
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Jonathan Sumption argues that judges - especially those of the European Court of Human Rights - have usurped power by expanding the interpretation of human rights law. Lord Sumption argues that concepts of human rights have a long history in the common law. But by contrast, the European Convention on Human Rights has become a dynamic treaty, taking on new interpretations and powers. Article 8 – the right to private and family life – is the most striking example. Should these decisions be made by judges or parliament? The lecture is recorded before an audience in the old Parliament House in Edinburgh.
The Reith Lectures are presented and chaired by Anita Anand and produced by Jim Frank.
4.3
143143 ratings
Jonathan Sumption argues that judges - especially those of the European Court of Human Rights - have usurped power by expanding the interpretation of human rights law. Lord Sumption argues that concepts of human rights have a long history in the common law. But by contrast, the European Convention on Human Rights has become a dynamic treaty, taking on new interpretations and powers. Article 8 – the right to private and family life – is the most striking example. Should these decisions be made by judges or parliament? The lecture is recorded before an audience in the old Parliament House in Edinburgh.
The Reith Lectures are presented and chaired by Anita Anand and produced by Jim Frank.
5,394 Listeners
381 Listeners
1,837 Listeners
159 Listeners
7,904 Listeners
316 Listeners
107 Listeners
501 Listeners
1,825 Listeners
1,118 Listeners
2,243 Listeners
871 Listeners
75 Listeners
2,049 Listeners
2,065 Listeners
1,054 Listeners
213 Listeners
59 Listeners
70 Listeners
723 Listeners
2,975 Listeners
3,104 Listeners
895 Listeners
48 Listeners