Stakeholderism presupposes the "life time value" of the consumer, this is the stake in the future held up to ensure the continued management of people, this is the shared value that can be created. We discuss.

Can a conversation about the way we produce ourselves as a consumer ever be censored? Why is this conversation foundational,? We explore this through the question we should  ask people we feel are receptive to think about life.

Economic calculation does not constitute thinking, we explore the dogmatism we are all guilty of expounding when sold on life, from purpose to value our avowed religiosity is endemic.

Money has always been a social credit system, it has just taken the totalising claim made on time to reveal the leveraging that will be actualised to make people aware the only reason we use it is because we are given no credit as people. We explore

We explore  the way the time value of money ensures economic calculation discounts thinking beyond the consumer business has to be sold on prior for any return to be even be feasible.

We explore Nietzsche's concept when time is the principle value, can we revalue time and make it any less a means it is given as, and so transcend nihilism? We explore

We explore the opportunity cost of our economising actions so what would be a civilisational enterprise to potentialise the creativity we otherwise absence when given as consumers of life.

We explore place when the value attributed to time is addressed through actions that transcend its presupposition. Can we reinvigorate place beyond the commerce or buyers journeys? We discuss

We take up the issue of growth but through a zero growth world. What has to grow to make what we do sustainable and where does the potential need to be drawn from to generate the capability to achieve this?

We explore trans-humanism through the work of Heidegger, how the enframing of time is critical to reveal the determinism offered when discussing the challenge of technology is itself a religious artefact.