
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
Will and Dan ponder the significance Court's grant of certiorari in an abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, before going on to recap some of the opinions the Court released this week. They discuss Caniglia v. Strom, a Fourth Amendment case, and what it might mean for drug-dealing senior citizens. And they explore the puzzling world of criminal-procedure retroactivity in Edwards v. Vannoy, and in particular Justice Gorsuch's bold concurrence charting a new course for federal habeas corpus law.

379 Listeners

663 Listeners

708 Listeners

1,846 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

6,623 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

399 Listeners

457 Listeners

431 Listeners

41 Listeners