
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses the “good cause” standard for seeking a protective order limiting the use of deposition transcripts and recordings beyond the pending case. Some judges continue to misapply the applicable standard for such protective orders. Garrity talks about one such ruling, just issued, that once again applied an outdated and legally erroneous standard. Given the ease with which deposition transcripts and recordings can be instantly posted online - and in light of the fact that many parties and foes do exactly that - Garrity argues that you should actively and routinely consider the use of a protective order to limit the non-judicial circulation and use of deposition testimony.
SHOW NOTES
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, et al., 2023 WL 2890152, Case No,. CV-
 By Jim Garrity
By Jim Garrity5
9898 ratings
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses the “good cause” standard for seeking a protective order limiting the use of deposition transcripts and recordings beyond the pending case. Some judges continue to misapply the applicable standard for such protective orders. Garrity talks about one such ruling, just issued, that once again applied an outdated and legally erroneous standard. Given the ease with which deposition transcripts and recordings can be instantly posted online - and in light of the fact that many parties and foes do exactly that - Garrity argues that you should actively and routinely consider the use of a protective order to limit the non-judicial circulation and use of deposition testimony.
SHOW NOTES
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, et al., 2023 WL 2890152, Case No,. CV-

32,108 Listeners

30,638 Listeners

43,570 Listeners

16,353 Listeners

461 Listeners

26,395 Listeners

9,484 Listeners

56,391 Listeners

185 Listeners

5,759 Listeners

16,030 Listeners

48 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,779 Listeners

8,398 Listeners