
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remember “18 reasons for 18 years?” Well, so did the Biden Commission, and as they reject court packing, they flirt with the 18 year plan. A few voices are raising in the media and even some on the commission, so we review their arguments and analyze their possible merits. A big question - can it be implemented by statute, or is a constitutional amendment required? No surprise that Akhil has a clear opinion on this. If this happens, you heard it here first - or rather, you read it first back in 2002 when Akhil and his co-author came up with it.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
375375 ratings
Remember “18 reasons for 18 years?” Well, so did the Biden Commission, and as they reject court packing, they flirt with the 18 year plan. A few voices are raising in the media and even some on the commission, so we review their arguments and analyze their possible merits. A big question - can it be implemented by statute, or is a constitutional amendment required? No surprise that Akhil has a clear opinion on this. If this happens, you heard it here first - or rather, you read it first back in 2002 when Akhil and his co-author came up with it.

3,554 Listeners

669 Listeners

1,102 Listeners

2,011 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

32,346 Listeners

6,609 Listeners

7,210 Listeners

4,656 Listeners

5,816 Listeners

3,914 Listeners

3,344 Listeners

16,145 Listeners

744 Listeners

8,773 Listeners