volumes
00:24:39 – Final advice and the Agilian factory-tour series - watch the tour videos here
Found some possible suppliers? We can help check them:
Adrian revisits a classic episode (originally Ep. 30, Nov 2020) in this monthly rewind, Episode 333 of China Manufacturing Decoded, and sits down with Sofeast CEO, Renaud, to unpack the three types of quality-control (QC) plans every importer and manufacturer should agree before production starts.
Renaud explains three types of QC plans:
Key takeaways for listeners: QC planning is a pre-production activity not a rescue job; define a clear product quality standard; decide how quality will be controlled during production; and for any new product, agree on what must be proven before mass production. If any of those points are unclear, that’s likely where your next quality risk is hiding.
Setting up a new factory is a major strategic decision. It is not just about finding cheaper land, moving away from China, or following other companies into Vietnam, Mexico, or another popular manufacturing location.
In this episode, Renaud speaks with David Collins, CEO of Manufacturing Transformation Group, about what companies need to think through before relocating production or building their own factory.
They discuss why more companies are considering factory relocation or ownership again, especially after COVID, tariff changes, supplier dependency, and IP concerns. But David explains why the first question should not be “where should we move?” It should be “what are we actually trying to accomplish?”
The conversation covers the real trade-offs between China, Vietnam, Mexico, and other locations; why labour cost should not be the only driver; how supplier location, workforce skills, logistics, and infrastructure affect the decision; and why companies need a proper BOM, cost model, and feasibility study before making a move.
They also get into greenfield vs brownfield factory projects, equipment selection, factory layout, commissioning, factory acceptance testing, and why automation can be a waste of money if it does not fit the real production process.
The key message: moving to a new factory is a rare chance to redesign your manufacturing system properly. But if you simply copy the same poor layout, weak supply chain, bad inventory habits, and unsuitable equipment into a new building, you may just move the mess.
00:00 – Introduction: setting up a new factory
In this episode of China Manufacturing Decoded, Adrian is joined by Paul Adams, Head of New Product Development at the Sofeast Group's contract manufacturer Agilian Technology, to discuss one of the most common assumptions hardware founders make before moving into tooling: that tooling will take “8 to 12 weeks.”
Paul explains why that figure can be true in very simple cases, but why it is often misleading for real consumer electronics, IoT, and hardware products. Tooling timelines depend on design readiness, DFM review, part complexity, steel selection, toolmaker capacity, customer responsiveness, and the timing of Chinese holidays such as Chinese New Year and Golden Week.
They also discuss why the tooling clock does not really start when the purchase order is placed, why T0, T1, and T2 trials need to be planned carefully, and why founders should build schedule buffers before cutting steel.
For hardware startups and product teams preparing for injection molding, metal stamping, die casting, or other production tooling, this episode explains how to build a more realistic tooling schedule and avoid costly launch delays.
Episode 330 of China Manufacturing Decoded features hosts Adrian and Renaud from the Sofeast Group discussing why quality control should not start when finished products come off the production line. By then, many key decisions have already been made: product requirements, supplier selection, component choices, tooling, process setup, inspection methods, and testing plans.
In this episode, Adrian and Renaud explain what quality control should look like during the NPI process, before mass production begins. They discuss why final inspection is only one part of the quality picture, how clear product requirements reduce confusion, why supplier and component qualification matter, and how process controls, inspection points, test methods, jigs, fixtures, and pilot runs help prevent defects before they become expensive production problems.
You’ll learn why quality needs to be built into the product and manufacturing process from the start, rather than being inspected in at the end.
The main takeaway: final inspection may catch problems, but it does not prevent them. Good NPI quality control reduces risk earlier, when changes are easier and cheaper to make.
Why do some working prototypes still fail when they reach production?
This is episode 329 and the second part of our discussion on this topic, and Adrian and Paul move from the general prototype-to-production gap into real-world failure patterns that can derail a product launch. They look at 3 common scenarios:
You’ll hear why a cheaper component that looks identical on paper can still cause major problems, why every firmware change needs to be tested and documented, and why a factory transfer should never be treated as a simple handover.
The episode also explains how a structured NPI/MPI process, production-representative builds, configuration control, phase gates, pilot runs, and factory process audits help reduce the risk of production failure.
The key message: a prototype proves the concept, but production proves the process. Before approving production, you need to know exactly what was validated, what configuration it applied to, and what has changed since.
Get help with your project from Sofeast. These services cover the topics discussed today:
A prototype works. The team signs it off. Everyone feels confident.
Then production starts, and unexpected failures appear.
Why does this happen?
In this episode, Adrian is joined by Paul Adams, the Sofeast Group's Head of New Product Development, to discuss the gap between prototype and production. This is part one of a two-part discussion on why working prototypes can still fail once products move toward mass production.
Paul explains why prototypes and production units are often not the same thing, even when they look identical. The episode covers five areas where important changes can creep in:
The key point is simple:
A prototype proves the concept. Production proves the process.
Understanding that difference helps hardware teams, product developers, and importers avoid painful surprises when moving from a successful prototype to production.
In part two, next week, we’ll continue the discussion by looking at common real-world failure patterns, including component swaps, firmware tidy-ups, factory transfers, and how a structured NPI process helps close the gap.
Host Adrian revisits episode 49 (a ‘gold episode’ originally recorded in 2021), a topic that still catches many product developers and importers by surprise: non-recurring engineering costs, often shortened to NRE costs.
These are the one-time costs needed to get a new product ready for production, such as engineering work, product design, prototyping, tooling, supplier sourcing, reliability testing, compliance testing, testing fixtures, and production setup.
If you underestimate NRE costs, your product plan may look profitable on paper but fall apart before launch. This episode explains what NRE costs are, why they can grow quickly, where they appear in different manufacturing processes, and how to protect yourself with better planning, supplier due diligence, and the right development agreements.
In episode 236, we explore why so many hardware products never make it to market, even when the idea is strong, the team is ready, and the budget is there.
In this episode of China Manufacturing Decoded, your host Adrian is joined by Paul Adams from Agilian, part of the Sofeast Group, to break down the real reasons hardware projects stall before they even start, and what you can do to avoid it.
They go beyond theory and share practical lessons from real projects, including costly mistakes around missing specifications, bad assumptions, and external pressure to move too fast.
You’ll learn:
The goal of this episode is to help you avoid delays, wasted budget, and failed launches when you're launching your product.
🎧 Listen now and make sure your next product is built on solid ground.
Some product manufacturers treat launch as the end of the journey. It isn’t.
In episode 325 of China Manufacturing Decoded, Adrian and Renaud break down a powerful idea from Tony Fadell: “Builders build, ship, then solve what breaks.”
They explore what really happens after a product hits the market, and why chasing perfection before launch can actually kill your chances of success.
You’ll learn:
Developing a new product in 2026? You'll have food for thought from this one!
From the publisher's feed

112,302 Listeners

2,538 Listeners