Overview
I have recently been wondering about the use of abbreviations which
are built from the first letter of a word followed by a number and the
last letter. The number represents the count of letters between the
start and end letter. Thus accessibility becomes
a11y. This came to light (to me anyway) during an email
exchange with Mike Ray regarding the accessibility issues on the tag
index page on the HPR site. The website issues were resolved, but I was
left wondering how useful the term a11y is, or whether it
just jars with me!
According to the Wikipedia article
this type of word is known as a numeronym, but they may also be
referred to as alphanumeric acronyms, alphanumeric
abbreviations, or numerical contractions.
As the Wikipedia article notes these types of abbreviations are
almost always used to refer to their computing sense — such as
g11n for globalisation — in the context of computing,
not the general context.
Looking at a11y as an
example
While I sympathise with the motivation behind using
'a11y' to mean accessibility, I do find it odd and
counter-intuitive. I often find myself pondering the acceptability of
this type of abbreviation. How many other words in common English fit
patterns like this I wonder? Quite a few I would expect. How does this
affect the admissibility of such abbreviations?
Not only are they adventurously strange to my simple brain, but I
find them to be aesthetically displeasing. My experiments with the
standard Linux dictionary looking for words that fit this pattern I find
affirmatively supportive of this view. I describe this experiment
later.
Algebraically, it is to be expected that there are many dictionary
words of 13 characters which start with 'a' and end with
'y'. Looking at them allegorically, such numeronyms convey
little meaning except in very limited contexts since the motivation
seems to be to reduce the need to type long words. Alternatively, if
they were accepted by data entry software and expanded automatically a
better case could be made for applicability, but only one word could be
assigned to a numeronym.
In my mind there is a certain artificiality in the use of these
abbreviations.
You might wonder at the weird rambling nature of the above section -
this was my (small) joke to try and use many of the words that match the
a11y pattern.
Here’s the result of transforming them:
While I sympathise with the motivation behind
'a11y' to mean accessibility, I do find it odd and
counter-intuitive. I often find myself pondering the a11y
of this type of abbreviation. How many other words in common English fit
these patterns I wonder? Quite a few I would expect. How does this
affect the a11y of such abbreviations?
Not only are they a11y strange to my simple brain, but I
find them to be a11y displeasing. My experiments with the
standard Linux dictionary looking for words that fit this pattern I find
a11y supportive of this view. I describe this experiment
later.
A11y, it is to be expected that there are many
dictionary words of 13 characters which start with 'a' and
end with 'y'. Looking at them a11y, such
numeronyms convey little meaning except in very limited contexts since
the motivation seems to be to reduce the need to type long words.
A11y, if they were accepted by data entry software and
expanded a11y a better case could be made for
a11y, but only one word could be assigned to a