
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday we learned the idea of millions of years came from a new way of looking at rock layers that rejected the eyewitness account of history in God’s Word. Now how did the church react to this shift?
Well, many scientists rejected it! They argued the Bible’s history could be trusted and the catastrophe of Noah’s flood made more sense of the evidence than the idea of slow and gradual processes.
But, sadly many other Christians simply accepted the millions of years. They said it didn’t matter what someone believed about the age of the earth. But their compromise had disastrous consequences. More on that tomorrow.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Yesterday we learned the idea of millions of years came from a new way of looking at rock layers that rejected the eyewitness account of history in God’s Word. Now how did the church react to this shift?
Well, many scientists rejected it! They argued the Bible’s history could be trusted and the catastrophe of Noah’s flood made more sense of the evidence than the idea of slow and gradual processes.
But, sadly many other Christians simply accepted the millions of years. They said it didn’t matter what someone believed about the age of the earth. But their compromise had disastrous consequences. More on that tomorrow.

5,211 Listeners

2,713 Listeners

1,514 Listeners

159 Listeners

1,012 Listeners

3,129 Listeners

2,856 Listeners

5,370 Listeners

5,330 Listeners

1,533 Listeners

2,466 Listeners

948 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,089 Listeners