
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Evolutionists often accuse creationists of ignoring science. One evolutionist even called it ironic that we use the latest technology at our two attractions while denying the science behind it.
But creationists don’t ignore science. We can work side by side with evolutionists to develop new technologies or medical innovations. But where we differ is with historical science.
You see, this kind of science deals with the past and isn’t directly testable or observable. What you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence. It’s not science, it’s the evolutionary interpretation imposed on the evidence that we deny.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Evolutionists often accuse creationists of ignoring science. One evolutionist even called it ironic that we use the latest technology at our two attractions while denying the science behind it.
But creationists don’t ignore science. We can work side by side with evolutionists to develop new technologies or medical innovations. But where we differ is with historical science.
You see, this kind of science deals with the past and isn’t directly testable or observable. What you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence. It’s not science, it’s the evolutionary interpretation imposed on the evidence that we deny.

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners