
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


As we close in on oral argument in the Trump v. United States case wherein Trump asserts some sort of permanent presidential immunity, we close out our preparatory analysis. Impeachment’s relationship to criminal prosecution is explored. Some founding-era conversations involving, for example, John Adams, inform our discussion. Does the concept of double jeopardy play a role? Our hope is that these episodes prepare you for the oral argument with a comprehensive theory of how no one is held above the law even as a powerful executive sits high in We the People’s government. CLE credit is available after listening from podcast.njsba.com.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
375375 ratings
As we close in on oral argument in the Trump v. United States case wherein Trump asserts some sort of permanent presidential immunity, we close out our preparatory analysis. Impeachment’s relationship to criminal prosecution is explored. Some founding-era conversations involving, for example, John Adams, inform our discussion. Does the concept of double jeopardy play a role? Our hope is that these episodes prepare you for the oral argument with a comprehensive theory of how no one is held above the law even as a powerful executive sits high in We the People’s government. CLE credit is available after listening from podcast.njsba.com.

3,549 Listeners

670 Listeners

1,103 Listeners

2,011 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

32,336 Listeners

6,608 Listeners

7,224 Listeners

4,662 Listeners

5,816 Listeners

3,916 Listeners

3,345 Listeners

16,096 Listeners

744 Listeners

8,784 Listeners