When I first sat down to chat with Jeremy Caplan about artificial intelligence and digital productivity tools, I genuinely did not think we would end up talking about him playing the violin. I certainly did not expect the conversation to pivot into a deep, philosophical appreciation for the irreplaceable magic of humans sitting in a room together, simply enjoying a live performance.
But tha’s the funny thing about talking to someone who spends their life evaluating machines. You inevitably end up talking about what it means to be human.
The frictionless technological utopia we were promised feels increasingly like a relentless, exhausting deluge. Every week brings a new platform to master, a new algorithm to appease, and a new artificial intelligence threatening to automate us into oblivion. It’s like drinking from a fire hose while someone yells at you to “pivot to video!”
This is exactly why I was so incredibly relieved to sit down with Jeremy on this episode of Draw Me Anything.
Jeremy is a rare beacon of sanity in the digital miasma. He is the Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY’s Newmark Graduate School of Journalism. He is a former journalist for Time Magazine. Before that, he was a classical violinist. But more importantly for my own daily survival, he is the creator of the massively popular Wonder Tools newsletter on Substack. Jeremy spends his days wading into the chaotic, deeply overwhelming waters of the internet. He tests, breaks, and reviews new apps, software, and digital features so the rest of us don’t have to waste our precious human hours doing it.
Distilling the Chaos
We kicked off the stream talking about the exhaustion of trying to keep up with tech news. It is not just about discovering new tools anymore. It is about tracking the constant, aggressive updates to existing tools. ChatGPT has a new voice feature. Gemini just launched a massive update. Claude is now doing something entirely new with your phone. And you can’t opt out of it.. It never stops.
Jeremy explained that his superpower for distilling this madness down to accessible, bite-sized pieces actually came from his time writing for Time for Kids. When you have to explain complex global news to an eight-year-old in exactly one hundred words, you learn to cut the jargon immediately. You learn to anticipate a human reader’s questions and preemptively answer them.
He also cited the legendary tech writer Walt Mossberg as a major mentor and influence. Mossberg succeeded wildly at The Wall Street Journal because he approached technology not as a deeply entrenched engineer, but as an ordinary guy just trying to figure out how a tool could actually be useful in his daily life.
“I find writing to be extraordinarily difficult. I read The Elements of Style. I read Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. I read David Sedaris constantly to study comedic pacing and essay structure. But actually getting the words out of my head and onto the page feels like passing a kidney stone…”
That is exactly what Jeremy does with Wonder Tools. He doesn’t just list fifty new AI tools that launched on Product Hunt this week. He gives you three specific, highly actionable ways to use one feature of NotebookLM to make your Tuesday slightly less miserable. He gives you templates. He shows you what a forty-page deep research report from Gemini actually looks like, so you do not have to spend twenty minutes generating one just to see if it is useful.
If you enjoy my work and would like to support, please take out a premium subscription (just $1 per week)
Evergreen Processes over Disposable News
One of the most fascinating things about Jeremy’s approach is his focus on evergreen content. We’re constantly blasted with disposable news. A tech CEO gets fired, a new app launches and dies in a week, a company changes its name. Jeremy actively avoids the daily churn. He wants to create resources that a reader can save and return to three weeks later, knowing the information will still be fundamentally useful.
This really resonated with me. I told him about a post I wrote on Medium over a decade ago. People constantly ask me how I manage to juggle cartooning, stand-up comedy, writing, and running a business without completely losing my mind. The answer is timeboxing. I work strictly from a calendar, not a to-do list. I estimate how long a task will take, block it out in my iCal, and adjust the time block later if it took longer or shorter than expected.
I wrote a simple, straightforward piece explaining this exact process. I thought it was old news. Cal Newport had written about it years prior. But the piece went incredibly viral, and I made two thousand dollars from the Medium partner programme purely off that one specific workflow explanation. Sometimes the most valuable tools are not shiny new apps. Sometimes, they are just fundamentally sound ways of organising a chaotic human brain.
The Ethical Calculus of AI
We eventually had to talk about the elephant in the room. Artificial intelligence…
I frequently get accused of being either a doomer or a total Luddite, but the truth is, I am an early adopter. I was one of the very first cartoonists in my circle to embrace Wacom tablets, Cintiqs, and the iPad Pro. I actively test out tablets for companies like Xencelabs. I do not shy away from folding digital tools into my workflow when they help automate the absolute drudgery of administrative freelance life.
However, the rapid acceleration of generative AI requires a lot of mental arithmetic. I told Jeremy about my personal ethical boundaries. I use Grammarly for proofreading. I am currently experimenting with Gemini for deep research. But I absolutely refuse to use Meta AI or Elon Musk’s Grok because I fundamentally distrust the ethics of the people building them. I opt out of the platforms where I find the creators ethically compromised.
Putting these streams together, wrangling brilliant guests, manually untangling the spaghetti bowl of a brain to pull out the best insights, and writing these recaps requires a heady cocktail of intense caffeine and sheer willpower. If you value this little digital monastery, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription for just $1 a week. It pays for my time, repays the time and labour of writing these up, and keeps Morris supplied with the unnecessarily expensive dog food he demands…
Jeremy had a fascinating, highly pragmatic take on this. He acknowledged the massive macro issues. He is deeply aware of the environmental cost of data centres, the terrifying water usage, and the flawed predictive models being used to evaluate people in hospitals and prisons. But he treats his newsletter strictly as “service journalism.”
He used a brilliant restaurant analogy. When we go out to eat, we sometimes evaluate the ethical supply chain of the ingredients, the working conditions of the farmers, and the environmental impact of the transportation. But other times, we just need to eat a sandwich because we are hungry. He doesn’t believe we need to litigate the macro ethics of AI every single time we try to automate a tedious spreadsheet or fix a typo. He leaves the heavy investigative journalism to the experts, specifically citing Karen Hao’s brilliant book Empire of AI, and focuses entirely on practical utility.
The J. Jonah Jameson Editor
I find writing to be extraordinarily difficult. I read The Elements of Style. I read Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. I read David Sedaris constantly to study comedic pacing and essay structure. But actually getting the words out of my head and onto the page feels like passing a kidney stone.
Because I no longer work in a physical newsroom, I deeply miss having a ruthless editor. When I was coming up in newspapers at nineteen years old, I had a classic, cantankerous, ink-in-his-veins editor. He was a J. Jonah Jameson type who had absolutely no compunction about telling me my work was complete garbage. It hurt my precious feelings constantly, but I learned faster than I ever would have with a polite sycophant.
Since I can’t afford to hire a human to yell at me in my apartment, I built a custom AI editor in Gemini. I programmed it with the specific persona of a grumpy, hard-assed, chain-smoking newspaper editor. Now, when I finish a draft by hand, I feed it to the bot. It yells at me about my weak verbs, my terrible grammar, and my overly long paragraphs. I ignore half of its advice because I know the rules well enough to break them, but it forces me to actively defend my choices.
Jeremy agreed completely. He relies heavily on Claude Projects for his micro-editing. He feeds it all of his past writing to establish context, background, and tone, and then uses it as a highly critical sparring partner to catch redundant phrasing and double commas.
He pointed out a provocative but entirely true reality. There are incredible human editors out there. But the average human copy editor simply doesn’t have the bandwidth, the time, or the willingness to ruthlessly tear apart paragraph four and analyse your four different verb choices on a Tuesday night. An AI will do it instantly, comprehensively, and without worrying about hurting your feelings.
Drawing by Hand Before Hitting Undo
This brings us right back to the violin. We talked about where different artists draw the line with these tools. I brought up a story from a previous stream with Liza Donnelly, the brilliant New Yorker cartoonist. She mentioned using AI purely as a brainstorming partner to bounce ideas around.
Our mutual friend, the wonderful British cartoonist Alex Hallatt, heard that and decided to try it. Alex took some scattered, messy notes from a walk, fed them into an LLM, and started riffing on gag premises. It was a great, highly functional workflow. Right up until the bot cheerfully asked, “Do you want me to draw this for you?”
That is the exact moment the panic sets in. It is the moment you realise the tool wants to replace the human element entirely.
I firmly believe that the wobble in the line, the physical imperfections, and the distinct human voice are the only things keeping us from being completely swallowed by the generic digital void. When young students ask me if they should learn to draw on an iPad, I always tell them absolutely not…
Learn to draw by hand first. Learn the absolute fundamentals with ink and paper. If you draw a bad line with a Hunt 101 dip pen, you cannot hit undo. You have to draw that exact line forty-five times until you get it right. You need those neural pathways to form, and you need to understand the physical mechanics of the craft, before you start relying on digital safety nets. You have to learn how to play the instrument before you let a computer tune it for you.
I spent the rest of the stream doing exactly what I love to do. Drawing wobbly, imperfect lines while navigating the absurdities of the modern world. I am deeply grateful for guys like Jeremy who do the heavy lifting in the digital trenches so I can safely retreat to my analogue drafting table.
Now, if you will excuse me, I need to go figure out why Adobe is demanding another subscription fee.
‘til next time!Your pal,
PS. Look, if this actually did something for your brain (or at least distracted you from the creeping dread of your own inbox for six minutes), please consider restacking this and sharing it with your people. It’s the only way the word spreads.
The Tools We Discussed
* Wonder Tools: Jeremy Caplan’s brilliant, incredibly useful Substack newsletter. If you are overwhelmed by tech, start here.
* Claude Projects: Jeremy’s preferred tool for maintaining context and generating ruthless micro-editing feedback.
* Gemini: The engine behind my custom J. Jonah Jameson editor, and a powerful tool for deep research generation.
* NotebookLM: A fascinating tool for organising notes and research that Jeremy frequently writes actionable guides for.
* IA Writer: A beautifully simple, distraction-free writing tool Jeremy relies on.
* Grammarly: My go-to for catching the embarrassing typos that slip through the cracks at 2:00 AM.
* Wacom & Xencelabs: The digital drawing tablets that keep my freelance career afloat.
The Processes We Discussed
* Timeboxing: The absolute lifesaver of a scheduling method where you work strictly from blocked-out calendar chunks rather than a sprawling to-do list.
* Macro vs. Micro Editing: Understanding the difference between fixing a structural narrative flaw (macro) and tightening up a weak verb in paragraph three (micro).
* Custom AI Personas: Training an LLM with a specific voice and set of instructions to act as a specialised sparring partner for your writing.
Resources and Artists Mentioned
* Cartooning in the Age of AI: Alex Hallatt’s incredibly thoughtful Substack documenting her journey and boundaries with digital tools.
* Liza Donnelly: Legendary New Yorker cartoonist and previous DMA guest.
* Walt Mossberg: The legendary tech journalist who proved that writing for the ordinary user is far more valuable than writing for the engineers.
* Cal Newport: The author of Deep Work and a champion of timeboxing.
* AI Snake Oil: The book by Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor that Jeremy’s new Wonder Tools book club is tackling first.
* Bird by Bird: Anne Lamott’s absolute bible on the excruciating, beautiful process of writing.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe