Residents argue license-plate readers violate privacy
Two things happen when a vehicle passes one of Beacon's license-plate readers, according to Police Chief Tom Figlia, who spoke to the City Council on Monday (Sept. 21).
If the plate is on a "hotlist" for stolen vehicles or criminal suspects, the camera generates an alert that a police officer must confirm before taking action. Second, the plate is automatically added to a database, where it is retained for 30 days unless it's part of an active investigation.
The database cannot be searched using physical descriptions, such as a driver's gender or race, and it has no facial-recognition capabilities, Figlia said.
It was the second time in two weeks that a law-enforcement official in the Highlands had defended his department's use of license-plate readers, a technology that has come under intense scrutiny as allegations of misuse and privacy breaches have spread nationwide. On Sept. 9, Putnam County Sheriff Brian Hess told members of the Legislature in Carmel that its 48 cameras are used only to solve crimes and that guardrails keep officers from using the data for anything else.
In Beacon on Monday, Figlia showed council members and a full house of spectators a screenshot from the Flock system that the department uses. "You can search license plates and vehicle descriptions, and that's it," he said. He shared a 2023 article from The Current as evidence of the city's transparency on the issue.
Data recorded by LPRs belongs to the Beacon police, which does not sell it, Figlia said. Flock Safety, the Atlanta-based company that provides 120,000 cameras to law-enforcement agencies in 49 states, has also said it does not sell consumer or camera data. Figlia suggested afterward that a doorbell camera could be more invasive than an LPR.
Beacon's agreement with Flock was approved by the City Council in January 2023. Initially a two-year contract for $21,400, it was extended later that year and runs through 2028. Two of the cameras are stationed on Route 9D, with others on Route 52, Washington Avenue and Main Street. Another is mobile. Officers can search camera photos if they are looking for a stolen car or a person suspected of a crime. The cameras are not used to enforce speed limits, Figlia said.
The Beacon Police Department withdrew from Flock's nationwide database earlier this year, citing an overload of searches unrelated to the city and the potential for outside agencies to access the information. On Monday, Figlia scrolled through screenshots showing the cameras' views of public roadways, not "people's backyards" or "what's on their phones," as he said has been alleged.
Finally, the chief listed more than two dozen incidents where Flock images had helped the department solve crimes or arrest suspects, including a sexual assault, domestic and aggravated assaults, a shooting, two hit-and-runs involving bicyclists and multiple auto hit-and-runs. In several cases, he said, Flock data helped the department locate suicidal individuals who were taken to mental health facilities.
While some of the national debate over Flock has accused agencies of colluding with federal immigration officers, Monday's meeting was mostly about privacy.
Before Figlia's presentation, a dozen residents commented; all said they oppose the city's use of Flock LPRs.
"A majority of Americans think they have the right to exist and move about freely without being spied upon and having their movements tracked by the state," said Danny Noest. "They're correct and I agree with them."
A Fishkill resident, Scott Norton, argued that "this isn't about cameras, it's about government power." He asked for information on the city's contract with Flock. "Government officials work for the people," he said. "They don't get to spend our money, build surveillance infrastructures and then tell us that the decision is already made."
More than one speaker called the devices tools of a "surveillance state." Lisette Cheresson ci...