Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Emergency Docket Summary: SCOTUS Green Lights Mass Firings at Education Dep't
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Emergency Docket Summary: SCOTUS Green Lights Mass Firings at Education Dep't
This episode examines a July 14th Supreme Court emergency docket ruling that reveals fundamental tensions about executive power over federal agency firings at the Education Department and the limits of congressional authority.
This episode also compares and contrasts this case (McMahon v. New York) with OPM v. AFGE, a government workforce reduction case discussed in our July 9th episode. In both cases, the government raised virtually identical arguments about standing, jurisdiction and the merits. In both cases, SCOTUS permitted the reductions to take effect while litigation played out.
Case Covered:
McMahon v. New York | Case No. 24A1203 | Docked Link: Here
Bottom Line: SCOTUS allows Trump Administration to proceed with eliminating over half the Department of Education's workforce while legal challenges continue, despite lower courts finding likely constitutional violations.
View all episodes
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments
5
33 ratings
This episode examines a July 14th Supreme Court emergency docket ruling that reveals fundamental tensions about executive power over federal agency firings at the Education Department and the limits of congressional authority.
This episode also compares and contrasts this case (McMahon v. New York) with OPM v. AFGE, a government workforce reduction case discussed in our July 9th episode. In both cases, the government raised virtually identical arguments about standing, jurisdiction and the merits. In both cases, SCOTUS permitted the reductions to take effect while litigation played out.
Case Covered:
McMahon v. New York | Case No. 24A1203 | Docked Link: Here
Bottom Line: SCOTUS allows Trump Administration to proceed with eliminating over half the Department of Education's workforce while legal challenges continue, despite lower courts finding likely constitutional violations.