Law School

Contract law: Excuses for non-performance - Unconscionability


Listen Later

Unconscionability (sometimes known as unconscionable dealing/conduct in Australia) is a doctrine in contract law that describes terms that are so extremely unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power, that they are contrary to good conscience. Typically, an unconscionable contract is held to be unenforceable because no reasonable or informed person would otherwise agree to it. The perpetrator of the conduct is not allowed to benefit, because the consideration offered is lacking, or is so obviously inadequate, that to enforce the contract would be unfair to the party seeking to escape the contract.

Unconscionability is determined by examining the circumstances of the parties when the contract was made, such as their bargaining power, age, and mental capacity. Other issues might include lack of choice, superior knowledge, and other obligations or circumstances surrounding the bargaining process. Unconscionable conduct is also found in acts of fraud and deceit, where the deliberate misrepresentation of fact deprives someone of a valuable possession. When a party takes unconscionable advantage of another, the action may be treated as criminal fraud or the civil action of deceit.

For the defense of unconscionability to apply, the contract has to have been unconscionable at the time it was made; later circumstances that make the contract extremely one-sided are irrelevant. There are generally no standardized criteria for determining unconscionability; it is a subjective judgment by the judge, not a jury, and is applied only when it would be an affront to the integrity of the judicial system to enforce such a contract. Upon finding unconscionability a court has a great deal of flexibility on how it remedies the situation. It may refuse to enforce the contract against the party unfairly treated on the theory that they were misled, lacked information, or signed under duress or misunderstanding; it may refuse to enforce the offending clause, or take other measures it deems necessary to have a fair outcome. Damages are usually not awarded.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Law SchoolBy The Law School of America

  • 3.1
  • 3.1
  • 3.1
  • 3.1
  • 3.1

3.1

60 ratings


More shows like Law School

View all
Hidden Brain by Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam

Hidden Brain

43,547 Listeners

Global News Podcast by BBC World Service

Global News Podcast

7,810 Listeners

The Ben Shapiro Show by The Daily Wire

The Ben Shapiro Show

153,984 Listeners

Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer by Legal Talk Network

Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

487 Listeners

The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond by Alison Monahan and Lee Burgess - Law School Toolbox, LLC

The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond

511 Listeners

Court Junkie by PodcastOne

Court Junkie

8,529 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

113,168 Listeners

Speak English Now Podcast: Learn English | Speak English without grammar. by Georgiana, founder of SpeakEnglishPodcast.com

Speak English Now Podcast: Learn English | Speak English without grammar.

558 Listeners

Crime Junkie by Audiochuck

Crime Junkie

369,752 Listeners

The Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast: Pass the Bar Exam with Less Stress by Bar Exam Toolbox

The Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast: Pass the Bar Exam with Less Stress

441 Listeners

Dateline NBC by NBC News

Dateline NBC

47,696 Listeners

SRMN by SRMN

SRMN

19 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,943 Listeners

Mind of a Monster: The Cross-Country Killer by ID

Mind of a Monster: The Cross-Country Killer

1,871 Listeners

Ishq- by Muzammil Jit

Ishq-

3 Listeners