
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
732732 ratings
Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.

3,541 Listeners

376 Listeners

681 Listeners

687 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

1,512 Listeners

5,177 Listeners

4,879 Listeners

6,302 Listeners

6,590 Listeners

5,783 Listeners

3,889 Listeners

3,328 Listeners

379 Listeners

429 Listeners