
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
376376 ratings
This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

3,569 Listeners

2,279 Listeners

1,107 Listeners

2,017 Listeners

6,318 Listeners

6,620 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

5,821 Listeners

580 Listeners

3,921 Listeners

3,348 Listeners

823 Listeners

16,199 Listeners

744 Listeners

8,774 Listeners