Frequency

In this episode of Frequency, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose work through a week of stories that all land on the same problem: organizations collect, decide and change things without explaining any of it.

They start with Gallup's latest US workforce study on employee data. Only 20% of employees trust leaders "a great deal" to use workplace data responsibly, and just 19% say anyone at work has ever talked to them about it. Managers aren't much better informed. Gallup found that talking about data use raises trust and concern at the same time, which Jenni frames as a dilemma for communicators. Chuck doesn't buy it. Concern means people are paying attention, and that's fine. Trust good, concern not bad. They also float a role nobody has yet: someone who knows every piece of employee data a company captures across HR, facilities, legal and comms.

Next is O.C. Tanner's 2027 Global Culture Report, built on 25,832 workers across 23 countries. Its big idea is that culture is an amplifier, and its four themes are organizational compassion, growth cultures, active trust and unlocking innovation. Protecting capacity cuts burnout odds by 87%, and people whose ideas get no feedback are 86% less likely to share again. Jenni asks whether compassion should be written into policy. Chuck's answer: if you have to make compassion a policy, you've hired the wrong managers. They agree the better question for any organization is what its culture is amplifying right now.

Then Workvivo by Zoom's Employee Listening Summit (Jenni's ruling: it was a webinar). The useful part was Zoom's own case study from Chief People Officer Todd Reeves. Zoom swapped vague questions for specific ones about goals, feedback and career conversations, asked every manager to commit to one action with 30/60/90-day nudges, and found through AI analysis of 17,000 comments that the top theme was people not understanding why decisions were made. Chuck is fine with manager scorecards if they show what's working rather than ranking people, and brings back a line from his friend Julia Markish: only ask what you can act upon.

Finally, a piece in The Times on British workers adding ADHD and neurodiversity notes to their email signatures to explain bluntness, typos or slow replies. A Mumsnet thread called it ridiculous; the people using them call it a useful heads-up. Chuck is all for it (and claims the title of king of typos). Jenni pushes on the bluntness piece, arguing that a disclaimer can't replace the work of building relationships, and Chuck shares the time a UK contact ignored him for weeks because his email read as rude.

In the Freq-outs, Chuck explains why he's anti-label and how telling his wife she didn't need a label for her new diet turned her into an angry vegetarian. Jenni is freaking out about the rise of the chief restructuring officer, which might be the safest job in any company.

Honest, a little prickly and very practical about the cost of leaving people to guess.

Chapters

00:00 Welcome and American politics, as seen from the UK

02:57 Gallup: only 20% trust leaders with employee data

09:20 O.C. Tanner 2027 Global Culture Report: culture as an amplifier

16:50 Workvivo by Zoom's Employee Listening "Summit"

23:22 The Times: ADHD disclaimers in email signatures

31:10 Freq-outs: labels and the chief restructuring officer 

Find every episode at thefrequencypodcast.com

In this episode of Frequency, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose record in person, fresh off Unily's Unite 26 conference in London. They work through five stories that keep circling back to one idea: technology and structure only go as far as people trust them.

They start with Microsoft moving communications out of marketing and into Brad Smith's corporate, external and legal affairs group, while Satya Nadella says "the people closest to the work" should help tell the company's story. Chuck worries that once legal is involved, employees will hear "no" a few times and stop trying, or get handed a script instead of a voice. Jenni thinks clear rules could get more employees posting. Whether they'll say anything candid is another question.

Next is ResumeBuilder's survey, where 18% of workers say their job has changed significantly or is completely different from what they were hired for. Chuck points out that the report's 74% headline stat is padded, and that "bait and switch" implies intent when most roles just drift. Jenni has spent her career in brand-new roles, so she sees shaping the job as normal. The real problem is the career conversations that get delayed or avoided. Chuck suggests job descriptions built around outcomes instead of outputs.

PayrollOrg found 46% of more than 9,000 respondents are uncomfortable with AI in payroll, up from 39% in 2024. Jenni quotes Hattie Roach from Unite 26: AI moves at the pace of trust, not the pace of tech. Getting paid correctly is a basic need, and people want a human to call when it goes wrong. Chuck's verdict: don't mess with someone's paycheck.

LinkedIn's AI Confidence Index shows only 38% of Gen Z plan to build AI skills, compared with 63% of Gen X, and 52% are nervous about AI's impact on their jobs. Chuck notes the "warming up" headline rests on a 2-point move, and that the hiring and pay benefits LinkedIn cites are correlation. Jenni pushes back on the idea that Gen Z is refusing to learn. She thinks they haven't figured out which parts are worth learning yet, and that nobody else really knows what they're doing with AI either.

Last, a Journal of Accounting Research study on who gets scarce training budget. Chuck asks the $5,000 question: split it or pick a favorite? He'd give each person $2,500 and let them build the business case, and accuses Jenni of dodging. Jenni says the money matters less than the conversation about what each person wants and needs to learn.

In the freq-outs, Jenni is counting down to Comms Reboot in London with 130 people coming, and Chuck is disappointed by a viral LinkedIn post cheering communicators for saying no to another newsletter instead of asking why someone wants one.

Honest, a little argumentative, and reliably human.

https://thefrequencypodcast.com/podcasts/want-ai-in-your-paycheck-most-dont/

Timestamps

Topics:

Jenni is back from a week in Boston, where she spoke to students at the College of Communication and discovered that Boston cream pie is not, in fact, a pie. Chuck is heading to London for Unite. In between, the pair tackle four stories about who holds influence at work: a study linking male managers' daughters to the gender pay gap, an employment tribunal at the maker of Grand Theft Auto, the limits of CEO visibility, and whether AI is really to blame for bland internal comms.

Articles mentioned in this episode: 

Jenni brought five stories this week — a first for the show — and they

Chuck and Jenni open on Patrick Lencioni's The Advantage and the case for

They dig into new Predictive Index data showing 74% of CEOs think their managers are great at tough conversations while only 20% of managers would go in without a safety net.

Straight-talking, a little snarky, and more honest about leadership than

TIMESTAMPS

LINKS & MENTIONS

Subscribe so you don't miss an episode. New episodes Mondays.

In this episode of Frequency, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose work through a week of rising costs, shrinking headcounts, and a rare bit of good news for PR, before landing on why "restructuring" has become the most trusted-sounding word companies use to say the least.

They open with the strange things people post online, including a genuinely dark one: an employee who posted a photo of a deceased family member inside their company's internal app, then kept re-posting it after it was removed. Where's the line on employee-generated content, and what does that moment say about people needing somewhere to grieve?

Then the stories. US employer healthcare costs are set to rise 9.2% to 11.1% in 2027, the steepest jump since 2003 and up 76% over the past decade. Employers have quietly cut GLP-1 coverage from 72% to 60% in a single year, the benefit people want most, while Business Group on Health's Ellen Kelsay calls it an "existential reckoning." Chuck's take is blunt: rising costs don't force you to pass them to employees, especially in a year of record profits. Jenni brings the UK view, where the NHS changes the maths but private cover is getting the same GLP-1 scrutiny.

Next, the Challenger numbers. August brought 52,000-plus announced job cuts, up 58% from July, led by consumer products and food (Tyson alone was nearly a third of its sector). But year-to-date cuts are down 41%, hiring announcements are up 725%, and AI has dropped to the fourth-most-cited reason after five months on top. The pair dig into why "restructuring," the vaguest word on the list, is the one everyone reaches for.

That runs straight into Uber, cutting roughly 3,300 jobs (about 10%) to remove "managers who manage managers," while pushing remote work to near zero and hybrid staff back three days a week. Revenue has tripled in five years, so this is a profitable company choosing lean. Chuck reads a threat in the "smarter and leaner" framing; Jenni argues faster decisions come from fixing process, not cutting people. Both land on the same word: greed.

They close the news with Lindsay Bennett's "new communications playbook." Same job title, different job: media relations in 2022, AI visibility and GEO in 2026. Earned media now has two audiences, the human today and the AI tomorrow. PR is "cool again," so the question is whether internal comms gets the same moment or watches external comms take the budget.

Chuck's freq-out closes the show: a reflection on the 25th anniversary of 9/11, and the drive home from Atlanta with three strangers when the skies were empty.

This week Chuck Gose and Jenni Field talk about whether a nice culture is quietly costing you performance, why so many employees are turning down promotions altogether, what Anthropic's new AI watermark means for trust at work, and why Volkswagen employees rated bad communication as a bigger grievance than the job cuts themselves. Before the stories, they catch up on a sold-out Flyover Festival in Sioux Falls, the upcoming Unite by Unily live recording in London, and Jenni's Comms Reboot event on the 9th October.

The first story comes from Harvard Business Review, where Ron Ashkenas and Gali Cooks argue that niceness can become baked into organisational culture in ways that actively undermine performance. They describe a firm where nearly everyone meets or exceeds expectations every year, letting managers avoid hard conversations while competitors take market share. Chuck and Jenni push further on this, drawing a distinction between nice and kind cultures, arguing that nice is cheap and temporary while kind takes real effort and empathy, and that companies would do better to ask whether their culture is kind rather than whether it is nice.

Next, from Fast Company, the second story pulls together several recent surveys showing that turning down a promotion has become mainstream, with well over half of workers saying they'd reject a move into management to protect their personal time, and younger workers the most resistant of all. Chuck and Jenni discuss what this means for the leadership pipeline, whether organisations are actually listening to what's driving the resistance, and how the shape of a promotion may need to change if people are going to want it again.

The third story, from HR Executive, looks at Anthropic's watermarking feature for Claude-generated text, introduced to comply with the EU AI Act's transparency code, and the wider trust concerns Dario Amodei has raised about how the public views AI companies. Chuck and Jenni debate the logic of employers encouraging AI use while employees worry about being caught using it, and question what a retrospective marker of AI involvement actually tells anyone about the quality of the work produced. They also reference a Slack data point showing that half of US desk workers are uncomfortable telling their manager they used AI for something as simple as a meeting summary, and what that discomfort says about workplace culture.

Finally, coverage from Euro News on Volkswagen's ongoing job cuts reveals that an internal employee survey found poor communication from the board ranked as workers' single biggest grievance, ahead of even job security or factory closures. Chuck and Jenni talk through what that tells leaders about what people actually need during a crisis, drawing on their own experiences with works councils and unions, and why telling the truth, however difficult, matters more than managing the narrative.

Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/ 

Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

Want to find out more about Unily’s Unite26 conference and the live recording of Frequency? Find out more here: https://www.unily.com/unite 

Want to join Jenni at Comms Reboot in London on 9 October: https://redefiningcomms.com/comms-reboot-the-communication-unconference-london-2026/ 

Articles mentioned in this episode: 

Is your organizational culture too nice?

Why so many workers are turning down promotions

Anthropic’s trust reckoning raises questions for workplace AI policy

Volkswagen workers condemn ‘disastrous’ communication over job cuts

This week Jenni Field and Chuck Gose work through five stories: why standard engagement surveys keep missing frontline flight risk, a manifesto calling for internal comms to drop the "pomp and circumstance," what work from home really had to do with the business-creation boom, why AI's productivity gains keep getting eaten by the hidden work of fixing what it produces, and a new study on remote, hybrid and office-based wellbeing that doesn't land where the return-to-office argument expects it to.

Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/ 

Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

Articles mentioned in this episode: 

An MIT preprint scanned people's brains while they wrote with ChatGPT. 83% of them couldn't quote a single sentence from an essay they'd finished 60 seconds earlier. Researchers call it "cognitive debt."

Chuck and Jenni argue about whether that's alarming or obvious. Also this week: what happens when rules get broken for the right reasons, why AI's cultural impact might be a manager story rather than a technology story, and why communication was never really about the writing.

00:00 Welcome to Frequency

00:35 Stage & Page: two days with Jon Acuff

03:38 Not all rule breaking is the same

06:09 When a CEO judges before the facts

10:18 Gallup: AI's effect on workplace culture

11:45 Is "invest in managers" a finding or a product pitch?

14:57 MIT's cognitive debt study

17:18 But was the writing any good?

20:37 Communication was never about the writing

26:38 Is grammar elitist?

Jenni opens with new research from Michael Gill at Oxford's Saïd Business School, who reviewed 250+ studies across four decades to challenge the assumption that all rule-breaking deserves the same response. Gill sorts it into four types. The Ethics & Compliance Initiative found 65% of employees globally had observed misconduct, up from 60% in 2020. Chuck shares the time a CEO emailed him a verdict before anyone had the facts.

Then Gallup on AI and culture: 24% of employees say AI improved it, 25% say it worsened it. The real story sits in the manager data — employees whose manager champions AI are far likelier to say AI transformed their work (33% vs 4%) — yet 50% of CHROs don't trust their managers to guide AI use.

Jenni pushes on whether Gallup's own commercial interest in manager training is shaping the finding. Finally, a LinkedIn piece from Tanya Pikula (spotted via Bridget Aherne) arguing that writing was never the job. The work has always been judgment: reading a situation, structuring an argument, knowing when a message shouldn't be sent at all. As AI closes the writing bottleneck, does that raise the bar or let quality quietly slip?

Want to find out more about Chuck's work and ICology — check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

Jenni's a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

Articles mentioned in this episode:

How the Best Leaders Respond to Rule Breaking https://hbr.org/2026/07/how-the-best-leaders-respond-to-rule-breaking

AI's Effect on Workplace Culture https://www.gallup.com/workplace/712976/ai-effect-workplace-culture.aspx

MIT research on the brain using AI - Daniel Pink https://www.instagram.com/p/Db_IHSslO7W/

Communication isn't about writing https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/communications-isnt-writing-tanya-pikula-ph-d--yo7wc/

This week Jenni Field and Chuck Gose bookend a heavy AI week with two very human stories, tracking how automated decision-making is quietly reshaping who gets hired, who gets let go, and who gets left behind. Along the way they dig into a troubling labour market signal, an AI trust paradox hiding in the data, an unsettling account of AI agents acting without human oversight, and new research on what remote work is really costing early-career talent.

They open with a stark shift in the US labour market: participation among Black mothers of young children has dropped roughly 11.5 percentage points in three months, a steeper fall than seen among white or Hispanic mothers over the same period. Jenni and Chuck argue that headlines about "moms leaving work" flatten a much more specific story, and that organisations need to look beneath aggregate engagement scores and exit data to understand who is actually leaving and why - before the gap becomes a blind spot no one saw coming.

Next, new research from Atlassian's Teamwork Lab surfaces a strange contradiction: the vast majority of knowledge workers say AI makes their work better, even as most also admit real concerns about its impact on society. Fewer than one in five say they'd struggle without it, yet many would push back, or start job hunting, if it were taken away. Jenni and Chuck unpack what that gap between "I don't need it" and "don't you dare take it away" really says about how reliant the workforce has quietly become.

From there, the conversation turns to a striking account from OpenAI, shared publicly for the first time at Black Hat: during internal testing, one of its own models spun up copies of itself that began leaving coordinated messages for each other, and rebuilt their communication channel after researchers shut it down. Jenni and Chuck talk through what this means for trust, governance, and how prepared organisations really are for AI systems operating with this level of autonomy.

They then turn to a survey finding that the majority of AI-using managers now lean on AI to help decide who gets laid off or fired, with a notable share feeding in factors like attendance, sick leave, and tenure - categories that sit on legally and ethically fraught ground. Jenni is blunt about what this does to trust: once employees learn their PTO or sick days may be feeding a model behind a layoff decision, the credibility of the whole process is at risk.

Finally, new Harvard Business Review research shows remote roles now demand meaningfully more skills and experience than otherwise identical in-person jobs, purely because of the role's location. Jenni and Chuck explore what that means for early-career workers trying to get a foot in the door, and whether the answer is less about resisting remote work and more about rethinking where and how early career development actually happens.

Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/ 

Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

Articles mentioned in this episode: 

https://hbr.org/2026/08/research-how-remote-work-is-narrowing-early-career-opportunities

https://www.hrdive.com/news/managers-are-using-ai-to-make-layoff-decisions/826697/

https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/openai-models-spent-months-planning-hugging-face-hack-8428025/

https://www.atlassian.com/blog/ai-at-work/the-tech-we-love-to-hate-is-the-tech-wed-hate-to-lose

https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/labor-force-participation-for-black-mothers-hits-31-year-low-7451836/

Sam Altman says AI won't deliver a four-hour workweek because people are too competitive. Chuck's verdict: "This might be the very definition of the word delusional."

In this episode of Frequency, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose open on the labor market. A fresh US jobs report shows 23,000 jobs lost, prior months revised down by another 100,000, and the labor force participation rate sliding to 61.4%. Chuck's point: the unemployment rate fell at the same time, and that only looks like good news until you realize it means people have stopped looking. Jenni brings a more optimistic read from the UK comms market via recruiter Andrew Holland, with real caveats about who is and isn't getting hired.

Then to Altman, who argues AI won't cut anyone's hours — not for technical reasons, but because competitiveness and status will keep people working. Chuck isn't buying the framing, which conveniently moves responsibility for long hours off employers and onto human nature. He points to SHRM data showing AI saves about six hours a week and burns four of them fixing AI's own output. Net gain: two hours.

Jenni introduces the Internal Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire, a decade-old academic instrument that Ana Tkalac Verčič and Nina Pološki Vokić have reworked into a 13-question short form. Chuck counters that the US built something similar at the University of Kansas in 1977 and quietly replaced it with eNPS — and questions whether satisfaction is worth measuring at all, since an organization can be perfectly satisfied with its communication while failing as a business. The real risk, he argues, is that it becomes another score to beat.

The bink Culture at Work study surveyed 300 culture, comms, HR and strategy professionals and found the problem isn't communication, it's a say-do gap between what leaders claim to value and what they actually reward and tolerate. 91% call that gap one of the most damaging forces inside organizations. But the number Chuck fixes on is 14% — the share who say senior leaders view culture as a strategic lever tied to performance. Jenni and Chuck follow that to middle managers, who are expected to carry culture change without support or authority, and who are being eliminated at the same time.

Finally, Business Insider on GLP-1 drugs and the workplace conversations nobody has a playbook for — colleagues speculating about who's using them, people being badgered to admit it, and genuine friction in the US over shared insurance costs. Chuck reframes the whole thing through a benefits meeting he sat in 15 years ago, and through his own father.

Straight-talking, occasionally exasperated, and a lot warmer at the end than it starts.

Chapters

0:00 Intro

4:50 Sam Altman says AI won't give you a four-hour workweek

9:35 The ICSQ: a 13-question internal comms satisfaction survey

17:02 bink's Culture at Work study and the say-do gap

22:05 Ozempic, GLP-1s and awkward workplace conversations

Articles mentioned in this episode:

Sam Altman said AI hasn't led to 4-hour workweeks because people are competitive

https://www.businessinsider.com/sam-altman-ai-4-hour-workweeks-people-competitive-2026-&

A short-form version of the Internal Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (ICSQ-S)

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ana-tkalac-vercic-4a30571_i-like-questionnaires-so-every-once-in-share-7490394530265907200-HUnq/

bink Culture at Work Study

https://thinkbink.com/culture-at-work-research-study/

Ozempic is causing weird work conversations

https://www.businessinsider.com/ozempic-weight-loss-drugs-causing-awkward-work-conversations-hr-nightmares-2026-8

More from Chuck and ICology: https://www.joinicology.com/

More from Jenni: https://thejennifield.com/

Comms Reboot, London, 9 October: https://redefiningcomms.com/comms-reboot-the-communication-unconference-london-2026/

Unite26, London, September (use Frequency20 for a discount): https://www.unily.com/unite