
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Trent and Tim open the episode by discussing the controversy surrounding Dan Dakich's appearance at the Upstairs Pub, expressing sympathy for the bar's social media manager who is "taking all the arrows". They quickly pivot to the latest College Football Playoff rankings, where Indiana held its #2 spot, effectively guaranteeing a top-four seed even with a future loss to Ohio State. The hosts analyze the media "battle lines," noting the clear bias between the SEC-focused ESPN and the Big Ten-focused Fox/CBS , and they express concern over Ohio State's "flip the switch" mentality, suggesting they haven't truly been tested.
The conversation then turns to the "revenge game" against Wisconsin, referencing both an infamous 83-20 loss in 2010 and Luke Fickell's past win over IU with Cincinnati. They dismiss Wisconsin as "not feisty" and joke that the only way Indiana could lose is via a "catastrophic event". Instead, they frame the game as a chance for the Hoosiers to refine their passing game chemistry and get crucial reps for young defensive backs in preparation for the playoffs. To cap it off, Tim predicts an 84-0 shutout as payback for 2010, while Trent takes the Hoosiers in a 63-0 blowout.
By Trent McGee5
66 ratings
Trent and Tim open the episode by discussing the controversy surrounding Dan Dakich's appearance at the Upstairs Pub, expressing sympathy for the bar's social media manager who is "taking all the arrows". They quickly pivot to the latest College Football Playoff rankings, where Indiana held its #2 spot, effectively guaranteeing a top-four seed even with a future loss to Ohio State. The hosts analyze the media "battle lines," noting the clear bias between the SEC-focused ESPN and the Big Ten-focused Fox/CBS , and they express concern over Ohio State's "flip the switch" mentality, suggesting they haven't truly been tested.
The conversation then turns to the "revenge game" against Wisconsin, referencing both an infamous 83-20 loss in 2010 and Luke Fickell's past win over IU with Cincinnati. They dismiss Wisconsin as "not feisty" and joke that the only way Indiana could lose is via a "catastrophic event". Instead, they frame the game as a chance for the Hoosiers to refine their passing game chemistry and get crucial reps for young defensive backs in preparation for the playoffs. To cap it off, Tim predicts an 84-0 shutout as payback for 2010, while Trent takes the Hoosiers in a 63-0 blowout.

390 Listeners

188 Listeners

125 Listeners

11 Listeners

48 Listeners

37 Listeners

18 Listeners

29 Listeners

12 Listeners

43 Listeners

68 Listeners

5 Listeners

3 Listeners

12 Listeners

8 Listeners