
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Evolutionists often accuse creationists of ignoring science. One evolutionist even called it ironic that we use the latest technology at our two attractions while denying the science behind it.
But creationists don’t ignore science. We can work side by side with evolutionists to develop new technologies or medical innovations. But where we differ is with historical science.
You see, this kind of science deals with the past and isn’t directly testable or observable. What you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence. It’s not science, it’s the evolutionary interpretation imposed on the evidence that we deny.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Evolutionists often accuse creationists of ignoring science. One evolutionist even called it ironic that we use the latest technology at our two attractions while denying the science behind it.
But creationists don’t ignore science. We can work side by side with evolutionists to develop new technologies or medical innovations. But where we differ is with historical science.
You see, this kind of science deals with the past and isn’t directly testable or observable. What you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence. It’s not science, it’s the evolutionary interpretation imposed on the evidence that we deny.

5,190 Listeners

2,573 Listeners

1,530 Listeners

177 Listeners

1,032 Listeners

3,153 Listeners

2,851 Listeners

5,423 Listeners

5,369 Listeners

1,557 Listeners

2,473 Listeners

954 Listeners

388 Listeners

2,935 Listeners

13,189 Listeners