
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.

377 Listeners

674 Listeners

703 Listeners

1,828 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

6,289 Listeners

6,593 Listeners

7,232 Listeners

5,799 Listeners

3,901 Listeners

3,336 Listeners

399 Listeners

335 Listeners

430 Listeners

36 Listeners