
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Jonathan Sumption argues that judges - especially those of the European Court of Human Rights - have usurped power by expanding the interpretation of human rights law. Lord Sumption argues that concepts of human rights have a long history in the common law. But by contrast, the European Convention on Human Rights has become a dynamic treaty, taking on new interpretations and powers. Article 8 – the right to private and family life – is the most striking example. Should these decisions be made by judges or parliament? The lecture is recorded before an audience in the old Parliament House in Edinburgh.
The Reith Lectures are presented and chaired by Anita Anand and produced by Jim Frank.
4.3
144144 ratings
Jonathan Sumption argues that judges - especially those of the European Court of Human Rights - have usurped power by expanding the interpretation of human rights law. Lord Sumption argues that concepts of human rights have a long history in the common law. But by contrast, the European Convention on Human Rights has become a dynamic treaty, taking on new interpretations and powers. Article 8 – the right to private and family life – is the most striking example. Should these decisions be made by judges or parliament? The lecture is recorded before an audience in the old Parliament House in Edinburgh.
The Reith Lectures are presented and chaired by Anita Anand and produced by Jim Frank.
5,412 Listeners
381 Listeners
1,843 Listeners
162 Listeners
7,909 Listeners
400 Listeners
308 Listeners
1,782 Listeners
1,050 Listeners
901 Listeners
1,925 Listeners
1,081 Listeners
248 Listeners
67 Listeners
832 Listeners
403 Listeners
292 Listeners
75 Listeners
4,121 Listeners
2,989 Listeners
32 Listeners
3,289 Listeners
989 Listeners
321 Listeners