Critical Thinking Brain

Why do shoppers have freedom to discriminate but business owners lose that freedom?

BLM doesn't like capitalism unless blacks are making money 

Illegals are in the process of committing crimes while on US soil including University campus

Just like the past - 1985- the media are trying to hide black on white crime

Clery Act - black on white crime- rape and murder- Jeanne Clery 

Another case - ESU - eastern michigan-- they tried to hide another black on white rape and murder-

"Eastern Michigan University Stays Quiet About Student's Rape and Murder for Weeks"- June 20, 2007 — -- Laura Dickinson

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3297153&page=1

Why not include illegals in crime stats?

Bc of Arbrey trial, where people said that Travis McMichael didn't have a right to self defense because he was unlawfully trying to do citizen arrest - so even if attacked he couldn't defend himself--- well apply that logic to illegals--- they are committing crimes just by being here--- so do they not have the right to self defense even if they are attacked ?

Follow up-- this is a dangerous precedent-- why? Bc illegals could be confronted by citizens (bc the Biden admin won't do it) to expel them over the border by force- yes by force- and if the illegal fights back they are in the wrong- bc they have no ability to use self defense as a tool. If you don't believe this to be true and yet you believe the Arbrey verdict to be correct then you are either a hypocrite or you didn't come to your conclusions logically.

Follow up- 

Looters are in the process of committing a crime, just like the McMichaels, so they can't use self defense as an argument even if they are attacked... so by that logic anyone can stop them by force....

How is this different than the logic used in the Arbrey trial to take away Travis's right to self defense?

What kind of crime takes away your right to self defense? Any kind? Being a looter, being an illegal alien, or just trying to make a citizens arrest but failing a checkbox or two?

It might be a win win

Pope wants to censor your speech 

Pope wants to define hate speech

 Pope wants you to pay for illegal immigration and refugees

Pope has a global platform

Churches are the ones using tax payer money to help illegals

Separation of Church and state

Not just churches helping refugees, other non profits doing it

Maybe we should end all non profit tax free status

GOP should end all refugee centers in red states

Pope joining the left on most policies I wouldn't be surprised if he was okay on abortion.

Didn't even mention how the Pope is a climate alarmist/ environmentalist who embraces ESG

Where is the outrage?

Black Pastor thinks he can replace a criminal on death row because there are no black individuals in his mind- just the group of blacks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZeWW9ZOfjQ&ab_channel=KFOROklahoma%27sNews4

If you voted to defund the police, clearly you don't want them to respond to your calls for help

Let's slip police officers info on avg citizens who voted to defund them that way they don't hurry in responding to those people

Not everyone can afford private security

Police aren't required to respond anyways 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

Democrats on the one hand want to hide the race when they report crime, but on the other hand they admit that minorities commit more crime statistically above their % in the population by saying we want to defund the police because more minorities end up in jail

Defunding the police is a wealth transfer from tax payer community police to social programs by race and connected friends of dems 

Race based policies are toxic

Afterthought- Maybe dems want to try to solve minority crime by defunding the police and use that money to help prevent minorities from becoming criminal before they commit a crime (if so, state this goal publicly and have measured goals for this experiment)--- this is my charitable explanation for the defund the police agenda-- and also explains the idea that they know who is by in large committing the crimes (bc they want to give the defunded money to minority communities), which most conservatives always ask why can't we talk about who is committing the crimes... they ask this question because of the media double standard on crime race reporting.. but dems would rather perps walk the streets than stats show higher percent of one race in jail for crimes--- they can only do this though while the media hides crime reports and until a large % of the public starts talking about crimes being a problem and especially about minorities committing most of it and the DA not charging them and letting them out on bond. Why are there separate standards for crime based on what race you are--- this is extremely toxic. The other theory is to defund the police on the local level so the Feds come in (this is probably the Soros plan).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVQe7R_jgfU&ab_channel=LawofSelfDefense

Part of the battle is at the DA. DA's have political discretion when or when not to press charges. If they don't charge, that affects policing and morale. The DA is probably more important on the whole because enforcement of criminal law starts and ends with the prosecutor. The police usually show up after the crime to gather evidence- if they have such low staffing they tell people robbed to collect their own evidence we all know that a DA like Jose Garza of Travis county is going to throw that out as contaminated. So we need to first focus on the DA office, but pressuring local voters with the idea that they are going to be at the bottom of the dispatch list if they voted to defund the police will hopefully psychologically  irritate them. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZMSNlsLPRg&ab_channel=KVUE

This should absolutely not be a controversial idea. If you vote to defund the police you should expect that they don't respond to your 911 call, or respond to you only if they have no other calls. If you are still receiving 911 services at the expense of someone else (bc of low staffing/defunding/limited resources) and you voted to defund the police you are directly responsible for criminal acts that occur to others that might have been prevented in our city. I want a list of names so we know who to sue for civil damages.

With shortages we make choices about who gets the services, why should police respond to people who want them defunded?

On top of stealing our tax dollars from the police, these same dems want to force you to pay for illegal aliens in the build back better bill.

https://scottrasmussen.com/60-oppose-payment-to-illegal-immigrants-in-build-back-better-plan-28-support/

Six people have died now from Waukesha massacre? Are whites still afraid of being called racist? 

I talk about the idea that perhaps you can use LLC DAOs to skirt around laws that do not allow you to control anonymous entities. 

I question whether member names could be exposed of any defi DOAs. I have more questions than answers. 

Again any holder who supports or encourages a government official or a state to buy bitcoin isn't for freedom.

Bitcoin is legal in the US and they can still sell private people and companies to buy bitcoin--- so why do the hodlers focus on getting governments to buy bitcoin to pump their own bags?