
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
376376 ratings
This week we continue with clips from the oral argument in the immunity case (Trump v. United States). Most of this week’s clips come from attorney Dreeben (representing the Special Counsel, and therefore the people of the United States), and some of the Justices have at him, sometimes in way Professor Amar finds wrong-headed or worse. Our own argument is brought to bear upon these controversies, and a consistent way of addressing these questions emerges. Clarity on the argument emerges. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

3,530 Listeners

2,267 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

6,623 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

617 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

818 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

746 Listeners

8,447 Listeners