
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
By what standard do you judge what you hear or read? You see, science isn’t neutral—especially when it comes to the science of the past. The facts, the evidence, must be interpreted and your worldview drives your interpretation of that evidence.
If you start with evolution, you’re going to interpret the evidence through millions of years of chance processes. But a creationist, well, they will look at the exact same evidence and interpret it through the lens of the Bible’s history.
Ultimately your interpretation it comes down to your starting point—the perfect eyewitness account in the Bible or the imperfect word of man?

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners