
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Murthy v. Missouri the Court refused to consider the merits of a free-speech case because the plaintiffs allegedly lacked "standing," but as the dissent argues, all the elements for standing were present, and the Court most certainly should have ruled on the merits. Tracy Beanz, who's followed the case closely, joins us.
Sponsors: Monetary Metals & Persist SEO
Show notes for Ep. 2511
By Tom Woods4.8
33123,312 ratings
In Murthy v. Missouri the Court refused to consider the merits of a free-speech case because the plaintiffs allegedly lacked "standing," but as the dissent argues, all the elements for standing were present, and the Court most certainly should have ruled on the merits. Tracy Beanz, who's followed the case closely, joins us.
Sponsors: Monetary Metals & Persist SEO
Show notes for Ep. 2511

3,993 Listeners

5,549 Listeners

4,935 Listeners

2,276 Listeners

974 Listeners

1,146 Listeners

38 Listeners

336 Listeners

483 Listeners

2,182 Listeners

5,372 Listeners

941 Listeners

512 Listeners

16,982 Listeners

544 Listeners