Homeopathic Narratives: How Nature Heals

We often have preconceptions that we take for granted without questioning whether they are real or how they work.   This narrative looks at symptoms and their function in our lives, blood work while on a well-indicated constitutional remedy, adaptors from nature that help us survive on Earth, injections like Botox that are injected into our heads, and botulinum that is okay when injected into our heads, but not when we drink mothers’ milk.   These preconceptions are discussed in detail.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

Looking at the impact of genetic manipulations on the human body and soul is similar to Hahnemann’s understanding as seen in aphorism 206 in the Organon of the Medical Art where he says we need to identify which chronic disease if those symptoms are in the foreground and part of the totality.  I have found in my practice that the RNA remedy is doing wonders for people who have had RNA disruptors injected into them multiple times and as a result their well-chosen constitutional or acute remedy is not being read by the patient.  Giving the patient the remedy RNA to take when the homeopathic remedy is not doing anything will very often allow the patient’s system to read the code and the remedy begins to work.  Looking for answers to how to fix the damage done by RNA and DNA disruptors and manipulations as well as the impacts of genetic engineering on our health is something we can begin doing but will need to go to the source.  Just as we have in miasms and in organ specific disease, we should being using remedies such as healthy RNA, a homeopathically diluted and succussed remedy that can remind the body what healthy, when we need the code to help the RNA help the homeopathic remedy do its work.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

RFK, Jr said make America healthy again, and I believe this is an opportunity to do just that with the World.  The WEF does not like Trump, so whether you do or don’t like him as the next president of the USA does not matter, the world has an opportunity to become healthier again because of this antagonism felt towards Trump by the WEF, UN and WHO.  Homeopathy has been the elephant in the room since the Flexner Report, and now we can begin to reverse the catastrophic impact it has had over more than a century on all alternative natural healing modalities and begin making the World healthier by choosing natural modalities, moving away from human-boy-consumerism, and educating the masses on homeopathy and eradicating ignorance on the subject of homeopathy.  This is and always will be a large reason why I share with you.  Nature is a choice and the window of opportunity to make the world healthy again has opened up again as we stand against the forces of globalists whose agenda does not align with nature, despite their false use of supposed green and sustainable future models which are being exposed daily for the insane manipulations that they really are.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

Please excuse my cough, but its that time of year!  This episode brings us to the end of miasms as we finish off the last four: malaria, typhoid, acute and psora.  The maisms are helpful in choosing a clearer within a family of plants for example, and they help to ensure the remedy keeps the same pace as our patient.  If you are the patient, you will be able to see if a remedy is changing your pace and whether that means you should get a remedy closer to your pace of life.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

We continue on with the miasms, looking at the leprosy, sycosis and tubercular miasms and how Sankaran has helped us understand these three paces of life to better understand ourselves, but also to prescribe better indicated remedies. Well indicated remedies should include the miasmic situation to better help the patient heal.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

This narrative is part two of the series on Miasms and how they form your pace of life and a filter through which you view life, especially during stressful times. Last week we discussed the syphilitic miasm or the impossible pace.  This week we continue discussing the paces of life as they are copying mechanisms specific to the individual. In narrative 133 Sankaran’s book on these paces and his work on understanding them is a must read.  When choosing a remedy it is important to match it to the patient when choosing a constitutional remedy for their chronic state.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

We are born with a miasm which determines the pace of our life.  In Sankaran’s book, Homeopathy for Today’s World, he talks about these miasms as paces of life which is really helpful in understanding how our perception is predetermined in our DNA and determines the pace in which we get disease and the pace at which our disease develops.  The syphilitic miasm enters the DNA after it has been suppressed in previous generations and when it is the pace of life of a child, a newborn child or even before it is born there are ways that life becomes destructive, homicidal, suicidal, ulcers, total and utter devastation, despair, impossible and psychotic.  All because syphilis is dictating the pace of perception and reaction of the body to life itself. Each person has a different miasm and next week we will continue talking about them so you can better understand this aspect of the remedy choice.

Books Recommended:

Sankaran, R. Homeopathy for Today’s World – Discovering Your Animal, Mineral, or Plant Nature, Chapter 6, Healing Arts Press, Toronto, Canada. 2011

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

This is the second proving that I know of done on Ardea herodias, the Great Blue Heron.  The first was done by Jonathan Shore in California. I am sure there are more, and for those who have done one, I apologize for my ignorance.  If you have done one, please email me at [email protected].  Ignorance is easy to remedy.  Peter Fraser discusses Shore's proving and his attempts to analyze the main mental emotional perception of this heron; my focus on the other hand is on the source words that provide the characteristics of the Great Blue Heron that come from the proving, as well as an attempt to corroborate rubrics so that we can add them to the repertory.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

When including information as proving symptoms we are looking for the specific sensitivity of the substance and as a result we use both the things provers experience and those things they emphatically deny seeing: ‘didn’t see’.  When you negate an experience you are moving up the centesimal scale of denial: 30C being no denial, 200C negating it and 1M having never experienced it. This is hard with the proving information so for specific detailed repertory rubrics I used what was observed, but for general themes and topics of interest that came up during the proving I did add those experiences that were observed and then also denied.  A prover who expresses a point and then negates it is still reliable, but at a different level of posology.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.

Episode 130 is the second part of a four part write up of the McQuaby Proving of Spring 2024, a trituration proving done by six provers after making the remedy and then proving it over a month.  This part is about the words of the provers as seen in their journals and the supervisory meeting that occurred after the two week mark.  While the remedy was unknown to the provers and supervisors alike, the works of the provers begin to unravel themes and signs of both kingdom and remedy.

All views presented are based on credible sources, but they are explained through the individual’s viewpoint.  Doing your own research while integrating new information is always important when forming your own viewpoint.

The information in this podcast is not meant to address individual health needs, it is general in nature and should not be used as medical information for your health unless used in combination with your health practitioner.