
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Host Dr. Jay Goldstein welcomes Dr. Deborah Proctor, professor of medicine in the section of digestive diseases and medical director of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program at Yale University School of Medicine, to provide an overview of common female gastroenterological disorders. They discuss which gastroenterological disorders present differently in women than in men. How do pelvic surgeries, such as C-sections or hysterectomies, affect colon cancer screening efficacy in women? And what factors increase a woman's chance of developing irritable bowel syndrome or Barrett's esophagus?
Incidents of Clostridium difficile, or C.diff, are increasing in the US. Are patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease more at risk for developing C. difficile infection than other patients? Is this due to an increased use of antibiotics in hospitals, or are other factors playing a role? Join host Dr. Jay Goldstein as he welcomes Dr. Christian Stone, associate professor of medicine at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, to discuss the recent trends of C. difficile infections among inflammatory bowel disease patients.
It's currently recommended that patients at average risk for colorectal cancer repeat a colonoscopy every 10 years. Is the 10-year interval appropriate for average-risk patients, or would patients benefit from more frequent colonoscopies? What evidence do we have to support the idea that more frequent colonoscopies would provide more accurate screening? Or, would a shorter intervals between colonoscopies unnecessarily increase cost and inconvenience, without much added benefit? Dr. Mark DeLegge hosts a point-counterpoint discussion. Dr. David Lieberman, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, supports the standard interval, while Dr. Andrew Chan, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, challenges the idea that a screening every 10 years is appropriate for most average-risk patients.
What are the advantages to each of the two main types of obesity surgeries— gastric bypass and lap band surgery? How do the recovery times, efficacy and potential complications compare? Host Dr. Mark DeLegge welcomes Dr. T. Karl Byrne, professor of surgery and medical director of the Bariatric Surgery Center at the Medical University of South Carolina, to discuss the role of the gastric bypass and lap band procedures in treating obesity. Are some patients clear candidates for one procedure over the other? And how is a third procedure — the sleeve gastrectomy — becoming another attractive option for treating obesity?
It's currently recommended that patients at average risk for colorectal cancer repeat a colonoscopy every 10 years. Is the 10-year interval appropriate for average-risk patients, or would patients benefit from more frequent colonoscopies? What evidence do we have to support the idea that more frequent colonoscopies would provide more accurate screening? Or, would a shorter intervals between colonoscopies unnecessarily increase cost and inconvenience, without much added benefit? Dr. Mark DeLegge hosts a point-counterpoint discussion. Dr. David Lieberman, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, supports the standard interval, while Dr. Andrew Chan, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, challenges the idea that a screening every 10 years is appropriate for most average-risk patients.
What are the advantages to each of the two main types of obesity surgeries— gastric bypass and lap band surgery? How do the recovery times, efficacy and potential complications compare? Host Dr. Mark DeLegge welcomes Dr. T. Karl Byrne, professor of surgery and medical director of the Bariatric Surgery Center at the Medical University of South Carolina, to discuss the role of the gastric bypass and lap band procedures in treating obesity. Are some patients clear candidates for one procedure over the other? And how is a third procedure — the sleeve gastrectomy — becoming another attractive option for treating obesity?
Fecal immunochemical testing (or FIT testing) replaces the older stool guaiac test in the recent colorectal cancer screening guidelines. What's the advantage to FIT testing? Is there a place for fecal DNA testing in the realm of colorectal cancer screening methods right now, or does this procedure need further revision? Host Dr. Mark DeLegge discusses the newest developments in colorectal cancer screening technologies with Dr. Douglas Rex, distinguished professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine. Is CT colonography also a viable screening option?
Fecal immunochemical testing (or FIT testing) replaces the older stool guaiac test in the recent colorectal cancer screening guidelines. What's the advantage to FIT testing? Is there a place for fecal DNA testing in the realm of colorectal cancer screening methods right now, or does this procedure need further revision? Host Dr. Mark DeLegge discusses the newest developments in colorectal cancer screening technologies with Dr. Douglas Rex, distinguished professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine. Is CT colonography also a viable screening option?
From the publisher's feed

135 Listeners

69 Listeners

1 Listeners

3 Listeners

3 Listeners

0 Listeners

6 Listeners

15 Listeners

0 Listeners

3,343 Listeners