
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday we learned the idea of millions of years came from a new way of looking at rock layers that rejected the eyewitness account of history in God’s Word. Now how did the church react to this shift?
Well, many scientists rejected it! They argued the Bible’s history could be trusted and the catastrophe of Noah’s flood made more sense of the evidence than the idea of slow and gradual processes.
But, sadly many other Christians simply accepted the millions of years. They said it didn’t matter what someone believed about the age of the earth. But their compromise had disastrous consequences. More on that tomorrow.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
370370 ratings
Yesterday we learned the idea of millions of years came from a new way of looking at rock layers that rejected the eyewitness account of history in God’s Word. Now how did the church react to this shift?
Well, many scientists rejected it! They argued the Bible’s history could be trusted and the catastrophe of Noah’s flood made more sense of the evidence than the idea of slow and gradual processes.
But, sadly many other Christians simply accepted the millions of years. They said it didn’t matter what someone believed about the age of the earth. But their compromise had disastrous consequences. More on that tomorrow.

8,621 Listeners

3,931 Listeners

1,704 Listeners

2,185 Listeners

1,512 Listeners

1,947 Listeners

3,074 Listeners

3,132 Listeners

2,873 Listeners

21,002 Listeners

5,376 Listeners

1,498 Listeners

1,574 Listeners

2,889 Listeners

12,915 Listeners