
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?

5,212 Listeners

2,712 Listeners

1,516 Listeners

161 Listeners

1,012 Listeners

3,130 Listeners

2,854 Listeners

5,369 Listeners

5,329 Listeners

1,532 Listeners

2,466 Listeners

948 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,096 Listeners