
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Startups can’t afford to be wrong on an 18-month cycle—and neither can the services or the acquisition system that supports them. Callye and Noah deconstruct the so-called “valley of death,” separating structural reality from self-inflicted pain and inexperience. They dig into how narrative, incentives, and tighter demo cycles can compress risk and get real capability into the hands of operators faster.
Topics[00:00] - Why startups (and DoD) can’t afford 18-month mistakes
[02:34] - Rethinking the “valley of death” and reclaiming agency
[05:24] - A contrarian view: the valley as mirage and self-inflicted pain
[09:02] - “SBIR is not free money” and the cost of choosing the wrong sponsor
[11:54] - Defense tech jobs, new attention, and why this moment matters
[17:33] - Kform’s roots: from Navy machinist and Circle K to Kform
[23:55] - Building Kform’s playbook: the “team behind your team”
[26:29] - Steam Studios and competition-based drones as a new acquisition pattern
[31:20] - Tight demo loops: slightly wrong every two weeks vs. catastrophically wrong in 18 months
[36:57] - Policy shifts, acquisition reform, and closing reflections
“We can’t afford to be wrong in 18 months. We can afford to be slightly wrong—and getting less wrong—every two weeks.”
To partner with Kform, explore collaboration, or bring a product from prototype to field faster, visit kform.com and reach out to the team. If this episode resonates, share it with a founder, operator, or investor who cares about actually fielding capability—not just talking about it.
By Callye Keen5
1010 ratings
Startups can’t afford to be wrong on an 18-month cycle—and neither can the services or the acquisition system that supports them. Callye and Noah deconstruct the so-called “valley of death,” separating structural reality from self-inflicted pain and inexperience. They dig into how narrative, incentives, and tighter demo cycles can compress risk and get real capability into the hands of operators faster.
Topics[00:00] - Why startups (and DoD) can’t afford 18-month mistakes
[02:34] - Rethinking the “valley of death” and reclaiming agency
[05:24] - A contrarian view: the valley as mirage and self-inflicted pain
[09:02] - “SBIR is not free money” and the cost of choosing the wrong sponsor
[11:54] - Defense tech jobs, new attention, and why this moment matters
[17:33] - Kform’s roots: from Navy machinist and Circle K to Kform
[23:55] - Building Kform’s playbook: the “team behind your team”
[26:29] - Steam Studios and competition-based drones as a new acquisition pattern
[31:20] - Tight demo loops: slightly wrong every two weeks vs. catastrophically wrong in 18 months
[36:57] - Policy shifts, acquisition reform, and closing reflections
“We can’t afford to be wrong in 18 months. We can afford to be slightly wrong—and getting less wrong—every two weeks.”
To partner with Kform, explore collaboration, or bring a product from prototype to field faster, visit kform.com and reach out to the team. If this episode resonates, share it with a founder, operator, or investor who cares about actually fielding capability—not just talking about it.

4,394 Listeners

1,095 Listeners

8,776 Listeners

112,956 Listeners

21 Listeners

10,227 Listeners

170 Listeners

188 Listeners

20 Listeners

14 Listeners