For decades, Silicon Valley convinced itself that neutrality was possible.
That building consumer products while avoiding the hardest public problems was a moral stance rather than a business choice. That the state was obsolete, belief was naïve, and technology would inevitably bend the world toward progress without anyone having to take responsibility for outcomes.
In this episode, we work through The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West by Alex Karp and Nicholas W. Zamiska—and take their argument seriously.
We examine how belief eroded in elite technology culture, why institutions became optimized to avoid responsibility rather than achieve results, and how software and artificial intelligence have collapsed the distance between engineering decisions and real-world power.
Along the way, we look at:
* Why fear of misuse has become an excuse for inaction
* How Palantir’s work with defense and law enforcement exposes the moral asymmetry in modern technology debates
* Why consumer tech crowded out public capability
* What “soft belief” actually means—and why it matters
* Why hard power has returned, whether we like it or not
This is not an episode about slogans or ideology. It is about capacity. About responsibility. About whether the people most capable of building the systems that now shape the world are willing to accept the burden of governing them.
Because neutrality is no longer neutral.And standing aside is still a choice
.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit codeandcouncil.substack.com