
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
376376 ratings
This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

3,546 Listeners

2,272 Listeners

1,116 Listeners

2,024 Listeners

6,310 Listeners

6,616 Listeners

7,242 Listeners

5,867 Listeners

575 Listeners

3,953 Listeners

3,364 Listeners

817 Listeners

16,587 Listeners

745 Listeners

8,462 Listeners