I Hate Talking

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 11 dives into the phrase "que sera sera" ("whatever will be, will be") and explores its meaning, origins, and philosophical implications, especially in relation to fate, control, and acceptance.

Key Points:

1. Introduction and Word of the Episode

• The episode begins with Adam unaware of the topic, creating a spontaneous and candid conversation.
• The phrase "que sera sera" is discussed as the word of the episode—a phrase meaning "whatever will be, will be," originally Italian, adopted into Spanish, and then English.
• The hosts note that the phrase is not grammatically correct in any of those languages but has become a comforting saying about accepting the future.

2. Meaning and Interpretation

• They distinguish between "it is what it is" (a past-looking phrase about acceptance) and "whatever will be, will be" (a future-oriented phrase about acceptance).
• The phrase can be comforting in times of overwhelm, suggesting acceptance of things beyond control.

3. Fatalism vs. Providence

• The hosts discuss fatalism—the belief that all events are predetermined and inevitable—and contrast it with the idea of providence, which implies a purposeful guiding force (often spiritual).
• The conversation touches on how personal beliefs shape whether one views life events as random fate or providential.

4. Chaos Theory

• Chaos theory is introduced as another worldview, illustrating how small actions (like a butterfly flapping its wings) can have large, unpredictable effects.
• The hosts debate whether chaos theory implies lack of control or interconnectedness and how it compares to fatalism and providence.
• They use examples like the movie Jurassic Park to illustrate chaos theory’s concept of sensitive dependence on initial conditions.

5. Human Desire and Control

• They reflect on how human desires and choices interact with these theories.
• Even if some outcomes are predetermined or chaotic, individuals still have agency to make choices and do "the next right thing."
• This middle ground balances acceptance of uncertainty with personal responsibility.

6. Practical Reflections

• The hosts share personal anecdotes, such as giving food to someone in need, as examples of purposeful action within uncertain outcomes.
• They discuss the emotional weight of believing every action could have massive consequences (e.g., the butterfly effect) and how that can feel overwhelming.

7. Conclusion

• No definitive conclusion is reached, but the episode emphasizes that discussing these ideas helps in understanding and processing them.
• The hosts affirm that talking—even without a clear plan or outcome—is valuable for exploring complex thoughts and feelings.

Overall, Episode 11 thoughtfully examines the phrase "que sera sera" as a lens to discuss fate, control, acceptance, and the philosophical tensions between fatalism, providence, and chaos theory. It encourages listeners to find a balance between surrendering to what will be and actively engaging in life’s choices.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 10 celebrates reaching double digits in the podcast series and focuses on the origin story ("Genesis") of the podcast itself.

Key Highlights:

• Word of the Episode: Genesis
  The hosts explore the etymology of "Genesis," tracing its roots through Hebrew (Berisheth), Latin, and Greek, where it means origin, creation, or birth. This ties into the episode's theme of beginnings—the start of their podcast journey.
• How the Podcast Began
  One host shares how the idea arose spontaneously during a casual conversation after the kids went to bed, inspired by listening to other couples’ podcasts. Coincidentally, the other host had been thinking about starting a podcast the same day, with a name, intro/outro song, and concept art already in mind. This serendipity pushed them to start immediately.
• Podcast as a Shared Project
  They discuss how podcasting has become a meaningful way to connect, create content, and share insights rather than just consume media. It’s a creative outlet and a way to intentionally engage with each other beyond daily routines.
• Podcast Consumption Habits
  The hosts reflect on their own podcast listening habits, mentioning shows like Joe Rogan, Theocast, Blurry Creatures, Weaponized, Julie La Roche, Heresy Financial. They note how podcasts are a modern evolution of radio and oral storytelling, now accessible anytime via streaming.
• Legacy and Oral Tradition
  They touch on the importance of preserving stories for future generations, sharing a personal anecdote about recording the grandfather’s war stories for their children. Podcasting becomes a modern extension of the ancient oral tradition, now preserved digitally.
• Visual vs. Auditory Learning
  The hosts discuss learning preferences, debating whether they are visual or auditory learners. They conclude that combining reading and listening enhances retention significantly, as it engages multiple senses and reduces distractions.
• Parenting Moment
  A humorous story is shared about one of their kids claiming to multitask by reading and listening simultaneously during school, but retaining only about 55-60% of the information when tested.

Overall, Episode 10 is a reflective and celebratory episode that delves into the podcast’s beginnings, the value of storytelling, and how modern technology blends with ancient traditions to share knowledge and connect people. It also explores learning styles and the joys and challenges of multitasking in everyday life.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Or send us an email at [email protected]. You need to "actively" listen to this episode. Are audio books a valid way to "read"? We explore this and many more topics in this episode. 

Episode 9 focuses on the concept of active listening, marking the first time the podcast discusses a phrase rather than a single word. The hosts explore what active listening means, how it relates to different processing styles, and the challenges people face in truly listening.

1. Definition of Active Listening

• Active listening involves fully paying attention to the speaker without preparing a response while they are talking.
• It includes understanding, reflecting on, responding to, and retaining what is said.

2. Processing Styles and Listening

• The hosts link active listening to their previous discussion on internal (nonverbal) vs. external (verbal) processors.
• They note that quiet people are often assumed to be better listeners, but sometimes they might be thinking about what to say next rather than truly listening.
• One host explains that they can listen and simultaneously prepare a response, while the other finds these processes mutually exclusive—when listening, their mind is blank and focused solely on the speaker.

3. Challenges to Active Listening

• Preparing a response can cause one to stop truly listening, effectively turning off auditory senses.
• Distractions, such as background noise or multitasking, can hinder active listening.
• Sensory sensitivities (e.g., to white noise) can make it difficult to focus on conversations.

4. Multitasking and Attention

• The hosts discuss multitasking abilities, noting that auditory and visual inputs can sometimes be managed simultaneously, but multitasking with the same type of input (e.g., two auditory tasks) is difficult.

5. Impact of Technology and Notifications

• Modern distractions like phone notifications fragment attention and make active listening harder.
• One host shares how removing message notifications from their phone homepage has improved their focus and presence during conversations and daily tasks.

6. Reading vs. Listening to Audiobooks

• The episode touches on whether audiobooks count as "reading."
• The hosts agree audiobooks are a valid way to consume written content and that studies show listening can be as effective as reading if one pays full attention.
• However, audiobooks require active focus and cannot be treated as mere background noise for effective retention.

7. Personal Reflections

• The hosts reflect on their own listening habits and abilities, including how one reads ahead when reading aloud and how migraines can affect reading comprehension but not necessarily audiobook listening.

Overall, Episode 9 delves into the complexities of active listening, highlighting how individual cognitive styles, sensory sensitivities, and modern distractions impact our ability to truly listen and engage in conversations. The discussion encourages listeners to be mindful of their listening habits and the importance of presence in communication.

Shout out to John Delony and his podcast that was used as a jumping off point for some of the ideas about distraction and attentiveness.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 8 centers around the theme of "elastic"—both as a noun (the material) and an adjective (describing something that can stretch and return to its original shape). The hosts use this as a metaphor to explore the concept of elasticity in people, particularly in how individuals process thoughts and conversations.

Key Topics Discussed:

1. Word of the Episode: Elastic

• The episode opens with a playful discussion about the word "elastic," distinguishing between the noun (the material itself) and the adjective (describing something stretchy, like elastic pants).
• This leads to a deeper metaphorical exploration of elasticity as a human trait—how people can be flexible or resilient in thought and behavior.

2. Verbal vs. Nonverbal Processing

• The hosts revisit a previous conversation about verbal processors (people who think out loud) versus nonverbal processors (those who process internally).
• They note that while "verbal processor" is a well-documented term, "nonverbal processor" is often described simply as the opposite, sometimes called internal processor versus external processor.

3. Personal Processing Styles

• One host explains how they need to talk things out loud (even to themselves) to come to conclusions, while the other thinks things through internally and speaks only after solidifying their thoughts.
• This difference has caused misunderstandings in their relationship, especially early on, but they have learned to respect and accommodate each other's styles by allowing time between initial discussion and final decision-making.

4. Implications for Communication

• The episode emphasizes the importance of recognizing these different processing styles in conversations, whether with friends, spouses, or new acquaintances.
• The hosts share experiences about how some people might need encouragement or time to open up, and how assumptions about silence or delayed responses can be misleading.

5. Reflection and Emotional Processing

• They discuss how some people verbally process shame or social interactions by talking them through, while others internalize these feelings silently.
• This leads to a reflection on how internal processors might carry emotional memories for years without sharing them, while external processors might need to vocalize to work through feelings.

6. Middle Ground Between Processing Styles

• The hosts consider whether there is a middle ground between verbal and internal processing.
• They suggest an experiment for verbal processors to try internal processing first to see how it changes their decision-making and understanding.

7. Practical Takeaways

• The episode closes with practical advice on how to navigate conversations with different processing styles:
  • Allow time for internal processors to think before expecting a response.
  • Encourage verbal processors to articulate thoughts to clarify understanding.
  • Recognize that talking and thinking are not mutually exclusive but part of a spectrum.

Overall, Episode 8 uses the metaphor of "elasticity" to explore the flexible and varied ways people process thoughts and emotions, highlighting the importance of patience and understanding in communication. It offers listeners insights into their own and others' cognitive styles and encourages empathy in conversations.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Main Theme
The episode explores the distinction and interplay between narrative (storytelling) and reasoning (facts and logic) in communication, art, and personal experience.

Key Points

• Definition of Narrative:
  The hosts define narrative as a spoken or written account of connected events—a story—which can be found in literature, art (like sculptures and pictographs), and even everyday conversation.
• Art as Narrative:
  The discussion highlights how sculptures and visual art can tell stories and evoke empathy or understanding, depending on how people relate the artwork to their own experiences or to universal aspects of the human condition.
• Narrative vs. Reasoning in Conversation:
  The hosts contrast their conversational preferences: one enjoys hearing personal stories and day-to-day experiences, while the other prefers discussions grounded in reasoning, facts, and general knowledge.
• Gender and Communication Styles:
  They discuss the idea that men might gravitate toward fact-based, role-oriented conversations, while women might focus more on narrative and shared experiences. The female host reflects on her upbringing with mostly male siblings, challenging and examining these stereotypes.
• Personal Experience and Empathy:
  The hosts acknowledge that personal background shapes how one interprets and empathizes with narratives. They discuss how their own life stories, family structures, and even the books they read as children influence their perspectives.
• Narrative in Literature:
  An anecdote is shared about the Hardy Boys series, noting that some books were written by a woman, which surprises the hosts and prompts reflection on gendered assumptions in storytelling.
• Memory and Narrative:
  The episode closes with a discussion about early memories, family stories, and how significant life events become part of personal and collective narratives.

Conclusion
The hosts conclude that both narrative and reasoning are essential for understanding ourselves and others. While people may prefer one mode over the other, meaningful conversation and empathy often emerge from engaging with both. They emphasize that talking—whether through stories or facts—is the beginning of understanding.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 What does it really mean to be a perfectionist? Episode 6 of “I Hate Talking” explores the concept of being a perfectionist, moving beyond their initial show introduction into more open-ended topics. They discuss the common perception of a perfectionist as someone who demands flawlessness and is self-critical, often with negative or positive connotations, but the dictionary simply defines a perfectionist as someone who refuses to accept any standard short of perfection.

The hosts share a personal story where one took a therapist’s survey to assess perfectionist traits versus excellence traits. The therapist challenged the guest’s denial of being a perfectionist by pointing out behaviors like always having pen and paper ready, and a fear of failure that leads to not trying at all. 

They discuss the 20-word associative survey which lists traits associated with perfectionism (e.g., idealist, fear of failure, inflexible, self-condemning) and contrasts them with traits of excellence (e.g., realistic, self-accepting, flexible, focusing on process).

Listeners are invited to take the survey themselves, scoring how many traits they identify with on each side, and then subtracting their excellence score from their perfection score to see where they fall on the spectrum. 

The hosts reflect that perfectionism is complex and not just about striving for perfection at all costs but can include avoiding effort due to fear of not achieving perfection.

The episode emphasizes that this exploration is less about labeling oneself strictly as a perfectionist or not, and more about gaining insight into personal motivations and perceptions, distinguishing between perfectionism and excellence. They conclude that understanding these nuances helps in self-awareness and growth, aligning with the show’s goal of fostering understanding through conversation.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 5 of I Hate Talking concludes their introductory 5-part series by exploring why we bother talking at all. The episode opens with the word of the episode, “posit,” which means to assume something as a fact or to put forward a statement as the basis for an argument. The hosts clarify that “posit” is about presenting an idea for consideration, not simply stopping or hesitating.

They discuss various reasons people talk: one host talks out of love and interest in others, wanting to share and hear ideas, while the other sometimes chooses silence when conversations feel unproductive or unvalued. They contrast verbal processors, who think aloud and clarify thoughts by speaking, with internal processors, who reflect deeply before speaking.

The hosts reflect on how communication styles differ—some prefer sharing knowledge and facts, others seek empathy and emotional connection. They note that talking is essential to maintain relationships and understanding, especially given life’s limited time. The episode emphasizes that despite challenges and differences in communication, talking remains the key to connection and growth.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 4 of I Hate Talking centers on the theme of time—specifically, when people hate talking. The episode begins with the word of the day, milady. 

The hosts discuss times of day when people dislike conversation, such as immediately after waking up (when some prefer silence) and late at night (when people are tired and less receptive). Cultural habits, like midday siestas in some countries, are also mentioned as times when talking is avoided.

They expand the discussion to days of the week, noting that Mondays and Sunday evenings are often disliked for serious conversations due to the start-of-week stress and “Sunday scaries.” Holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas are highlighted as times when people may dread conversations due to family tensions or hot-button topics, while New Year’s greetings and resolutions become unwelcome after January.

Finally, the hosts reflect on how age and life stages affect willingness to talk—suggesting that younger people tend to be more vocal and opinionated, while older generations may prioritize relationships over being right. The episode concludes that timing matters for good conversations, and understanding these preferences can improve communication and relationships.

Want the mug mentioned in this episode? Get it on Amazon.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 3 of I Hate Talking begins with the word of the episode: homonym—words that sound the same but may have different spellings and meanings. The hosts explore related terms like homophone (same sound, different spelling) and homograph (same spelling, different pronunciation or meaning), using examples such as “lie,” “read,” and “dessert/dessert.” They humorously acknowledge the complexity of English and the challenges it poses for learners.

The main discussion centers on where people hate talking. Common places include:

• Lines/queues: Many dislike small talk while waiting, preferring to complete their task quickly.
• Bars or concerts: Loud environments make conversation difficult; effort depends on who you’re with and the value placed on the interaction.
• Bathrooms: Social norms vary; women often chat in groups, men tend to be quieter, and conversations here can range from mundane to awkward (e.g., discussing pregnancy test results).
• Courtrooms: High-stakes situations where most people likely hate talking except professionals like lawyers and judges.

The hosts note that comfort in conversation depends on context, relationship, and personal values. They also touch on cultural differences in social interactions and how technology (like conference calls) has changed workplace communication. The episode closes with reflections on the importance of talking despite these challenges, reinforcing the podcast’s theme of understanding through conversation.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique. 

Send us Fan Mail

 Episode 2 of I Hate Talking opens with two featured words: ketogenesis—the metabolic process that produces ketone bodies as an alternative energy source for the body—and cryptocurrency, a digital currency maintained by a decentralized system using cryptography rather than a central authority. The hosts note these words reflect their personal interests and joke about future episodes featuring more themed words.

The main discussion explores topics people hate talking about, contrasting them with topics people often enjoy, such as their own lives, children, or hobbies. The hosts point out that while individuals may love discussing their interests (like keto diets or cryptocurrency), some listeners might find these subjects tedious or irrelevant. They highlight that universally avoided topics—such as religion and politics—are often skipped in casual conversation due to the risk of disagreement or conflict, especially in Western cultures.

The conversation also touches on small talk, with one host enjoying it and the other noting that many dislike repetitive or superficial exchanges. The episode concludes by noting that what people hate talking about is influenced by cultural norms, personal biases, and prior experiences, and that even within “safe” topics, there are subtopics people avoid. The hosts tease future episodes will delve further into the reasons behind these conversational aversions.

Want to buy the book called "How to Make Small Talk" mentioned in today's episode? Buy it on Amazon.

Support the show

---

Any views expressed on this podcast are those solely of the hosts and is for entertainment purposes only. None of the content is medical advice or financial advice. 

Special thanks to Tim Wright aka CoLD SToRAGE for his permission to use the song Operatique.