Episode 57. September 11, 2020

CLP Topic Category: Destruction of the Nation.

Title: Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse.

Our podcast today is titled Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse, and places the arrest and prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse into the bigger framework of Marxist Critical Legal Theory that guides the behavior of the Marxist judges and prosecutors that Soros has funded.

We use the Rittenhouse event as an example in our analytical framework to describe the links between the BLM riots and funding from Soros, which is designed to end the American judicial system of individual natural rights.

Diagram 1. Analytical Model of Soros Political Influence.

In Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the concept of individual justice is replaced by the concept of group identity social justice. Rittenhouse is being prosecuted as a white supremacist, not as an individual citizen.

The Rittenhouse prosecution of first degree murder is based upon the false premise that Rittenhouse is guilty, before the fact, because he is deemed by Marxist prosecutors to be a white supremacist.

The premise of white supremacy is a tenet in Systemic Judicial Black Racism, a sub-category of Marxist Critical Legal Theory, promoted by state and local Marxist prosecutors who have been elected to office through funding by Soros, in order to seek revenge for slavery and systemic racism.

In the bigger picture, Soros prefers a global, one-world government, managed by elites, like himself. He believes that independent sovereign nation states are obsolete, and should be replaced by a unified totalitarian global government.

In order to replace sovereign nation states, Soros believes that the concept of “individual rights” is archaic, and should be replaced by group collectivism, similar to the social structure of Communist China.

Soros derives his anti-individual, globalist philosophy from his interpretation of Karl Popper’s work on skepticism and rationalism. 

Soros’ interpretation of Popper is terribly flawed and contains an irreconcilable philosophical contradiction, related to Popper’s concept of the “open society.”

We explain that Soros’ misinterpretation of Popper allows him to promote Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the antithesis of Popper’s theory of the open society.

Soros’ interpretation of Popper’s open society is ass-backwards. He is so morally arrogant as to believe that he, himself, has the sole moral authority to overturn the American individualist principles of Hobbes and Locke.

Soros’ one-man crusade to eradicate American individualism is fueled by his $24 billion of family wealth, which he directs to pursue his phantom philosophical goals of a one-world government.

A much better philosophical fit for Soros’ moral arrogance is Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s explanation of the will to power. In this context, the Soros attempt to impose his model of human society on American citizens, is through the strength of his personality and the use of his wealth.

Following Nietzsche, Soros is obsessed with his individual creative powers to overcome the social, cultural and moral defects that he perceives in American individualism, in pursuit of his global collectivist values.

Soros’ pursuit of the untried and empirically untested globalist vision is a profound misstatement of Popper’s philosophy of scientific truth through falsification. Soros’ one-man effort to create a global collectivist society can neither be falsified, via Popper, nor tested, via scientific rationalism.

The actions of Marxist prosecutors in America, elected by funding from Soros, contradict every tenet of Popper’s open society.

For common citizens, there is no exit from the perpetual straight jacket tyranny of global Marxism, which is the ultimate goal of a faux dictator, like Soros. Once the Marxists gain power, there will no longer be a democratic concept of “consent of the governed,” to deploy in order to escap

Episode 57. September 11, 2020

CLP Topic Category: Destruction of the Nation.

Title: Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse.

Our podcast today is titled Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse, and places the arrest and prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse into the bigger framework of Marxist Critical Legal Theory that guides the behavior of the Marxist judges and prosecutors that Soros has funded.

We use the Rittenhouse event as an example in our analytical framework to describe the links between the BLM riots and funding from Soros, which is designed to end the American judicial system of individual natural rights.

Diagram 1. Analytical Model of Soros Political Influence.

In Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the concept of individual justice is replaced by the concept of group identity social justice. Rittenhouse is being prosecuted as a white supremacist, not as an individual citizen.

The Rittenhouse prosecution of first degree murder is based upon the false premise that Rittenhouse is guilty, before the fact, because he is deemed by Marxist prosecutors to be a white supremacist.

The premise of white supremacy is a tenet in Systemic Judicial Black Racism, a sub-category of Marxist Critical Legal Theory, promoted by state and local Marxist prosecutors who have been elected to office through funding by Soros, in order to seek revenge for slavery and systemic racism.

In the bigger picture, Soros prefers a global, one-world government, managed by elites, like himself. He believes that independent sovereign nation states are obsolete, and should be replaced by a unified totalitarian global government.

In order to replace sovereign nation states, Soros believes that the concept of “individual rights” is archaic, and should be replaced by group collectivism, similar to the social structure of Communist China.

Soros derives his anti-individual, globalist philosophy from his interpretation of Karl Popper’s work on skepticism and rationalism. 

Soros’ interpretation of Popper is terribly flawed and contains an irreconcilable philosophical contradiction, related to Popper’s concept of the “open society.”

We explain that Soros’ misinterpretation of Popper allows him to promote Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the antithesis of Popper’s theory of the open society.

Soros’ interpretation of Popper’s open society is ass-backwards. He is so morally arrogant as to believe that he, himself, has the sole moral authority to overturn the American individualist principles of Hobbes and Locke.

Soros’ one-man crusade to eradicate American individualism is fueled by his $24 billion of family wealth, which he directs to pursue his phantom philosophical goals of a one-world government.

A much better philosophical fit for Soros’ moral arrogance is Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s explanation of the will to power. In this context, the Soros attempt to impose his model of human society on American citizens, is through the strength of his personality and the use of his wealth.

Following Nietzsche, Soros is obsessed with his individual creative powers to overcome the social, cultural and moral defects that he perceives in American individualism, in pursuit of his global collectivist values.

Soros’ pursuit of the untried and empirically untested globalist vision is a profound misstatement of Popper’s philosophy of scientific truth through falsification. Soros’ one-man effort to create a global collectivist society can neither be falsified, via Popper, nor tested, via scientific rationalism.

The actions of Marxist prosecutors in America, elected by funding from Soros, contradict every tenet of Popper’s open society.

For common citizens, there is no exit from the perpetual straight jacket tyranny of global Marxism, which is the ultimate goal of a faux dictator, like Soros. Once the Marxists gain power, there will no longer be a democratic concept of “consent of the governed,” to deploy in order to escape the tyranny.

We conclude that the election of Black Marxist judicial racists creates permanent social damage that is irreversible and ultimately leads to the end of the individualistic civil society of the United States.

We conclude that the irreconcilable ideological conflicts between Marxists and natural rights conservatives cannot be reconciled under the framework of Madison’s representative republic.

Our podcast today is the introduction of a much longer article, available for free, for one week, at the CLPnewsnetwork.com.

The other sections of the longer article are:

Section 1. The Soros One-Man Crusade to End American Individual Rights.

Section 2. The Soros Political Network of Promoting Marxist Prosecutors.

Section 3. Marxist Legal Theory as Judicial Revenge For White Supremacy.

Section 4. The American Individualist Theory of Equal Rights Versus the Marxist Collectivist Theory of Social Justice.

Section 5. The Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse.

Conclusion: America, As You Know It, Is Over.

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this podcast is a copyrighted production of the Citizens Liberty Party News Network.

Episode 56. August 21, 2020

CLP Topic: Democrat Police State Socialism

What Happens to the Nation if Judge Sullivan is Successful In His Prosecution of General Flynn? Marxist Critical Legal Theory as The Judge, The Jury, and The Prosecution.

Introduction.

Our Citizens Liberty Party News Network podcast today is titled, What Happens to the Nation if Judge Sullivan is Successful In His Prosecution of General Flynn: Marxist Critical Legal Theory as The Judge, The Jury, and The Prosecution.

We explore the significance and political implications of Judge Sullivan’s refusal to grant a dismissal in the Flynn case by placing his behavior into the larger context of systemic judicial black racism.

We argue that judicial black racism is a sub-category of Marxist Critical Legal Logic.

The unifying principle of all Black judicial racists is that the entire American society is governed by “white supremacy,” and that the job of Black lawyers and jurists is to use the judicial system to implement their ideology of communism, in order to eradicate the existing ideology of American individualism.

The term “systemic” is used to mean that the white racism is a permanent institutional part of the American society, which existed before the country was organized.

Because the white racism is systemic, it cannot be eradicated by policy changes.

The only way to get rid of systemic white racism is to eradicate the society and start over, as a communist nation.

The moral logic of the critical legal ideology is provided by a Black Marxist writer for The Atlantic, Ta-Nehisi Coates. In his February 8, 2016, article, he states that his end goal for America is based upon his assumption that communism is a better mode of social organization than individualism.

Oddly, he criticizes another socialist writer, Cedric Johnson, for not supporting reparations, because Johnson is skeptical that reparations would overcome racism.

Coates states,

“Johnson denigrates reparations by asserting that the demands for reparations have not “yielded one tangible improvement in the lives of the majority of African Americans. This is also true of single-payer health care, calls to break up big banks, free public universities, and any other leftist policy that has yet to come to pass. For a program to have effect, it has to actually be put in effect. Why would reparations be any different?”

          Coates states his unverified assumption about the moral superiority of communism by stating that communism would be a better world,

          “white supremacy is a force in and of itself, a vector often           intersecting with class, but also operating independent of it. I think a           world with equal access to safe, quality, and affordable education;           with the right to health care; with strong restrictions on massive wealth accumulation; with guaranteed childcare; and with access to       the full gamut of birth-control, including abortion, would be a better       world.”

Like all Marxists, Coates assumes that he has the moral authority to declare that communism is superior to individualism. Because he possesses moral authority, he, therefore, has the moral arrogance to impose his view on non-socialists.

This perspective of elite superiority to make decisions on behalf of all citizens is common to all forms of Marxism. The common way of stating this proposition is that communist elites know better than the common citizens what is in the best interests of the common citizens.

In Coates’ application, he “knows” that communism is better than individualism, and he is willing to use his superior intellect to impose communism on common citizens.

Whereas, Coates criticizes Johnson for opposing reparations, Coates promotes a communist system that has been implemented, and has failed miserably to improve the lives of common citizens, throughout history.

Paradoxically, for Coates, the evidence in support of reparations does not exist because it has never been trie

Episode 56. August 21, 2020

CLP Topic: Democrat Police State Socialism

What Happens to the Nation if Judge Sullivan is Successful In His Prosecution of General Flynn? Marxist Critical Legal Theory as The Judge, The Jury, and The Prosecution.

Introduction.

Our Citizens Liberty Party News Network podcast today is titled, What Happens to the Nation if Judge Sullivan is Successful In His Prosecution of General Flynn: Marxist Critical Legal Theory as The Judge, The Jury, and The Prosecution.

We explore the significance and political implications of Judge Sullivan’s refusal to grant a dismissal in the Flynn case by placing his behavior into the larger context of systemic judicial black racism.

We argue that judicial black racism is a sub-category of Marxist Critical Legal Logic.

The unifying principle of all Black judicial racists is that the entire American society is governed by “white supremacy,” and that the job of Black lawyers and jurists is to use the judicial system to implement their ideology of communism, in order to eradicate the existing ideology of American individualism.

The term “systemic” is used to mean that the white racism is a permanent institutional part of the American society, which existed before the country was organized.

Because the white racism is systemic, it cannot be eradicated by policy changes.

The only way to get rid of systemic white racism is to eradicate the society and start over, as a communist nation.

The moral logic of the critical legal ideology is provided by a Black Marxist writer for The Atlantic, Ta-Nehisi Coates. In his February 8, 2016, article, he states that his end goal for America is based upon his assumption that communism is a better mode of social organization than individualism.

Oddly, he criticizes another socialist writer, Cedric Johnson, for not supporting reparations, because Johnson is skeptical that reparations would overcome racism.

Coates states,

“Johnson denigrates reparations by asserting that the demands for reparations have not “yielded one tangible improvement in the lives of the majority of African Americans. This is also true of single-payer health care, calls to break up big banks, free public universities, and any other leftist policy that has yet to come to pass. For a program to have effect, it has to actually be put in effect. Why would reparations be any different?”

          Coates states his unverified assumption about the moral superiority of communism by stating that communism would be a better world,

          “white supremacy is a force in and of itself, a vector often           intersecting with class, but also operating independent of it. I think a           world with equal access to safe, quality, and affordable education;           with the right to health care; with strong restrictions on massive wealth accumulation; with guaranteed childcare; and with access to       the full gamut of birth-control, including abortion, would be a better       world.”

Like all Marxists, Coates assumes that he has the moral authority to declare that communism is superior to individualism. Because he possesses moral authority, he, therefore, has the moral arrogance to impose his view on non-socialists.

This perspective of elite superiority to make decisions on behalf of all citizens is common to all forms of Marxism. The common way of stating this proposition is that communist elites know better than the common citizens what is in the best interests of the common citizens.

In Coates’ application, he “knows” that communism is better than individualism, and he is willing to use his superior intellect to impose communism on common citizens.

Whereas, Coates criticizes Johnson for opposing reparations, Coates promotes a communist system that has been implemented, and has failed miserably to improve the lives of common citizens, throughout history.

Paradoxically, for Coates, the evidence in support of reparations does not exist because it has never been tried, whereas the moral superiority of communism is contradicted by the evidence that does exist, wherever it has been tried.

His criticism of Johnson is based upon a distinction among Marxists about the importance of racism versus the Marxist emphasis on capitalist class exploitation.

Coates states,

          “Johnson doesn’t reject reparations because he doesn’t think they           would work, but because he doesn’t believe specific black injury           through racism actually exists. He favors a “more Marxist class- oriented analysis” over the notion of treating “black poverty as       fundamentally distinct from white poverty.”  

Coates continues his criticism of Johnson by stating,        

          “whiteness confers knowable, quantifiable privileges, regardless of           class—much like “manhood” confers knowable, quantifiable           privileges, regardless of race. White supremacy is neither a trick, nor a           device, but one of the most powerful shared interests in American           history.”

For Coates, the most important enemy is White supremacy, not capitalism.

This important distinction between Coates’ emphasis on white supremacy, and Johnson’s Marxist class exploitation is important to understanding Judge Sullivan’s behavior in prosecuting Flynn.

Using Coates’ distinction between Marxism and Black racism, Sullivan would be called a “Black racist,” who uses his judicial position to extract revenge on Flynn, a White supremacist enemy, who is aligned with a White supremacist President, Donald Trump.

Sullivan is not a Marxist, like Johnson, but a Black racist, like Coates.

Sullivan deploys Marxist critical legal theory from the bench to target his White enemies.

We conclude that the ideological differences between Marxist critical legal logic and the legal logic of individual natural rights are irreconcilable.

Coates does not aim at implementing simple universal social programs, as does Johnson, to alleviate racism, he aims at eradicating the entire white supremacist American society, in order to implement his version of communism.

The BLM Handbook on White Supremacy, “me and white supremacy workbook,” explains that white racism is endemic to the functioning of America.

No social programs are capable of alleviating the original sin of slavery and the ensuing mindset of white supremacy.

The BLM Handbook states,

          “The legal abolition of slavery did not abolish the slavemaster’s mindset. People of colour are suffering daily from the effects of     historic and modern colonialism. White supremacy is an ideology, a       paradigm, an institutional system, and a world view that you have         been born into by virtue of your whiteness. I am not talking about the   physical colour of your skin being bad. I am talking about the historic      and modern legislating, societal conditioning and systemic          institutionalising of the construction of whiteness as inherently     superior than people of other races.”

Sullivan, like the other Black judicial racists cited below, is a warrior in the war against natural rights individualism. Their unifying code language is “systemic white supremacy”, as actualized in the violence and riots of Black Lives Matter.

Their target is the eradication of individual rights.

The meting out of justice, for a Black racist, depends on the Black racist  political ideology of the judges, not on the law and the facts.

For example, in one case, the two conservative Republican D. C. Court of Appeals judges who heard the Flynn mandamus appeal, ruled that Sullivan should dismiss the case.

In a concurrent case, the two socialist Democrat D. C. Court of Appeals judges who heard the Judicial Watch mandamus case against Hillary, ruled that Hillary could escape further testimony.

The difference in the judicial opinions in the two cases is based upon the difference between the collectivism of Marxist critical legal theory and the individualism of natural rights law.

Our podcast is the introduction to a much longer article, available at for free for one week.

https://bit.ly/2EyuXcp

 

Our entire historical archive of articles and podcasts is available for an annual subscription of $30.

The other sections in this podcast are:

Section 1. Systemic Judicial Black Racism.

Section 2. The Linkage Between Judicial Systemic Black Racism and Marxist Critical Legal Theory.

Section 3. Sullivan’s Refusal to Dismiss as A Black Judicial Racist.

Conclusion: America, As You Know It, Is Over.

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this podcast is a copyrighted production of the Citizens Liberty Party News Network, for August 24, 2020.

Episode 55. August 14, 2020

CLP Topic Category. Police State Socialism

 

Justice Delayed: What Happens to the Nation if Durham Fails to Prosecute?

Our podcast today is titled, Justice Delayed: What Happens to the Nation if Durham Fails to Prosecute?

We explore three possible reasons behind John Durham’s delay in releasing the report on the Obamagate investigation.

We explain that the delay could be a harmless event, due to the meticulous investigative work of Durham. 

Even though American voters need the results of the report before the November 2020 election, the meticulous, detailed investigation may not be ready by then, and the priority for the DOJ is to do the job right, no matter how long it takes.

We call this first explanation, “No Good Wine Before Its Time.”

The second reason follows the social construction of reality logic of left-wing pundits who claim that the delay is evidence that there is nothing of interest that Durham has found that would warrant prosecution.

In their logic, there is no deep state, and the FBI and CIA did the right thing in their treatment of the Russia collusion investigation. The Durham delay is because there is nothing there to see.

We call this second explanation the “nothing burger” scenario.

Finally, we explain that the targets of the investigation are members of the deep state apparatus, and that Durham and Wray will protect them at all costs, no matter if crimes have been committed.

If Durham were to pursue prosecution, he would be forced to prosecute the leadership of the Democratic Party, including Obama and Biden, and the damage to the deep state would be permanently debilitating for the functioning of the nation’s political and economic systems.

We call this third explanation the “deep state coup protection conspiracy.”

Our podcast agrees with the suspicion of Buck Sexton that Durham will not prosecute the felons in the Obamagate case.

Sexton states,

          “Nobody you or I has ever heard of will be indicted for spygate. The           Durham report will just confirm what we already know in greater detail.           That will be it. Maybe a low level person charged with a minor offense.”

We explain why Sexton’s analysis is the most likely outcome and we explain the consequences of Durham’s inaction for the fate of the Nation.

We begin our podcast today by placing Durham’s investigation into the bigger, political framework of the American crony capitalist system, in the context of the ruling class, offered by Angelo Codevilla.

Codevilla explains that the United States is ruled by a ruling class, which is entirely disconnected from the democratic consent of the governed. We extend his analysis to explain how the Durham investigation fits into what we call the crony capitalist global system.

The ruling class coalition of the crony capitalist class includes 3 components:

The military-industrial complex of corporations who promote wars in order to obtain government largess.

The 5 largest New York banks, operating in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank, to coordinate world financial flows with other central banks.

The unelected deep state agents who coordinate global government policy with the Chinese Communist Party, on behalf of the large corporations.

We begin with 3 observations, or stipulations, that should be obvious to natural rights conservatives when they contemplate the Durham investigation, and one observation that is opaque.

First, it is obvious that there are no common cultural or moral values that bind socialists and conservatives together in a common national mission. The ideological differences are irreconcilable and irresolvable, under the current Constitution.

In the left’s world view, there is no Obamagate, and there is no “Deep State Swamp.”

The conservative view is that Obama perpetrated a silent coup against Trump.

The two views are not reconcilable. The left’s perspective is the predominate perspective of the Swamp, and for Durham to pursue pros

Episode 55. August 14, 2020

CLP Topic Category. Police State Socialism

 

Justice Delayed: What Happens to the Nation if Durham Fails to Prosecute?

Our podcast today is titled, Justice Delayed: What Happens to the Nation if Durham Fails to Prosecute?

We explore three possible reasons behind John Durham’s delay in releasing the report on the Obamagate investigation.

We explain that the delay could be a harmless event, due to the meticulous investigative work of Durham. 

Even though American voters need the results of the report before the November 2020 election, the meticulous, detailed investigation may not be ready by then, and the priority for the DOJ is to do the job right, no matter how long it takes.

We call this first explanation, “No Good Wine Before Its Time.”

The second reason follows the social construction of reality logic of left-wing pundits who claim that the delay is evidence that there is nothing of interest that Durham has found that would warrant prosecution.

In their logic, there is no deep state, and the FBI and CIA did the right thing in their treatment of the Russia collusion investigation. The Durham delay is because there is nothing there to see.

We call this second explanation the “nothing burger” scenario.

Finally, we explain that the targets of the investigation are members of the deep state apparatus, and that Durham and Wray will protect them at all costs, no matter if crimes have been committed.

If Durham were to pursue prosecution, he would be forced to prosecute the leadership of the Democratic Party, including Obama and Biden, and the damage to the deep state would be permanently debilitating for the functioning of the nation’s political and economic systems.

We call this third explanation the “deep state coup protection conspiracy.”

Our podcast agrees with the suspicion of Buck Sexton that Durham will not prosecute the felons in the Obamagate case.

Sexton states,

          “Nobody you or I has ever heard of will be indicted for spygate. The           Durham report will just confirm what we already know in greater detail.           That will be it. Maybe a low level person charged with a minor offense.”

We explain why Sexton’s analysis is the most likely outcome and we explain the consequences of Durham’s inaction for the fate of the Nation.

We begin our podcast today by placing Durham’s investigation into the bigger, political framework of the American crony capitalist system, in the context of the ruling class, offered by Angelo Codevilla.

Codevilla explains that the United States is ruled by a ruling class, which is entirely disconnected from the democratic consent of the governed. We extend his analysis to explain how the Durham investigation fits into what we call the crony capitalist global system.

The ruling class coalition of the crony capitalist class includes 3 components:

The military-industrial complex of corporations who promote wars in order to obtain government largess.

The 5 largest New York banks, operating in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank, to coordinate world financial flows with other central banks.

The unelected deep state agents who coordinate global government policy with the Chinese Communist Party, on behalf of the large corporations.

We begin with 3 observations, or stipulations, that should be obvious to natural rights conservatives when they contemplate the Durham investigation, and one observation that is opaque.

First, it is obvious that there are no common cultural or moral values that bind socialists and conservatives together in a common national mission. The ideological differences are irreconcilable and irresolvable, under the current Constitution.

In the left’s world view, there is no Obamagate, and there is no “Deep State Swamp.”

The conservative view is that Obama perpetrated a silent coup against Trump.

The two views are not reconcilable. The left’s perspective is the predominate perspective of the Swamp, and for Durham to pursue prosecution, he would be fighting against the rising left wing tide.

Second, it is obvious that the two-party system failed to defend individual rights and freedoms from a tyrannical ruling class elite. Both political parties collaborate to extend globalism, and neither party defends the ideology of individual rights.

The two-party system ended in a centralized elite tyranny in Washington, dedicated to using the agencies of government to direct financial benefits to themselves.

Durham does not have the support of either political party to pursue prosecution, he only has the backing of Trump, who does not have a political party of his own.

Third, it is obvious that America’s largest corporations abandoned their allegiance to national sovereignty when they implemented the NAFTA and China trade deals.

It should be obvious that the unifying principle of crony capitalism is globalism, and that Trump’s national sovereignty is a threat to their privileges of crony capitalism.

Even if Trump wins re-election in November, the crony capitalist quest for globalism is not going to disappear.

In other words, we argue that nothing about the deep state, or crony capitalism, will change, even if Trump wins re-election. The two-party political system is systemically dysfunctional and the rule of law ended with the riots and corruption of Obama.

Understanding the connection between the three obvious observations is not difficult.

The Trump election in 2016 de-railed the ruling class march to globalism, and the three parts of the ruling class coalition will never stop their hatred of Trump for disrupting their plans.

Durham’s delay is due to the power of the ruling class, and neither he, nor Barr, is willing to confront their power.

We argue that Durham will not pursue prosecution because the damage that prosecution would do to the Swamp’s decision-making and operations, on a national scale, is permanently debilitating.

The deep state is so extensive, to borrow from Senator Grassley’s opinion, that Durham will not prosecute the agents of the deep state. Rather, both Barr and Durham are collaborators with the Deep State and will protect the felons from prosecution.

The more likely outcome of Durham’s slow-motion inquiry is a detailed report to Barr, after the election, that crimes may have been committed, but that further investigation is needed before pursuing prosecution.

The deep state is betting again, like it did with Hillary in 2016, that the Democrats will win in 2020, and that after November 4, the entire Obamagate investigation will disappear.

Understanding the consequences of Durham’s investigation delay is opaque.

We ask what happens if Durham fails to prosecute the perpetrators of the coup against Trump, including Obama and Biden?

If we are correct that Durham will fail to prosecute, the opaque observation for conservatives, and for the rule of law, is that the United States of America has ended.

Something new must replace the old regime. But, for many conservatives it is unclear, or opaque, what should replace the current regime.

We conclude that Madison’s representative republic should be replaced by a democratic republic, based upon the state sovereignty framework of the Articles of Confederation.

This podcast is the introduction to a much longer article, available for free, for one week at the CLPNewsNetwork.

The other sections of the longer article are:

Section 1. No Good Wine Before Its Time

Section 2. The Left’s Nothing Burger.

Section 3. The Deep State Coup Protection Conspiracy.

Conclusion: America, As You Know It, is Over.

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for August 11, 2020.

The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.

Episode 54. July 24, 2020

CLP Topic Category: Crony Capitalism

 

BLM Marxism and the Emerging Alliance With Global Corporate Crony Capitalism.

 

Introduction.

 

Our podcast today is titled BLM Marxism and the Emerging Alliance With Global Corporate Crony Capitalism and it extends the analysis of Richard D. Wolff, in his Salon article, “How racism became the essential tool for maintaining a capitalist order” by placing BLM Marxism within the conventional Marxist analytical methodology of its critique of capitalism.

In other words, we use Wolff’s standard Marxist class conflict theory to explain that the BLM alliance with crony capitalism is best understood as the capitalist class co-opting BLM with the tool of racism, in order to perpetuate global capitalism.

 

We argue that the recent crony corporate capitalist endorsements of the use of the term “systemic racism” enables the capitalist class to reproduce itself by continually pointing out to BLM that their conditions of oppression are caused by racism, not global crony capitalism.

Wolff notes,

  “Employers (capitalists) played on racialized differences to keep   employees (workers) from unifying against them. The bitter   competition between Black and white  workers acts as a shock-absorber         for cyclically scarce jobs… capitalism fostered and benefited from         racism.”

To paraphrase Wolff, the capitalist class pits Blacks against Whites to act as a shock absorber for the lack of jobs and choice provided under the older form of monopoly capitalism.

Wolff’s Marxian methodology must be updated from the older interpretation of monopoly capitalism to incorporate the newer concepts of global corporate cronyism.

Marxian theory predicted that the older forms of monopoly capitalism had internal contradictions that would, eventually, consign capitalism to the trash heap of history.

We argue that monopoly capitalism has been replaced by crony corporate global capitalism.

The earlier concept of “working class” in monopoly capitalism must be updated to incorporate the group identity ideology that all social groups are exploited by the capitalist class.

In the newer version of crony capitalism, the capitalist class includes all white people, not simply the White cops or the White owners of production capital.

The concept of exploitation and increasing misery of the oppressed groups must be updated to include the newer concept of the neo-slavery of global crony capitalism.

In the neo-slavery of global corporatism, oppressed people have no choice but to submit to the economic choices, including unemployment and poverty, offered by corporations.

The concept of democracy as citizen participation in collective political decisions must be changed to mean equality of incomes, as determined by the elites in the vanguard political party.

With these modifications to traditional Marxist theory, the dialectics of two seemingly incompatible world views, the BLM Marxist view of America as systemically racist, and the crony capitalist view that democratic structures and competitive markets are inferior to a seamless global, totalitarian government, can be more easily reconciled.

The synthesis between the two seemingly incompatible world views is through the joint understanding and agreement by both parties that the Chinese Crony State Communism model represents the best economic model to replace the free enterprise, individualistic model.

The traditional Marxian theory offers both an economic theory of the capitalist’s use of profits obtained through exploitation of the worker, and a theory of history, called the "materialist conception of history.”

The truth of the Marxian historical prediction was never verified because capitalism never died, like Marx predicted. Capitalism kept reinventing itself, and seemed to reincarnate into new forms that defied the Marxian historical prediction.

The reason for the recent failure of historical materialism is that the older monopoly capitali

Episode 54. July 24, 2020

CLP Topic Category: Crony Capitalism

 

BLM Marxism and the Emerging Alliance With Global Corporate Crony Capitalism.

 

Introduction.

 

Our podcast today is titled BLM Marxism and the Emerging Alliance With Global Corporate Crony Capitalism and it extends the analysis of Richard D. Wolff, in his Salon article, “How racism became the essential tool for maintaining a capitalist order” by placing BLM Marxism within the conventional Marxist analytical methodology of its critique of capitalism.

In other words, we use Wolff’s standard Marxist class conflict theory to explain that the BLM alliance with crony capitalism is best understood as the capitalist class co-opting BLM with the tool of racism, in order to perpetuate global capitalism.

 

We argue that the recent crony corporate capitalist endorsements of the use of the term “systemic racism” enables the capitalist class to reproduce itself by continually pointing out to BLM that their conditions of oppression are caused by racism, not global crony capitalism.

Wolff notes,

  “Employers (capitalists) played on racialized differences to keep   employees (workers) from unifying against them. The bitter   competition between Black and white  workers acts as a shock-absorber         for cyclically scarce jobs… capitalism fostered and benefited from         racism.”

To paraphrase Wolff, the capitalist class pits Blacks against Whites to act as a shock absorber for the lack of jobs and choice provided under the older form of monopoly capitalism.

Wolff’s Marxian methodology must be updated from the older interpretation of monopoly capitalism to incorporate the newer concepts of global corporate cronyism.

Marxian theory predicted that the older forms of monopoly capitalism had internal contradictions that would, eventually, consign capitalism to the trash heap of history.

We argue that monopoly capitalism has been replaced by crony corporate global capitalism.

The earlier concept of “working class” in monopoly capitalism must be updated to incorporate the group identity ideology that all social groups are exploited by the capitalist class.

In the newer version of crony capitalism, the capitalist class includes all white people, not simply the White cops or the White owners of production capital.

The concept of exploitation and increasing misery of the oppressed groups must be updated to include the newer concept of the neo-slavery of global crony capitalism.

In the neo-slavery of global corporatism, oppressed people have no choice but to submit to the economic choices, including unemployment and poverty, offered by corporations.

The concept of democracy as citizen participation in collective political decisions must be changed to mean equality of incomes, as determined by the elites in the vanguard political party.

With these modifications to traditional Marxist theory, the dialectics of two seemingly incompatible world views, the BLM Marxist view of America as systemically racist, and the crony capitalist view that democratic structures and competitive markets are inferior to a seamless global, totalitarian government, can be more easily reconciled.

The synthesis between the two seemingly incompatible world views is through the joint understanding and agreement by both parties that the Chinese Crony State Communism model represents the best economic model to replace the free enterprise, individualistic model.

The traditional Marxian theory offers both an economic theory of the capitalist’s use of profits obtained through exploitation of the worker, and a theory of history, called the "materialist conception of history.”

The truth of the Marxian historical prediction was never verified because capitalism never died, like Marx predicted. Capitalism kept reinventing itself, and seemed to reincarnate into new forms that defied the Marxian historical prediction.

The reason for the recent failure of historical materialism is that the older monopoly capitalism, of the 1960s, morphed into global corporate crony capitalism, of the 1990s, which uses state propaganda of systemic racism to direct the benefits of the global economic system to themselves.

In Marxist thought, the “state” is the same thing as the “Swamp.”

Marx explained that the state is a powerful institution of the ruling class that uses the state apparatus to secure obedience to rules and to enforce its preferred relations of production and exploitation.

The economic part of Marxian theory predicted that scientific socialism, at the end of history, would replace monopoly capitalism.

The modern form of scientific socialism is the model of Chinese Communism.

In the socialist logic of social construction of reality, communism, as an ideal end state, already exists in the imaginations of socialists, and it is manifested, or made real, by the existence of Chinese communism.

Marx stated,

          "Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established,           an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the     real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of       this movement result from the premises now in existence".

Communism, as an end state, exists for socialists, in the same way that heaven exists for Christians. In Christian thought, a believer deeply believes in the existence of heaven, but the person must die in order to get to heaven.

In Marxism, BLM Marxists deeply believe that socialism is better than capitalism, but capitalism must die in order to get to communism.

Communist heaven looks like nirvana to socialists. Communist heaven would abolish all exploitation and all social hierarchy.

After the revolution, all social classes would disappear. The state would wither away, as politics ceased to exist.

In communist nirvana, technology would be “inherited” from capitalism, in the same way that the Chinese “inherit U. S. technology,” and the inherited technology would be used to produce plenty for all.

This concept of Chinese communist heaven is the end goal of BLM Marxism.

The two parts of the Marxian theory are in conflict with each other. Capitalism, in materialist history, did not die, and the heaven of scientific socialism, in Marxist economic theory, already exists in the end state of Chinese crony state communism.

The crony capitalist are dangling this concept of Chinese communist heaven in front of the BLM Marxists to co-opt the socialist revolution.

Our podcast today is the introduction to a much longer article, available for free, for one week, at www.clpnewsnetwork.com

The other sections of the longer article include:

Section 1. The Co-option of BLM.

Section 2. The Similarity Between Chinese Crony Communism and American Crony Capitalism.

Section 3. The New World Order of Global Collectism.

Conclusion. The Emerging Global Corporate Crony Capitalism.

The full text and audio of the most recent podcast is available for free at clpnewsnetwork.com. The entire text and audio archive of all the CLP News Network podcasts are available for an annual subscription of $30.

Episode 53. July 10, 2020

CLP  Topic. Democrat Party Socialism

The Right to Work Constitutional Amendment to Reign In North Carolina’s Rogue Lockdown Governor.

Introduction.

Our podcast today is titled The Right to Work Constitutional Amendment to Reign In North Carolina’s Rogue Lockdown Governor and we re-examine North Carolina’s history of tyrannical governors, to gain insight into the lessons of history about how common citizens deal with rogue governors.

The most important lesson is that when the normal legislative channels do not work, and rogue governors ignore the rule of law, common citizens must take matters into their own hands to protect their liberties.

We argue that the citizens must enact a constitutional amendment to clarify the rights of citizens during any future emergency declarations by rogue governors, who may use the emergency powers for political purposes.

We argue that modifying, or amending, the defective Emergency Management Act is insufficient protection of citizen rights.

North Carolina has a vast, overwhelming population of common, working class citizens, and a tiny percentage of social class elites, compared to other states.

North Carolina is unique among the states because of its cultural traditions of radical egalitarianism among common citizens. The cultural value is captured by the phrase “We are as good as anyone. And, anyone is as good as us.”

Part of our cultural heritage is that common citizens applied this egalitarian philosophy to social class aristocrats and royal governors in demanding equal and fair treatment on economic exchange issues.

The rogue governors, then, and now, never appreciated being equated with common citizens, and used violence and fraud to subjugate Black and White common citizens to the elite tyranny.

Part of our egalitarian heritage is derived from the historical fact that North Carolina was initially settled by settlers who were lower class migrants from other states, primarily Virginia. The felons and poor people came to North Carolina to escape elite class tyranny in other states.

For many years, the state’s own historians liked to use the phrase “a sea of humility between two mountains of conceit,” to contrast the common class of citizens in North Carolina with the slaveocracy of Virginia and South Carolina.

On a per capita comparison, North Carolina had many more common farmers and far fewer slave owners than either Virginia or South Carolina.

One of our most honored and highest praise that we can bestow on a citizen is to call the citizen a “yeoman” derived from the tradition of our mountain independent, hard-working farmers.

In general, as a people, we are very slow to anger, and very slow to adopt social change to the status quo. But, when we finally reach our limit of toleration, as a people, we are tenacious in defending out social values.

For many years, historians from outside of North Carolina called the state “the Rip Van Winkle” state because the citizens seemed to slumber through the crises that affected other states.

The Encyclopedia of North Carolina noted,

          “There was general political apathy under the state's Democrat-          controlled one-party system, which resulted in widespread           indifference to all economic, social, and cultural improvements. A           letter writer to the North Carolina Farmer in 1845 voiced his           frustration: "O! that our State, . . . would wake up from her Rip Van           Winkle agricultural sleep!!"

We were the only state, in 1788, that refused, on a matter of principle, to ratify Madison’s new centralized Constitution, until it contained a citizen’s Bill of Rights.

For 3 years after the refusal to ratify, the Federalists inflicted serious economic damage on the citizens, in an attempt to coerce North Carolina into ratifying the defective document.

The citizens of North Carolina were extremely reluctant to join the Confederacy, but once committed to battle, the State sent more s

Episode 53. July 10, 2020

CLP  Topic. Democrat Party Socialism

The Right to Work Constitutional Amendment to Reign In North Carolina’s Rogue Lockdown Governor.

Introduction.

Our podcast today is titled The Right to Work Constitutional Amendment to Reign In North Carolina’s Rogue Lockdown Governor and we re-examine North Carolina’s history of tyrannical governors, to gain insight into the lessons of history about how common citizens deal with rogue governors.

The most important lesson is that when the normal legislative channels do not work, and rogue governors ignore the rule of law, common citizens must take matters into their own hands to protect their liberties.

We argue that the citizens must enact a constitutional amendment to clarify the rights of citizens during any future emergency declarations by rogue governors, who may use the emergency powers for political purposes.

We argue that modifying, or amending, the defective Emergency Management Act is insufficient protection of citizen rights.

North Carolina has a vast, overwhelming population of common, working class citizens, and a tiny percentage of social class elites, compared to other states.

North Carolina is unique among the states because of its cultural traditions of radical egalitarianism among common citizens. The cultural value is captured by the phrase “We are as good as anyone. And, anyone is as good as us.”

Part of our cultural heritage is that common citizens applied this egalitarian philosophy to social class aristocrats and royal governors in demanding equal and fair treatment on economic exchange issues.

The rogue governors, then, and now, never appreciated being equated with common citizens, and used violence and fraud to subjugate Black and White common citizens to the elite tyranny.

Part of our egalitarian heritage is derived from the historical fact that North Carolina was initially settled by settlers who were lower class migrants from other states, primarily Virginia. The felons and poor people came to North Carolina to escape elite class tyranny in other states.

For many years, the state’s own historians liked to use the phrase “a sea of humility between two mountains of conceit,” to contrast the common class of citizens in North Carolina with the slaveocracy of Virginia and South Carolina.

On a per capita comparison, North Carolina had many more common farmers and far fewer slave owners than either Virginia or South Carolina.

One of our most honored and highest praise that we can bestow on a citizen is to call the citizen a “yeoman” derived from the tradition of our mountain independent, hard-working farmers.

In general, as a people, we are very slow to anger, and very slow to adopt social change to the status quo. But, when we finally reach our limit of toleration, as a people, we are tenacious in defending out social values.

For many years, historians from outside of North Carolina called the state “the Rip Van Winkle” state because the citizens seemed to slumber through the crises that affected other states.

The Encyclopedia of North Carolina noted,

          “There was general political apathy under the state's Democrat-          controlled one-party system, which resulted in widespread           indifference to all economic, social, and cultural improvements. A           letter writer to the North Carolina Farmer in 1845 voiced his           frustration: "O! that our State, . . . would wake up from her Rip Van           Winkle agricultural sleep!!"

We were the only state, in 1788, that refused, on a matter of principle, to ratify Madison’s new centralized Constitution, until it contained a citizen’s Bill of Rights.

For 3 years after the refusal to ratify, the Federalists inflicted serious economic damage on the citizens, in an attempt to coerce North Carolina into ratifying the defective document.

The citizens of North Carolina were extremely reluctant to join the Confederacy, but once committed to battle, the State sent more soldiers to the Confederacy than any other state, suffered more casualties and death than any other state, and had more soldiers skedaddle, from the Army, than any other state.

Our proud heritage of tenacity in the face of overwhelming odds is captured in the phrase from the Civil War:

          First at Bethel. Farthest at Gettysburg. Last at Appomatox.

Robert E. Lee admired the fighting spirit of the North Carolina soldiers by saying that they stuck to the front lines of battle and fought like they had tar on ‘dem’ heels.

North Carolina citizens liked Lee’s description of common Confederate soldiers so much that they nicknamed the UNC athletic teams “The Tar Heels.”

Silent Sam, the statute torn down by socialists, on the campus of the University of North Carolina, was a tribute to the courage of the common soldier, not to the slaveocracy of plantation owners.

The common citizen soldiers of the Confederacy were acutely aware of their economic class differences between themselves and the slave-owners. One of their favorite sayings was that the War “Was a rich man’s war, and a poor man’s fight.”

Unlike the plantation elite rendition, after the War as “the lost cause,” the common soldiers said that they were fighting for “a southern commonwealth of independent producers.”

Later history, as in the fusion politics of 1890s, confirms that the purpose of the War, for common citizens, would have been to create a southern commonwealth of independent producers which was multiracial and egalitarian.

An example of how common North Carolinians citizens have dealt with tyranny, after the War, is provided by the example set by Leonidas Lafayette Polk, the State’s first Commissioner of Agriculture, the founder of N. C. State University, and the leader of the North Carolina farmer’s agrarian populist party, whose political motto was,

           “equal rights for all. special privilege for none.”

Polk confronted the neo-slaveocracy of one-party rule of the Democrats by creating a third political party, which successfully won the campaign for Governor in 1896.

 The Encyclopedia of NC noted,

          “thousands of desperate farmers abandoned the Democrats, who           called themselves "the white man's party," for the Populists, who           claimed to be the poor man's party. The Democrat (white mans’s)           Party had abolished the right to vote in local self-governments in a           number of counties having Republican majorities. Local officials in           these counties had been appointed by the Democratic majority in the           legislature.”

The Encyclopedia could have been more accurate by noting that fusion was a political coalition between common white farmers, and common Black citizens, that “fused” together to elect Republican Governor Russell, in 1896.

We argue that this history of fusion would have been the desired outcome of the War for common citizens, but not for the slave-owners. The Democrat slave-owners organized a violent revolt to kill the populist insurgency, including the use of gatling guns and howitzers to kill unnamed Blacks in Wilmington, in 1898.

After the Democrat white man’s party coup d’etat of the overthrow of the Republican Wilmington town council, in 1898, North Carolina endured 70 years of one-party tyrannical apartheid of white man Democrat governors.

As Josephus Daniels, the owner of the Raleigh News and Observer, put it, in 1899,

          “North Carolina is a WHITE MAN'S STATE and WHITE MEN will           rule it, and they will crush the party of Negro domination (Polk’s           Populist Party) beneath a majority so overwhelming that no other           party will ever dare to attempt to establish negro rule here.”

One hundred years before the agrarian populism of Polk, North Carolina’s farmers formed a resistance movement to tyrannical royal governors, who had been appointed by the King’s Privy Council.

Known as the Regulator Movement, 6,000 farmers joined forces in an armed revolt against royal officials, who were engaged in corruption and fraud, by charging the farmers with excessive fees, falsifying records, and engaging in other mistreatments.

The farmer’s called themselves “regulators” because they wanted to regulate their own affairs, free from centralized tyranny.

According to the Encyclopedia of North Carolina,

          “A new governor, William Tryon, arrived in 1765; he was a British           army colonel and became the cause of renewed unrest, The           Regulators sought a public meeting with colonial officials to       discover "whether the free men of this county labor under any        abuses of power or not." In March 1771, the governor's privy     council advised Tryon to call out the militia and march against the          rebel farmers.”

One lesson from that episode comes from Tryon’s seeking advice from his privy council, modeled after the King’s Privy Council, in London. The historical genesis of the Governor’s Privy Council is derived from John Locke’s first constitution of North Carolina, in 1669.

The legacy of the rogue governors caused the common citizens to distribute executive power in the hands of many other elected representatives.

From that point forward, all of North Carolina’s Constitutions have included a provision for the governor to seek advice from the privy council, renamed to the North Carolina Council of State.

The most recent version of the North Carolina Constitution, adopted in 1971, states,

          “Sec. 8.  Council of State. The Council of State shall consist of the           officers whose offices are established by this Article.”

The “other officers” mentioned in Section 8, are the ten independently state-wide, elected executive officers, who share co-equal executive powers with the Governor.

And, it is to this provision that citizens must now turn for insight into how to deal with Governor Cooper’s rogue Covid lockdown tyranny. (Tyranny Slips Quietly Into the Tar Heel State, Laurie Thomas Vass, The CLP News Network, March 29, 2020.)

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the Introduction of a much longer copyrighted article of the Citizen Liberty Party News Network, for July 13, 2020.

The other sections of the longer article include:

Section 1. Governor Cooper’s Illegal and Unconstitutional Covid Lockdown Edicts.

Section 2. The Inadequacy of Reforming the Defective General Statute 166A.

Section 3. The Constitutional Amendment Imperative to Protect Citizen’s Right to Work.

Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category Democrat Party Socialism, and is titled, The Right to Work Constitutional Amendment to Reign In North Carolina’s Rogue Lockdown Governor.

The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.