
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


I'm increasingly convinced this LBO idea of GBTC is legitimate and possible.
Grayscale has other products besides bitcoin including eth, ltc, etc...
Could you raise money through a DAO to do a LBO of gbtc?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkLW4e1j7pI
GBTC is a business trust
Hedge fund can sell bitcoin futures short
Then buy up gbtc shares at a discount- (bc lets be honest gbtc hasn't been doing great lately)
They then vote grayscale out - the fiduciary trustee- grayscale doesn't own this product- the shareholders do
They then vote to dissolve the gbtc product to get at the real bitcoin
Then dump the bitcoin
Bitcoin price falls off a cliff
Buy back the futures - profit.
What would converting to a an ETF actually do???? I have no idea, but I would love to know.
First pass review of documentary - This Machine Greens
The bitcoiners really love that volcano in El Salvador
Bitcoin miners are green energy only advocates
No time for energy freedom from the bitcoiners
PR campaign that correctly identifies why using energy in general is good for humans, but falsely claims that expenditure of energy should not be tied to the thing that it is used for -- especially when tied to 'money'-- meaning that energy spent is the focus--- even if that energy is 'wasted' meaning their is no utility to the energy spent- they don't get this concept and they don't even dare broach this topic.
Anything to get more non white people into our country--- just remember- the bitcoin people now support this--- climate as a reason to import refugees
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1451674795150614534
We should want justice minded objective fair regulators, not regulators that are political-- these are the people the crypto people should be very afraid of. You can start off as an objective regulator, but it also needs to make economic sense. This is why there will be a DAO that hunts or preys off the crypto industry using the courts- sort of like patent trolls- but not patents.
Crypto lobbyists do not fear political regulators- regulators who just follow the party boss and accept bribes. Who they fear are people like me, who have thought about getting a law degree and who might go become a regulator based on my personal justice minded goals
The law is just someone's opinion
Crypto lawyers are just paid big bucks to offer creative opinions on why traditional security laws do not or should not apply to crypto- they are paid for their opinions
I talk again about the grid and bitcoin miners
Something for nothing- go read Frank Shostak on Mises
Legit lending from real savings vs illegitimate lending through out of thin air printed dollars or tether
To understand ask yourself --- how does the tether come into existence?--- just like dollars right?-- it isn't like p2p lending is it?- where you have legitimate loans and lending from savings?-- no it isn't like p2p lending. Ask yourself- who is the only one that has the privilege of creating tether out of thin air? Ask yourself- who is the only one that has the privilege of creating dollars out of thin air?
*Disclaimer-- tokens or crypto and especially 'stablecoins' aren't dollars and will never be dollars, which is why the secret service doesn't care about stablecoins. Stablecoins aren't counterfeits, they aren't pretending to be us dollars. They just are very very clever in their marketing. The only thing they might be are securities and they might be committing fraud- most definitely. Stablecoins as a word should never be taken seriously and shouldn't be used by lawyers or law makers or regulators. It is another example of the crypto industry trying to create their own category for certain products like NFTs or like Coinbase wanting a separate regulator just for the crypto industry, to confuse and to gain advantage, mostly regulatory advantage.
* on counterfeiting (this isn't what stablecoins do, but what the secret service focuses on)/ on creating dollars out of thin air (this is what stablecoins do)-- only a bank can do this right--- RIGHT- and that tells you exactly what stablecoins are not-- they are not dollars
Sell into the bitcoin rising price
There will not be enough real dollars when you want to sell your bitcoin
The price run up is due to tethers being printed out of thin air and lent to crypto companies like FTX, Celsius, Blockstream
Collateral for the loans of usdt do not back up or give value to the stablecoin itself
Printing tethers is like the commercial banking being able to print dollars out of thin air and lend them out ---- John Paul Koning even asks why is this different than Paypal and different than exchanging tether for us dollars.... hopefully he can understand the difference soon.
https://twitter.com/jp_koning/status/1450452148156776464
https://twitter.com/jp_koning/status/1450452148156776464
"Say that there are two stablecoin issuers. One lends out new stablecoins for bitcoin collateral. Another issues new stablecoin for fiat, then lends that fiat out for bitcoin collateral. Is there an economic difference between the two? Aren't their ending balance sheets the same?"
"Tether's terms of service explicitly prevents it from creating new USDT stablecoin units for bitcoin: "only money will be accepted upon issuance." So why is Tether lending USDT to Celsius in return for bitcoin/ethereum collateral?"
https://twitter.com/tphillips/status/1450459111209017354
Critics of tether like the Fed money printing, they just don't want crypto people to do it
Bitcoin maxis who like tether don't like the Fed money printing but are perfectly okay with crypto doing it-- bc it benefits them
Dan Awry gets it
https://twitter.com/DanAwrey/status/1450463260134813706
"Also, if lending USDT directly involves creating new USDT out of thin air, then I would think transaction 1 poses different risks to *other holders* of USDT given the now diluted backing for their claims."
"Ah, I misinterpreted your hypo JP. In that case the transactions themselves are identical - the real difference, as I think Todd is suggesting, is that the creation of new Tethers in transaction 1 without any consideration has the effect of diluting the claims of USDT holders."
To understand ask yourself --- how does the tether come into existence?--- just like dollars right?-- it isn't like p2p lending is it?- where you have legitimate loans and lending from savings?-- no it isn't like p2p lending. Ask yourself- who is the only one that has the privilege of creating tether out of thin air? Ask yourself- who is the only one that has the privilege of creating dollars out of thin air?
*Disclaimer-- tokens or crypto and especially 'stablecoins' aren't dollars and will never be dollars, which is why the secret service doesn't care about stablecoins. Stablecoins aren't counterfeits, they aren't pretending to be us dollars. They just are very very clever in their marketing. The only thing they might be are securities and they might be committing fraud- most definitely. Stablecoins as a word should never be taken seriously and shouldn't be used by lawyers or law makers or regulators. It is another example of the crypto industry trying to create their own category for certain products like NFTs or like Coinbase wanting a separate regulator just for the crypto industry, to confuse and to gain advantage, mostly regulatory advantage.
* on counterfeiting on creating dollars out of thin air-- only a bank can do this right--- RIGHT- and that tells you exactly what stablecoins are not-- they are not dollars
https://rekt.news/indexed-finance-rekt/
Defi protocol gets 'hacked' and the dev who created it cries to the internet when things do not go their way
Live by code is law, die by code is law
Hackers should be protected, if they are hacking only on the blockchain
Now if this guy was a general partner, the hacker, then there is a way to get your money back- but that involves suing them as a general partner
Having your cake and eating it too
All this is a deflection from the known dev that admitted it was his fault - his code--- sue him if you want, you know is name
Call their bluff, because they are bluffing
What exactly can the hacker be charged with? Like precisely?
Incentivizing new POW cryptos with green energy bitcoin miner policies
A rebirth in new POW tokens?
Trading energy on the grid more profitable than the tokens themselves?
What's a future
Lots of fees
Wall street's job is to securitize
rolling over contracts
front running
SEC approved why== reference price instead of real bitcoin? How is that still not manipulation?
Think of it as a tool- a trading tool
buyer beware
Inflation means getting something for nothing--- this would be the beneficiaries of inflation or the money printing-- if you aren't benefiting from the money printing you are being harmed if you are holding the currency being inflated
many assets that could serve as inflation hedges including commodities but also companies that produce things we need- key phrase is things we need
the best inflation hedges are probably real things that you need in the real economy
who needs bitcoin ? that is a good question to ask yourself when you compare that to who needs a place to live, food, etc
start to try to deeply understand what inflation means and then you can better understand how to respond
make up your own mind what is your best inflation hedge based on your own economic situation because there is no right answer
From the publisher's feed