
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


I don’t blame us for preferring our rather clean, modern Bach editions to this:
But are we so confident in our own interpretations that we can throw out the likes of Hans Bischoff, Carl Czerny, Ferruccio Busoni (pictured) and Donald Francis Tovey? These heavily annotated performance editions, while, yes, they should be read alongside a ‘cleaner’ modern edition, can certainly still teach us some beautiful musicianship.
In this episode, I let Sir Donald Francis Tovey’s remarks on the g-sharp minor prelude and fugue, BWV 863, lead us through an analysis of the work.
Some more from Busoni (the previous prelude and fugue,) his footnotes and ossias are exciting:
Most of these editions are in the public domain on IMSLP. Have a look:
https://imslp.org/wiki/Das_wohltemperierte_Klavier_I,_BWV_846-869_(Bach,_Johann_Sebastian)
Finally, here is the source of confusion about the Picardy third at the end of the g-sharp minor fugue. At first glance, it certainly looks like B natural in the alto voice. (Soprano clef)
But look closer. (Sorry for the resolution.) This is not Bach’s normal natural sign. It has a slash (maybe two slashes?) through it:
Here are few of Bach’s natural signs. Upon comparison, the above sign certainly is modified with extra strokes to form a sharp:
We Rely On Listener Support! How to Donate to this Podcast:
The best way to support this podcast, is to become a paid Substack subscriber at wtfbach.substack.com
Enough paid subscribers = exclusive content, monthly merchandise giveaways!
You can also make a one-time donation here:
https://www.paypal.me/wtfbach
https://venmo.com/wtfbach
Thank you for listening! Thank you for your support.
Concepts Covered:
An analysis of BWV 863 exploring the four-voice fugue, the two counter-subjects, the invention of the prelude with its inversions — guided by Sir Donald Francis Tovey's annotated Well-Tempered Clavier edition. We mention Busoni, Czerny, and Bartok’s edition as well. What do these historic performance editions still have to teach us? Why a modern urtext editions won’t tell the whole story, and finally the confusion at the end of the prelude and fugue: the Picardy third in the alto voice at the finale.
By Evan Shinners4.9
5555 ratings
I don’t blame us for preferring our rather clean, modern Bach editions to this:
But are we so confident in our own interpretations that we can throw out the likes of Hans Bischoff, Carl Czerny, Ferruccio Busoni (pictured) and Donald Francis Tovey? These heavily annotated performance editions, while, yes, they should be read alongside a ‘cleaner’ modern edition, can certainly still teach us some beautiful musicianship.
In this episode, I let Sir Donald Francis Tovey’s remarks on the g-sharp minor prelude and fugue, BWV 863, lead us through an analysis of the work.
Some more from Busoni (the previous prelude and fugue,) his footnotes and ossias are exciting:
Most of these editions are in the public domain on IMSLP. Have a look:
https://imslp.org/wiki/Das_wohltemperierte_Klavier_I,_BWV_846-869_(Bach,_Johann_Sebastian)
Finally, here is the source of confusion about the Picardy third at the end of the g-sharp minor fugue. At first glance, it certainly looks like B natural in the alto voice. (Soprano clef)
But look closer. (Sorry for the resolution.) This is not Bach’s normal natural sign. It has a slash (maybe two slashes?) through it:
Here are few of Bach’s natural signs. Upon comparison, the above sign certainly is modified with extra strokes to form a sharp:
We Rely On Listener Support! How to Donate to this Podcast:
The best way to support this podcast, is to become a paid Substack subscriber at wtfbach.substack.com
Enough paid subscribers = exclusive content, monthly merchandise giveaways!
You can also make a one-time donation here:
https://www.paypal.me/wtfbach
https://venmo.com/wtfbach
Thank you for listening! Thank you for your support.
Concepts Covered:
An analysis of BWV 863 exploring the four-voice fugue, the two counter-subjects, the invention of the prelude with its inversions — guided by Sir Donald Francis Tovey's annotated Well-Tempered Clavier edition. We mention Busoni, Czerny, and Bartok’s edition as well. What do these historic performance editions still have to teach us? Why a modern urtext editions won’t tell the whole story, and finally the confusion at the end of the prelude and fugue: the Picardy third in the alto voice at the finale.

6,881 Listeners

314 Listeners

10,747 Listeners

2,191 Listeners

7,674 Listeners

30 Listeners

4,167 Listeners

12,741 Listeners

5,576 Listeners

954 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

2,303 Listeners

3,538 Listeners

9,438 Listeners

1,082 Listeners