
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
370370 ratings
By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?

8,625 Listeners

3,930 Listeners

1,701 Listeners

2,186 Listeners

1,512 Listeners

1,948 Listeners

3,075 Listeners

3,133 Listeners

2,875 Listeners

20,964 Listeners

5,362 Listeners

1,497 Listeners

1,572 Listeners

2,886 Listeners

12,914 Listeners