Evan & Tiki

MLB’s package situation is a total headache: do you need the ESPN app, what does the bundle actually get you, and why does nobody seem to know the real price? With spring training kicking off, the guys talk Big Mac’s very “serious” spring training party, why this moment matters (the offseason is finally over), and whether MLB is botching the messaging to fans right before baseball returns. Plus, they rewind to the crew’s Yankees offseason “wish list” from November and compare it to reality, as Cashman basically brings back the same roster. Is “Run It Back” a smart bet on internal improvement, or a lazy gamble that leaves real holes? And wait… Opening Day on Netflix? Good luck explaining that to everyone’s dad.

The final hour of Evan & Tiki opens with spring training controversy as Yankees fans erupt over Mets pitcher Luke Weaver arriving at camp with a Yankees bag, sparking a broader debate on why the Yankees get mocked more than any team in sports. The guys react to Isiah Kiner-Falefa’s comments about preferring to face the Yankees in the playoffs, discuss institutionalized Yankee hate, and whether it’s earned. Then the show pivots to the NFL with a deep dive into Deshaun Watson’s future after his remaining lawsuits are dismissed, including a heated debate on whether the Jets should take a flier on the former elite quarterback versus pursuing Derek Carr. Calls pour in on reputation, risk, and what Jets fans are willing to tolerate. Plus, Knicks talk featuring Josh Hart’s refreshing self-awareness, breaking Mets bullpen news, Justin Verlander returning to Detroit, and a critical Yankees discussion on Anthony Volpe, service time manipulation, and why fans may not see him for a while. Classic Evan & Tiki chaos to close out the show.

The conversation quickly moves past the Luke Weaver Yankees bag debate and into a much bigger question. Should the Jets even consider Deshaun Watson if he becomes available? The guys break down Watson’s fall from elite quarterback to damaged asset, how the legal cloud has changed, and whether time away from the chaos could help him rediscover his game. They also explain why any Jets move, especially one this controversial, is guaranteed to be laughed at regardless of logic, context, or upside.

After giving it 36 hours to breathe, the show goes full “Cinco de Luncho” and ranks the five worst Super Bowls of our lifetimes, chaos included. Evan, Tiki, and Morash each reveal their lists from No. 5 to No. 1, comparing classic blowouts like Giants-Ravens, Seahawks-Broncos at MetLife, Cowboys-Bills, and Patriots-Rams, plus newer disasters that still feel fresh.

Along the way, they debate what actually makes a Super Bowl “bad.” Is it the final score, how you felt in the moment, or whether there was anything memorable at all? They get into the 90s dud era, the difference between “historic defense” and “unwatchable football,” and why this most recent game might end up remembered as the “Drake Maye game” years from now.

Plus, callers jump in with forgotten all-time stinkers, and the conversation spirals into why the NFC owned the Super Bowl for over a decade and how that shaped an entire generation’s view of the league.

The Yankees officially chose the most polarizing path possible: run it back. With the offseason over, we rewind to November and replay everyone’s original Yankees plans to see just how far off the front office went from fan expectations. From dream scenarios involving Alex Bregman, Josh Naylor, Steven Kwan, Sandy Alcantara, and bullpen reinforcements, to the reality of Cody Bellinger returning and almost nothing else changing, the gap is glaring.

So what does it actually mean that nearly the entire roster is back? Is Brian Cashman betting on internal growth, better health, and fewer October failures? Or did the Yankees miss a real opportunity to raise their playoff ceiling? We break down the leadoff problem, bullpen concerns, roster stagnation, and whether believing in improvement from Volpe, Dominguez, Rice, Wells, and others is enough to justify one of the most extreme “run it back” seasons in modern Yankees history.

It is time for Posted & Toasted, where the crew plays a classic guessing game using old tweets and posts that feel a little too confident in hindsight. From thinking Olympic sports look way easier than they are, to wild takes about curling, luge, bobsledding, and ice skating, the guys debate which host fired off each post. The conversation drifts into winter hats worn in August, why certain things are oddly comforting, and whether anyone actually could medal in a parallel parking Olympics. Plenty of laughs, self-awareness, and classic show banter packed into one segment.

What starts as a simple caller debate turns into a full-on on-air fight between Evan Roberts and Shaun Morash over one loaded question: is Drake Maye already ahead of Eli Manning. Evan argues the narrow “through two years” case, while Shaun pushes back hard on why that framing is cheap, misleading, and disrespectful to what Eli actually accomplished when it mattered most.

The segment spirals into shouting, interruptions, and pure sports radio chaos as Boston hype collides with New York legacy, playoff performance vs regular season numbers, and why comparing careers through tiny windows misses the entire point. A heated reminder that Eli still lives rent free in Patriots fans’ heads and that nothing ignites a show faster than quarterbacks, rings, and revisionist history.

After a blowout loss, Will Campbell reveals he played through a torn knee ligament and skipped the podium. Was he being honest or did it come off as making excuses. The guys debate whether athletes are better off saying nothing after tough losses and why injury explanations always land differently when they come from the player himself.

The conversation then shifts to a major NFL offseason topic sparked by Adam Schefter, as reports suggest at least one team wants to extend how far into the future draft picks can be traded. Would moving from three years to five years help teams or completely mess with accountability. Plus, thoughts on proposed rule changes like replacing the onside kick with fourth-and-long and why some ideas sound smarter in theory than reality.

The Derek Carr-to-the-Jets idea goes from rumor to “wait a second…” as the show lays out three pieces of evidence from Carr’s own podcast that make it sound like he is absolutely open to New York. He praises Garrett Wilson, gushes about Aaron Glenn, and even shouts out Jets fans in a story that somehow involves a Henry Ruggs bomb and a charity donation wave.

Then the conversation widens: if Carr is truly healthy and wants to play, is he the perfect bridge who finally buys the Jets time to develop a young QB the right way? Plus, callers weigh in on whether Tom Brady’s famous “you’re sticking with that guy over me?!” was aimed at Carr or Jimmy Garoppolo, why that matters for a potential Raiders reunion, and how the 2027 draft hype could change the way teams think about trading picks.

And at the end, the looming question returns: with all these moving parts, is Carr actually the most realistic Jets answer, or just the latest offseason rabbit hole?

The next big football story in New York might be the Jets, not the Giants. While the Giants feel “done” after locking in their coach and QB plan, the Jets are staring at a total quarterback reset with Aaron Glenn back, Frank Reich running the offense, and zero easy answers on the market.

Then a weekend report lights the fuse: Derek Carr is seriously considering a return, his shoulder is reportedly fully healthy, and the Saints still hold his rights. Is Carr the smart “bridge” the Jets actually need, or is this just another offseason mirage? Plus, why Carr vs Kirk Cousins is a real debate, how the Raiders could complicate everything, and the moment the conversation flips into “wait… does Carr actually want to be a Jet?”