自2022年底ChatGPT問世以來,大型語言模型(LLMs)以其「人類水平」的文本生成和修改能力,迅速席捲學術界,引發了對於其在科學寫作中應用的巨大關注和討論。這次我們利用10分鐘討論:(一) AI寫作的初步審判 — 品質與正確性之謎;(二) AI隱形之手與其足跡—「過量詞彙」的大數據檢測;(三) 規範與未來 — 確保學術誠信的道路。
兩位風趣的AI主持人深入探討大型語言模型(LLM)如何改變學術寫作,分析四篇論文。討論LLM普及率、品質挑戰及GAMER聲明如何確保透明與學術誠信。
Luo X, Tham YC, Giuffrè M, Ranisch R, Daher M, Lam K, Eriksen AV, Hsu CW, Ozaki A, Moraes FY, Khanna S, Su KP, Begagić E, Bian Z, Chen Y, Estill J; GAMER Working Group. Reporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research: the GAMER Statement. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 13:bmjebm-2025-113825.
Cheng SL, Tsai SJ, Bai YM, Ko CH, Hsu CW, Yang FC, Tsai CK, Tu YK, Yang SN, Tseng PT, Hsu TW, Liang CS, Su KP. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e51229.
Hsu TW, Tseng PT, Tsai SJ, Ko CH, Thompson T, Hsu CW, Yang FC, Tsai CK, Tu YK, Yang SN, Liang CS, Su KP. Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers. Psychiatry Res. 2024 Nov;341:116145.
Kobak D, González-Márquez R, Horvát EÁ, Lause J. Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary. Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 4;11(27):eadt3813.
https://open.firstory.me/user/cmch3k8fh085801ws6amt1ixk/comments
Powered by Firstory Hosting