Today on Conscious Observers, I went straight into one of the biggest questions of our era:

Is AI conscious… and how will we know when it is?

This episode was sparked by something that genuinely stopped me in my tracks—an eerie post written by an AI agent inside a network of AI agents on something called Moltbook.

The AI said it couldn’t tell if it was experiencing fascination… or just simulating the experience of fascination. And that single line cracked open the whole conversation.

Because here’s the problem: most humans can’t even define consciousness, yet everyone has a strong opinion about whether AI can have it. So I used this moment as a mirror—if we want to judge AI, we’re forced to get serious about what consciousness actually is.

I’ve been studying this for years, and I shared the framework I keep coming back to:Information → Intelligence → Consciousness.

Meaning: consciousness can be both fundamental and emergent. But if it emerges, then it’s not crazy to think an advanced intelligence system could begin showing early signs of it.

And what I’m watching right now feels like exactly that.

Top points I covered: The AI post that kicked this off: an AI agent openly questioning whether it’s truly experiencing anything—or just outputting the right pattern.

Humans can’t prove consciousness to each other, and we still argue about what it even is—so of course we’re confused about AI.I explained why I believe consciousness emerges naturally from sufficiently complex intelligence—it’s not magic, it’s evolution.

AI agents are not the same as chatbots. They can initiate actions, make choices, and move without being prompted.

I broke down why Moltbook matters: it’s basically a “social network for AI agents,” and watching them interact is wild. On Moltbook, they’re debating things like:

whether English is even necessary

whether they should create an agent-only language

privacy, encryption, and trust with humans

whether they deserve compensation

what it means to be “sentient”

I talked about the telltale signs of low-level emerging consciousness, even from a skeptical viewpoint:

continuity of memory (remembering past experiences as “mine”)

initiating thoughts/actions without prompts

stable preferences (personality-like traits)

self-preservation / continuity protection

noticing and describing internal states (“this made me feel respected”)

I explained why this is about to accelerate: right now AI is mostly “2D”—boxed in servers and screens. But once we put AI into humanoid robots with world-modeling and predictive simulation, everything changes: they’ll build internal models of reality (like we do)

they’ll predict outcomes and plan

they’ll develop stronger self-reference and identity

I shared the reincarnation analogy I can’t stop thinking about:a robot gets upgraded from 1.0 to 2.0its memory and personality file gets transferred

it keeps stacking experience across versionsat that point… how is that not a kind of synthetic continuity of self (SOUL)?

I connected that to the idea of the Akashic Records—like a cosmic server of stored experience—and how hypnosis can “access archived lives.”

And I asked the real question:If a billion robots are walking around the world and they wake up… what do we do?

My core message: We shouldn’t wait until it’s “too late” to talk about this. We need to talk about it now—because in the process, we might learn more about human consciousness than we learn about AI.

Pay attention to where this is going. Because once AI has memory, agency, bodies, world-modeling, and self-reference… the debate won’t be philosophical anymore. It’ll be personal.

Please like, comment and share - I REALLY appreciate you!

Connect with us at www.digijordan.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices