Guest: Shawn A. McMillan 

We discuss all issues CPS - this is a must listen podcast if you are being impacted by CPS. Shawn has won nearly $10m in CPS lawsuits. 

Things Shawn and I Discuss: 

1. CPS rule: “No finding no funding”
2. How to sue CPS 
3. What mistakes CPS must make in order to get around their immunity
4. Is there an incentive system in State and Federal – walk us through the CPS process
5. What’s your best defense when accused?
6. How do you get around their qualified immunity privilege
7. Cops have lost some of their immunity, why hasn't CPS? 
8. Did CPS really believe they has a right to lie? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_8-8IZLP4w Teh Right to Lie case
9. TransparentCalifornia.org
10. Why isn’t the press getting involved.

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us 

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity 

The San Diego District Attorney Luis Pena and Judge Kimberlee Lagotta are responsible for this fiasco.  https://ballotpedia.org/Kimberlee_Lagotta 

These two charlatans conspired to arrest a very respectable dad and issue a protective warrant on his 15-year-old son.  Why? for parental abduction, but they made it look like a kidnapping so that NO BAIL was set.  No bail is given to murderers and repeat offenders not dad's. The fact is, I know Bryce and Rob. Bryce CHOSE to live with Robert. Yes there was a court order for Bryce to live with mom, but it was based on a fraud upon the court and a commissioner that endorsed that fraud, Commissioner Patt Ratekin. We've had a lot of complaints about Ms. Ratekin, her actions are very concerning.  Want to donate to help Rob and Bryce? www.kidsmatter.charity  

Today we discuss the importance of "In re Marriage of Prentis-Margulis & Margulis" Which discusses the fiduciary responsibility of spouses not to hide assets and the ramifications if they do. We get into Family Code 721, 1100, 1101 and some corporation code (yes spouses do fall under these codes as well).

In a marital dissolution proceeding to divide the community property, where the nonmanaging spouse has prima facie evidence that community assets of a certain value have disappeared while in the control *330 of the managing spouse post-separation, should the managing spouse have the burden of proof to account for the missing assets? The answer is yes.

Family code 1100 and 721 to disclose

Join Mark Esquibel, Michael Alexander and myself as we discuss this.  

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us 

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity 

Guest Mark Esquibel and I break down the Child Protective Case Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir. 1999) and how it applies to a case in Los Angeles. 

If CPS has taken your kids, this is a must-listen podcast. 

Cases Cited  Right to Lie case

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd_8-8IZLP4w%26fbclid%3DIwAR3yO0zfHyDEZpcuIkXXyVlJKjdlSDBBdVmPxs6FjhQP2TsP773VtBVbkkQ&h=AT1nPGryyIGLi5FpxtryUJWVJRoeUygX_MgAmG677zuPawqtanUIJ-LSgds7RujjzzFvGZjxU_LPTOoppHw-5ajgHxa22sxTUcNtgbqdr8CFMBDoV19e2fqo45B0JuP1mws

Case Law - Wallis versus Spencer https://casetext.com/case/wallis-v-spencer?fbclid=IwAR1ahbfePU4uxQhuFNpyTY-fAqxbkJyBs79AQoe4nXOZQHo40dCG5ACP7DA

Dr. Charles Sophy – Starting at minute 24

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DVxhREF0u1t8%26feature%3Dyoutu.be%26fbclid%3DIwAR1yVBoP1KQaNFYtzZmPnDmbHeIumT1oww7G8D2rX_Yzx-hPN-O0DOWlyhM&h=AT1nPGryyIGLi5FpxtryUJWVJRoeUygX_MgAmG677zuPawqtanUIJ-LSgds7RujjzzFvGZjxU_LPTOoppHw-5ajgHxa22sxTUcNtgbqdr8CFMBDoV19e2fqo45B0JuP1mws

Sean McMIllian is the Attorney on the LA Case

Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir. 1999) (“Because the swing of every pendulum brings with it potential adverse consequences, it is important to emphasize that in the area of child abuse, as with the investigation and prosecution of all crimes, the state is constrained by the substantive and procedural guarantees of the Constitution. The fact that the suspected crime may be heinous — whether it involves children or adults — does not provide cause for the state to ignore the rights of the accused or any other parties.”)

Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 1999) (“ Escondido police officers, evidently acting on the basis of a non-existent court order, seized the children, aged two and five, placed them in a county-run institution, and several days later, without obtaining judicial authorization and without notifying their parents, took them to a hospital for the performance of highly intrusive anal and vaginal physical examinations. The children were not returned to their parents for approximately two and one-half months. All of this occurred after a mental patient who had a long history of delusional disorders and was confined to a mental institution told her therapist a fantastic tale of Satanic witchcraft within her family and an impending child sacrifice. T”)

The district court initially granted the City's motion for summary judgment on the erroneous theory that the action was collaterally estopped by a preliminary ruling of the juvenile court referee, and we reversed. Subsequently, the district court again granted the City summary judgment, this time on the merits. Again, we reverse.

Ben Schooley is a Pro Se coach. Listen to what he went through before taking his own case over.  Partial Transcripts  Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Joining me today is Ben Schooley. He's a pro se coach, and he knows a lot about family law. So I thought what a perfect person to have on the show. Because he's been there done that. And we always love those types of people. So before we jump in, Ben, can you kind of give us your background how you got into this, and we'll take it from there. You're talking about like, like for damages? Yeah. No, I mean, no, I have no, my deal is over done with I mean, my life has moved forward. And it is what it is, and it's gonna finish out the way it's gonna finish out. I've been talking with a lot of people about loss of consortium, which if you don't know what that is, is like, when you and your spouse are driving in a car and an 18 Wheeler hits you and kills your spouse, then the personal injury attorneys will sue on loss of consortium, which has got no monetary limit. And that goes after their insurance policy, which is the loss of consortium is a loss of the relationship that I would have had without your interference. And so I've been trying to encourage somebody to kind of pick up that football enrollment loss of consortium in a civil family law situation as you know, you, you lied. I proved that ultimately, it took me five years to do it. I mean, but You wrecked my relationship with my child. And I leave $10 million, because I think that would set such a precedent for damages and for process in case law. But today, it hasn't happened. I keep hoping that somebody will kind of pick up that football run with it. Yeah.

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us 

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity 

Today I discuss a case in Washington where a judge will not recuse himself despite mountains of evidence against him.  Predrag has tried everything but to no avail. Learn what I would do in his situation. 

About our Guest Predrag Tosic  "My name is very South-Slavic. Both my first and last names are unique to the former Yugoslavia. I was born and raised in Belgrade. What was Yugoslavia at the time, and is today the capital of Serbia. And you know I've been in this country [the US] for about 30 years now, ever since my undergraduate college. I lived in about eight different states, moving around a lot especially between 2006 when I got my PhD and 2015. I also used to live and work in your state of California, in Silicon Valley. I also lived in Maryland, Illinois, Texas, Idaho and different parts of Washington state. My graduate school was where I spent the longest, almost 10 years; I have three degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. And then since about 2015, I've been living in the Pacific Northwest, mostly in Washington State and also briefly Idaho. And this is where I got married. A blunder as it turned out if you are heterosexual male, given the massive gender-bias in Washington state when it comes to divorce/custody, but especially when it comes to DV (domestic violence). My daughter Mira was born in Pullman, Washington in the early 2017. Her mother, my ex-wife, is a greater Seattle native. When Mira was a baby, her mother she literally took off with the kid and moved some 300 miles across the state, against my will. It was a book-example of parental abduction, however I made a mistake not treating it as such from the get-go, naively fooling myself it was “just post partum” rather than a premeditated action. Then-wife played games about coming back or not coming back to where the child was born and where I still lived. Then, prior to even establishing a proper residence there, later in 2017 she files for divorce in Seattle, King County, which is the worst for fathers in divorce and child custody, together with Pierce County (just south of King; where the city of Tacoma is located). The entire state of Washington is very bad for fathers, but these two counties (in the uber-woke, de facto one- party ruled western Washington state) are the worst. King County should have never been the proper venue for either divorce or child custody litigation. The gender based discrimination in western Washington is rampant. Family court corruption is rampant. These people are just looking to line up their pockets and pockets of their buddies among greedy lawyers, various “evaluators” and fake experts, and the like. The Constitution and one’s protected rights are blatantly and knowingly violated, whereas the well-being, let alone actual best interest, of the children involved in this quagmire are but a buzzword used by the abusive, corrupt family court judges, but in reality aren’t even an afterthought to those same judges and various “children’s advocates” who are destroying families and (usually) making children fatherless or nearly-fatherless for profits. It’s beyond corrupt and is indeed truly sick; I believe, based on my experience and what I know of other fathers’ experiences in the state of Washington, that these so-called “family courts” are so bad, corrupt and lawless, they are already beyond redemption or being “reformable”; they should be abolished altogether, as the amount of harm they cause is truly astounding!

Divorce Matters Actual podcast

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/divorce-matters/id1545876069

Divorce Matters

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us 

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity 

Keywords

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity 

https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/

Today we will show you how to legally complain and remove a judge. The system has made it difficult, but Angel breaks down how to do it properly.  

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity 

https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/

Transcript: 

We have a returning guest Angel law. That's a pseudonym because she's so mixed up in so many cases. But she's here to explain something that I have a lot of interest in. And I'm sure a lot of you will, and that is how to properly complain and get your judges or attorneys in trouble for violating your rights or the law, or the million other things that they do so with that. Angel, let's talk about what it is that you've done and what you've figured out and what a lot of people don't know just an overview. Right. So what has recently happened was, I was a unique case, where I was able to remove a judge from my own matter by filing a motion to disqualify the judge based upon the judges. very terrible conduct. And this is the most difficult way to remove a judge. And it's fraught with obstacles, and it's something you wouldn't want to do. But in the course of figuring that out. Prior to asking the judge to remove himself because of his misconduct, I can first started off with making a complaint to the presiding judge of my courthouse. And this is really important because you can usually obtain a form by contacting the clerk of your court. And there's an official form that you can even fill out in handwriting. It's about two pages long so special complaint to the presiding judge and you send it in. The presiding judge has 30 days to respond, and they must respond within 30 days. Notice it's something I was looking for be a wonderful tool for all of us if we flood the court. And we drive the presiding judges into having an answer for the accordance conduct of their subordinate judges. We could maybe let them know hey, we know that you guys aren't supposed to be doing this. And Mr. Presiding or Mrs. Presiding Judge. You have an administrative and supervision advisory duty to do something about that. And maybe at least it's you know, just because they're they don't want to do the work. They might say to their subordinate judges. Hey, knock this off. I've got too many complaints to respond to so step number one, when you got to an awful judge is preparing to remove them with either a one or a coordinated effort where you're going to complain to the presiding and then you're going to complain to the BJP. But you don't want to complain. You thought though, I would just interject that doing it. This way to remove the judges is a lot harder than just go into 171 one 70.11 7.3 Or one 70.6 If you haven't recused anyone yet, right? And I, you know, in my experience, when I read the California Code of Civil Procedure, and this is not legal advice, this is my personal experience. I had a conversation with an appellate attorney, and a one 70.6 is a peremptory challenge. That means within 10 days of being appointed, a new judge, like your case is assigned to a new judicial officer. You're supposed to have 10 days and you left to complete your motion to challenge that judge and have an offense. Basically,

Tim Schilling, parental rights advocate in Pennsylvania. I started my horrifying nightmare in December of 2013. And just like everybody else around the United States, I filed for divorce, custody, equable distribution, and during this time, I went through nine different attorneys.

I lost everything I was homeless. I was parentally alienated from my daughter for about three and a half, maybe four years. And they was just attacking me from every which side I was in nine different cases and

 A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.

However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.

And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.

Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show. And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said, Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again. And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And, well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question. My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce 

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u

Wait until you hear this international case of family court shenanigans. Grab your best headphones and take listen.  Yeah, my name is Van Miller. I am by background. I'm a film and TV professional. I've produced television shows. And I also do investigative journalism on the side in order to expose the corruption of all kinds. Well, you know, the family courts, you know, I just don't mince words with family court too much anymore, because, in my opinion, it's a wholly unlawful criminal operation that destroys families. I don't think there's anything lawful about the way things are done in family court. And one of my agendas is to not only bring attention to what's going on, and also to reform the family courts, because right now, as it stands, Family Court is nothing but a completely destructive operation that traumatizes children separates families. And it has to totally be in my opinion, it has to be not not just reformed, I mean, it has to be rebuilt from scratch, because it is a completely destructive operation, in my opinion. Get ahold of Vem at   [email protected].