
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses the “good cause” standard for seeking a protective order limiting the use of deposition transcripts and recordings beyond the pending case. Some judges continue to misapply the applicable standard for such protective orders. Garrity talks about one such ruling, just issued, that once again applied an outdated and legally erroneous standard. Given the ease with which deposition transcripts and recordings can be instantly posted online - and in light of the fact that many parties and foes do exactly that - Garrity argues that you should actively and routinely consider the use of a protective order to limit the non-judicial circulation and use of deposition testimony.
SHOW NOTES
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, et al., 2023 WL 2890152, Case No,. CV-
By Jim Garrity5
9999 ratings
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses the “good cause” standard for seeking a protective order limiting the use of deposition transcripts and recordings beyond the pending case. Some judges continue to misapply the applicable standard for such protective orders. Garrity talks about one such ruling, just issued, that once again applied an outdated and legally erroneous standard. Given the ease with which deposition transcripts and recordings can be instantly posted online - and in light of the fact that many parties and foes do exactly that - Garrity argues that you should actively and routinely consider the use of a protective order to limit the non-judicial circulation and use of deposition testimony.
SHOW NOTES
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, et al., 2023 WL 2890152, Case No,. CV-

25,805 Listeners

3,214 Listeners

1,943 Listeners

9,570 Listeners

676 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

745 Listeners

56,536 Listeners

185 Listeners

5,552 Listeners

28 Listeners

61,492 Listeners

15,955 Listeners

19,768 Listeners

29 Listeners