Episode Overview

In this episode of the Industrial Strength Podcast, hosts Steve, Jeff, and Randy return to dive deep into the proposed updates to OSHA’s 1910.156 standard. Unlike last week's discussion on NFPA 470, this week focuses on how the proposed transformation of the fire brigade standard into a comprehensive emergency response standard could affect all emergency response units—from hazmat and fire to EMS and technical rescue.

With their typical blend of expertise, humor, and real-world insights, the team unpacks the implications of these changes, what they mean for industrial and municipal teams, and how organizations can prepare.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

• 00:37 – 01:20 | Welcome & Recap
• Hosts introduce themselves and briefly recap the previous episode’s focus on NFPA 470.
• 01:20 – 03:26 | Introduction to OSHA 1910.156 Proposed Changes
• Overview of how OSHA is proposing a major overhaul, shifting from a fire brigade focus to a broader emergency response standard.
• Early discussion on how NFPA standards are being incorporated.
• 03:27 – 06:28 | Expanded Scope of the Standard
• New inclusion of medical teams, confined space, technical rescue, and volunteer brigades.
• Debate on why OSHA is initiating this change now.
• 06:29 – 09:33 | Key Changes: From Industrial to Universal
• Impacts of merging industrial and municipal standards.
• Introduction of broader inclusivity across emergency services.
• 09:34 – 13:05 | Emergency Response Program Requirements
• Introduction of required plans tailored to facility-specific hazards.
• Challenges for small departments to implement pre-planning.
• 13:06 – 16:07 | SOPs and Real-World Limitations
• The difficulty of writing meaningful SOPs for non-standard emergencies.
• Tension between real-world fieldwork and regulatory compliance.
• 16:08 – 23:34 | Enhanced Medical Surveillance
• Breakdown of medical exam mandates and their implications.
• Costs, scheduling, and new requirements for EMS teams.
• 23:35 – 27:14 | Behavioral Health & Fitness Standards
• Introduction of behavioral health and physical fitness programs.
• Debate over fitness-for-duty standards and department size challenges.
• 27:15 – 30:29 | Documentation and Reporting Requirements
• New mandates for maintaining detailed training, exposure, and medical records.
• Discussion of the possible duration and format of required records.
• 30:30 – 34:31 | Implementation Timeline & Final Thoughts
• Public comment period is over; awaiting OSHA's rollout.
• Anticipation of a lengthy grace period and concerns for small departments.
• 34:32 – 35:42 | Teaser for Next Episode & Contact Info
• Teaser for upcoming guest and Jeff’s favorite topic: bulging drums.

Listener contact info: [email protected]

Episode Overview

In this episode of Industrial Strength Hazmat, Jeff, Randy, and Steve dive into the significant updates brought by NFPA 470, which consolidates and replaces NFPA 472 and 1072. With their signature banter and practical insight, they unpack what these changes mean for hazmat response teams, especially those in industrial environments. From the evolving role of specialists to new requirements for Incident Commanders (ICs), the team explores how these standards reshape training, qualifications, and inter-agency coordination.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

00:00 – Tech Glitches & Canadian Humor

• A rocky start, playful banter about Canada and celebrities like Jim Carrey and Alex Trebek

02:55 – Meet the Hosts

• Jeff, Randy, and Steve introduce themselves and their backgrounds in hazmat

03:42 – What Is NFPA 470?

• Explanation of the new consolidated standard
• Importance of knowing how NFPA and OSHA standards interact

05:06 – Confidence and Competency in Hazmat Calls

• The difference between experienced teams and teams with fewer reps
• Importance of proper training and readiness

06:41 – Levels of Hazmat Responders

• Awareness, Operations, Technician, and Specialist
• Defensive vs. offensive roles in hazmat response

08:23 – Evolution of the Specialist Role

• How NFPA 470 changes the scope of the "Specialist" designation
• Introduction of Specialist A, B, C—container, chemical, and liaison roles
• Increased relevance for SMEs (Subject Matter Experts)

13:29 – Challenges in Tracking Specialist Qualifications

• Need for better accountability and tracking systems
• Specialist roles must now be more clearly defined and documented

15:39 – JPRs (Job Performance Requirements) & Documentation

• Specialists writing and maintaining JPRs
• Importance of clear, vetted qualification documents for broader team access

17:27 – Continuous Improvement in the Fire Service

• Revising and improving standards through feedback—not always tragedy
• Positive evolution of the hazmat profession

18:12 – IC Role Updates

• New training hour requirements and specific ICS classes for Incident Commanders
• Appendix in NFPA 470 offers structured JPRs for IC roles

22:06 – The Importance of Training Records

• Ensuring consistent qualifications across multi-agency incidents
• Potential for transferable certifications between industrial and municipal teams

24:29 – Technology and Equipment Gaps

• How differing tools (like meters) create deficiencies between teams
• The case for standardized taskbooks and equipment training

27:22 – Final Thoughts

• Positive reception of NFPA 470 changes
• Hope for future improvements in documentation and database systems

28:34 – What’s Coming Next?

• Sneak peek into the next episode: comparing NFPA 470 with OSHA standards

28:55 – Listener Engagement

• Submit questions or episode ideas via [email protected]

Listener Engagement

Got questions, feedback, or ideas for future topics? Email the team at:

[email protected]

Don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and email us your thoughts! Tune in next week as we compare NFPA 470 with OSHA standards and dive into what’s coming next for industrial hazmat teams.

Episode Overview

In this thrilling conclusion to the three-part series on peroxide-forming chemicals, hosts Jeff, Steve, and Randy dive into several real-world case studies highlighting the dangers of mishandling these volatile substances. With a mix of expert analysis, storytelling, humor, and a bit of unexpected technical chaos, they underscore the importance of vigilance in industrial and laboratory safety. From explosive lab incidents to a near-IED discovery in an industrial lab, this episode offers critical lessons for hazmat professionals and industrial safety teams.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

[0:29] – Introduction and Recap

• Jeff introduces Part 3 of the peroxide series.

• Recap of Parts 1 & 2, covering peroxide formers, hazards, and detection.

[3:00] – Case Study #1: 2001 Evadale, Texas Paper Mill Explosion

• Explosion caused by hydrogen peroxide reacting with caustic soda.

• Resulted in extensive property damage and two injuries.

• Discussion of heat and oxygen generation in chemical reactions.

[10:15] – Case Study #2: 2006 UC Berkeley Lab Explosion

• An undergrad injured due to peroxide crystals formed during solvent distillation.

• Solvent (THF) was unstabilized; highlights importance of using inhibitors.

[20:00] – Internet & Audio Failures (Blooper Segment)

• Hosts experience hilarious technical difficulties and mic dropouts.

• Unfiltered banter and outtakes lighten the mood.

[27:40] – Case Study #3: 2017 University of Minnesota Waste Explosion

• Technician detonates residue while recycling a glass bottle.

• Explosion powerful enough to destroy a cart and damage adjacent rooms.

[34:45] – Case Study #4: 2012 Self-Reported TATP Formation

• Individual discovers TATP crystals in a decade-old IPA bottle.

• ATF confirms peroxide crystals can form over time with minimal conditions.

[44:10] – Follow-Up on Two Similar ATF Cases

• Explosions linked to old IPA containers in office and lab environments.

• Discussion on the forgotten dangers of long-term chemical storage.

[50:20] – Case Study #5: Personal On-Site Incident

• Discovery of crystallized THF in a neglected lab prompts evacuation.

• Team consults with external bomb expert for safe removal and disposal.

[1:00:00] – Wrap-Up & Teaser for Next Episode

• Tease of next episode’s topic: long-term sensitizing chemical exposure.

• Call to listeners to email stories and feedback.

Got a hazmat horror story or a weird chemical tale? Email the team at [email protected]

Episode Overview

In Part 2 of their deep dive into peroxide-forming chemicals (PFCs), the Industrial Strength team—Jeff, Steve, and Randy—shift focus from the chemistry to the practical. This episode explores visual inspections, safe handling, and field testing methods for detecting peroxide buildup in lab and industrial environments. The crew also sets the stage for an upcoming third part packed with explosive case studies.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

00:29 – 01:42 | Intro & Podcast History

Reintroducing the topic with the signature humor—and realizing this is actually their third multi-part episode.

01:42 – 04:44 | Visual Inspection Basics

Why brown bottles are used, and what peroxide crystal formations might look like—from cotton candy wisps to golf ball-sized ice-like solids.

04:44 – 06:30 | Where to Check for Solids

Learn about common formation areas: bottle bottoms, cap threads, and edges—especially after opening and evaporative exposure.

06:30 – 07:58 | THF Case Study Intro

Previewing a bottle of THF with visible white peroxide solids—described as an “improvised explosive device.”

07:59 – 13:45 | Examples of Crystals & Testing Limits

Detailed visual indicators and why peroxide levels over 80 ppm can be hazardous—even lower for Class A chemicals.

13:45 – 15:01 | Peroxide Testing Tools

Quick reviews of:

• KI paper (yes/no oxidizer test)
• Hydrogen peroxide test strips (for ppm levels)
• Key tips on test strip types and proper storage.

15:05 – 16:42 | Recent Real-World Inspection

Jeff recounts a recent facility event where six 2-year-old bottles of peroxide formers were safely inspected and tested with zero detections.

16:43 – 21:20 | What If Peroxides Are Present?

Neutralization methods: sodium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, iron(II) sulfate, and dilution tactics to lower concentration for safe handling.

21:23 – 23:39 | Storage, Use, and Neutralization Refresher

Class A peroxides and why they’re rarely seen outside labs. Importance of planning, risk assessment, and not relying on “Shaky Joe” for delicate tasks.

23:41 – 25:25 | Tease for Part 3

Upcoming episode will feature case studies where things went very wrong. Stay tuned for real incident breakdowns and lessons learned.

Key Moments & Quotes

• "Peroxide solids turn a bottle of solvent into an IED."
• "Check the cap threads—they dry out fast and that's where solids often start."
• "80 ppm is the rule of thumb, but even 20 ppm in Class A formers can be dangerous."
• "Shaky Joe does not handle the peroxide containers."

Episode Overview

In Part 1 of this two-part peroxide special, the Industrial Strength Podcast crew—Jeff, Randy, and Steve—unpack the explosive truth about peroxide-forming chemicals (PFCs). They break down what these substances are, the risks they pose in both lab and industrial environments, and how to identify and manage them safely. With real-life humor and technical depth, this episode is essential listening for hazmat professionals, lab managers, and safety geeks alike.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

00:33 – 01:34 | Offbeat Intro & Host Intros

Classic chaotic humor as Jeff fumbles through tech issues and introduces co-hosts Randy and Steve.

01:35 – 03:26 | What Are Peroxide-Forming Chemicals?

Overview of peroxide-formers—compounds that can form explosive peroxide crystals over time, like diethyl ether and THF.

03:27 – 04:57 | Peroxides Defined

Explaining the "OO" bond and why these chemicals are dangerously sensitive to heat, shock, and light.

04:59 – 06:49 | Four Key Factors for Peroxide Formation

Oxygen, time, heat/concentration, and light are all critical ingredients in this hazardous chemistry.

07:15 – 09:19 | Inhibitors Like BHT

The role of BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) in preventing peroxide buildup—and how it’s also used in food!

09:30 – 14:50 | Peroxide Classes A through D

Breaking down the four classes:

• Class A – Spontaneously form peroxides.
• Class B – Need external energy.
• Class C – React dangerously when peroxides are present.
• Class D – Possibly form peroxides, but not well understood.

14:51 – 16:26 | Proper Storage & Prevention Tips

Cool, dry, sealed storage and avoiding wood pallets for bulk containers.

16:26 – 21:01 | Visual Hazard Analysis

How to evaluate suspicious containers and what visual clues to look for—like crust formation or pressurized distortion.

21:02 – 24:52 | How Hazmat Teams Should Handle Suspect Containers

Detailed guidance on how and when to safely transport, inspect, or dispose of potentially dangerous materials.

24:53 – 27:11 | Storage Time Limits by Class

• Class A: 3 months
• Class B/D: 12 months
• Class C (inhibited): 12 months
• Class C (uninhibited): 24 hours (yes, hours!)

27:12 – 30:14 | Wrap-Up and Tease for Part 2

Previewing Part 2, which will feature testing methods, visuals of peroxide solids, and real-world case studies.

Key Moments & Quotes

• "It contains all the materials to do it themselves. Class A is the most dangerous."
• "Don’t move the container until a full hazard assessment is done. Period."
• "Slow and observant wins the race—no Leroy Jenkins allowed on peroxide calls."
• "That UV light... it's magic."

Episode Overview

In this enlightening and engaging episode, hosts Jeff, Steve, and Randy dive deep into the hazardous world of bromine—a volatile, reddish-brown chemical with significant industrial use and serious safety concerns. From bromine’s chemical properties to real-world incidents involving its release, this episode is both a technical resource and a candid behind-the-scenes look at the realities of industrial hazmat response.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps

00:32 – 01:18 | Introduction & Host Intros

Meet your hosts: Jeff (20-year fire service vet), Steve (industrial response expert), and Randy (17-year hazmat specialist).

01:20 – 02:19 | What Is Bromine?

Learn what makes bromine unique—its appearance, volatility, and uses.

02:19 – 03:42 | Industrial Applications & Chemical Interactions

Discussion on bromine’s diverse uses, especially in water treatment and mercury emissions control.

03:43 – 05:05 | Health Hazards & Exposure Limits

Covering fatal exposure risks, IDLH comparisons with chlorine, and regulatory exposure limits.

05:36 – 08:34 | Personal Anecdotes & Work Conditions

Humorous banter on EHS, exposure monitoring, and real-world work shifts.

09:59 – 11:48 | Bromine Reactions with Water

Exploring bromine's reactive byproducts, such as HOBr and HBr, and their uses in disinfection.

12:09 – 13:15 | Neutralization Techniques

Using sodium bisulfite and how bromine behaves when neutralized.

13:27 – 14:55 | Equipment Compatibility & Video Demo

Video of bromine reacting with aluminum—visually striking and informative.

15:13 – 20:07 | Real-Life Bromine Incidents

Detailed recounting of significant bromine leaks in Russia (2011) and Conyers, Georgia (2024).

20:08 – 24:26 | Site Handling Practices & Monitors

Insight into on-site bromine management, container types, and monitoring tools like the Draeger 7000.

24:26 – 30:00 | PPE and Environmental Modifications

Adjusting PPE levels and using fans and water sprays to alter the work environment safely.

30:04 – 32:24 | Leak Incident Response

Step-by-step breakdown of a bromine leak mitigation—detectors, dry-links, pig pads, and gaskets.

32:25 – 33:17 | Wrapping Up & Next Episode Tease

Contact info, shoutouts, and a preview of next episode’s topic: peroxide dangers.

Key Moments & Quotes

• "We're going to talk about that code red... and not Mountain Dew."
• "Bromine is still very, very hazardous—fatal if inhaled, swallowed, or absorbed through skin."
• "We changed the environment to avoid Level A PPE in the summer—fans and water sprays made all the difference."
• "Only a few drops of bromine can set off multiple area alarms."

Episode Overview:

In this special deep-dive episode, Jeff, Randy, and Steve analyze two of the most catastrophic rail car incidents in recent history: the Lac-Mégantic crude oil derailment in Quebec and the East Palestine, Ohio vinyl chloride disaster. The crew explores what went wrong, what lessons apply to industrial emergency response teams, and how these events highlight the critical need for proactive safety planning, cross-agency collaboration, and realistic training for large-scale hazmat emergencies.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps:

00:00 – Introductions & Episode Setup

• Continuing the rail car discussion from last week by zooming in on real-world case studies.

04:30 – Incident 1: Lac-Mégantic, Quebec (2013)

• Crude oil derailment destroyed the downtown area, killing 47 people.
• Key issues: deferred maintenance, outdated DOT-111 tank cars, inadequate braking.

11:25 – Technical Breakdown of the Lac-Mégantic Failure

• Engine fire led to loss of air braking system.
• Insufficient handbrakes set; train rolled into town and exploded.

17:15 – Incident 2: East Palestine, Ohio (2023)

• Vinyl chloride spill led to a controversial emergency flare-off.
• No deaths but major environmental and health concerns.

22:45 – Root Causes of East Palestine

• Defective wheel bearing and conventional braking systems.
• Regulatory loopholes allowed transport of dangerous materials under less scrutiny.

29:30 – Emergency Response & Preparedness Gaps

• Both incidents exposed the unpreparedness of local responders.
• Emphasis on regional response collaboration and limitations of local fire departments.

36:40 – The Decision to Flare Vinyl Chloride

• Analysis of the controversial flare-off: pros, cons, and long-term fallout.
• Discussion on the chemical risks: phosgene production, explosive risk, environmental toll.

45:20 – Environmental Impact & Community Trust

• Water, soil, and air contamination.
• Long-term health concerns and psychological toll on residents.

51:00 – Takeaways for Industrial Hazmat Teams

• Importance of site-specific training, mutual aid partnerships, and gear readiness.
• Real-world gear examples: railcar training, chlorine C-kits, plug-and-patch systems.

58:05 – Industrial Collaboration & Moving Forward

• Encouraging more cooperation among industrial teams, not just municipalities.
• Proactive planning, cross-agency drills, and embracing new technology.

01:04:20 – Broader Lessons and Final Thoughts

• Don’t rely on being reactive—push for prevention and policy changes.
• Importance of community communication and regulatory updates.

01:09:00 – Listener Call-to-Action & Tease for Next Episode

• Email: [email protected]
• Next up: “Code Red” – hinting at a serious and high-priority chemical.

Have thoughts or similar stories? Email [email protected] or comment on their YouTube channel.

Next episode teaser: “Code Red” – what does it mean when things go from routine to critical in seconds?

Episode Overview:

In this episode, Jeff, Randy, and Steve tackle a listener-requested topic: hazardous materials transported by rail and how to handle rail car incidents on industrial sites. Sharing real-world experiences, near-miss stories, and detailed response strategies, they explore the complexities of managing rail cars carrying flammable, toxic, corrosive, and even radioactive substances. With their signature mix of humor and technical expertise, they also preview a future deep-dive on the infamous East Palestine incident.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps:

00:00 – Introductions & Topic Setup

• Hosts reintroduce themselves and introduce the episode’s theme: rail car incidents.

02:45 – Common Hazmat in Rail Transport

• Flammable liquids (e.g., crude oil, ethanol), toxic gases (e.g., chlorine, ammonia), corrosives, explosives, and radioactive materials.

06:12 – Site-Specific Rail Car Challenges

• Unique dynamics of industrial endpoint users.
• Managing large inventories (e.g., up to 150 cars on site).

10:28 – Risks of Rail Car Operations

• Mechanical failures (e.g., bearings, brakes).
• Human error, poor weather conditions, outdated tank cars (DOT-111).

16:10 – Safety Measures & Industry Collaboration

• Upgraded cars (DOT-117), monitoring systems for hot bearings.
• CN Railroad’s free onsite training praised as a model for preparedness.

22:40 – Response Protocols for Rail Incidents

• Evacuations, shelter-in-place, cordoning off zones.
• Using ERG guides and placards to identify contents and hazards.

28:15 – Mitigation & Containment Tactics

• Plug-and-patch methods, chlorine C-kits, environmental protection.
• Transfer complexities and scale of response for large volumes.

34:40 – Realistic Cleanup Timelines

• Hours to years depending on severity, chemical type, and location.
• Discussion of regulatory restrictions, leak containment, and off-site transport bans.

40:00 – Case Examples & Notable Incidents

• Canada’s 2013 Lac-Mégantic disaster.
• East Palestine, OH (2023): preview of a future deep-dive episode.

45:50 – Importance of Preplanning and Equipment

• Value of readiness: PPE, containment tools, patch kits, drones.
• Site-specific examples like rail line derailments and valve leaks.

50:32 – Wrap-Up & Listener Call-to-Action

• Call for rail-related experiences, gear tips, and training practices.

53:00 – Teaser for Next Episode

• Next episode topic: Bromine — a dense, hazardous chemical in use on site.

Do you handle rail cars at your site? Had a near miss or a notable incident? Share your story at [email protected] — and help shape future episodes.

Stay tuned for next week's discussion on bromine, a heavy, volatile chemical that poses unique challenges in both handling and response.

Episode Overview:

In this insightful episode, hosts Jeff, Randy, and Steve dive deep into the challenges and intricacies of handling mercury spills in industrial settings. Drawing from real-life case studies within their facility, they discuss response protocols, lessons learned, and best practices for dealing with hazardous elemental mercury. With their characteristic humor and camaraderie, they bring both technical depth and relatable storytelling to this critical HAZMAT topic.

Segment Breakdown & Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

• Meet your hosts: Jeff, Randy, and Steve — seasoned industrial HAZMAT professionals.
• Overview of the episode’s focus: Mercury-related emergency responses.

03:15 – Real Case #1: P-Trap Pipe Spill

• Mercury release during maintenance work.
• How it was unknowingly spread across the facility.

07:32 – Real Case #2: Lab Assay Spill

• Mercury-laden solution spills on a worker.
• Cross-contamination due to unawareness and movement.

11:40 – Elemental Mercury: Why It’s a Big Deal

• History and reduction of mercury use.
• Modern-day uses and dangers of exposure.

17:00 – Health Effects of Mercury Exposure

• Acute and long-term symptoms.
• Why small spills are still high-risk.

21:40 – First Response: PPE and Metering Needs

• The critical role of proper PPE (Level B with SCBA).
• Challenges of mercury detection and the limitations of current gear.

28:10 – Budget Constraints & Third-Party Support

• Why industrial teams often outsource mercury testing.
• Differences in municipal vs. corporate HAZMAT funding.

32:45 – Cleanup Techniques and Tools

• Step-by-step breakdown of spill kit usage.
• Mercury detection, containment tools, and limitations of vacuuming.

39:05 – Secondary Remediation Measures

• Using activated carbon and heat to remove residual mercury.
• Clearance standards and regulatory oversight.

44:12 – Lessons Learned & Preventive Measures

• Importance of awareness, education, and proper containment.
• Impact of missteps on time, cost, and safety.

48:00 – Listener Engagement

• Call for shared stories and feedback from other HAZMAT professionals.

49:12 – Teaser for Next Episode

• Upcoming topic: Rail car issues — another listener-suggested topic.

Have you dealt with a mercury call at your site? Send your stories to [email protected].

Don't miss the next episode on rail car hazards — especially relevant if you work with bulk transport or industrial shipping.

Episode Overview

This episode of Industrial Strength Podcast takes a deep dive into a high-intensity unannounced emergency response drill that left responders and employees rattled. What started as a routine man down call escalated into a full-blown multiple casualty incident—except it was all part of a secret drill.

The team breaks down the response, the decisions made, and the emotional aftermath. They also discuss the value and controversy of unannounced drills, whether they are the best way to train emergency responders, and the importance of stress inoculation in high-stakes situations.

Key Topics Covered

• The emergency call: A “man down” incident in a packout room of a chemical synthesis building
• Initial confusion: Lack of details from dispatch and conflicting information on-scene
• The hazards considered: Nitrogen asphyxiation, chemical exposure, or medical emergency?
• How the ERT (Emergency Response Team) assessed the scene before making entry
• The importance of oxygen and LEL monitoring in enclosed spaces
• How nitrogen asphyxiation works and the rapid onset of unconsciousness
• Real-life case study: A 2021 nitrogen leak that killed 14 workers at a Georgia meatpacking plant
• The response actions taken: Ventilating the packout room, controlled entry, and victim extraction
• The moment the drill was revealed and the backlash from responders and employees
• The psychological impact: When a drill feels real, does it go too far?
• The debate: Are unannounced drills effective, or do they create unnecessary panic?

Notable Moments and Key Takeaways

• Nitrogen asphyxiation can be undetectable and fatal within seconds
• ERT responders avoided a dangerous blind entry by using atmospheric testing and controlled ventilation
• Unannounced drills can expose weaknesses but may also create resentment and emotional fallout
• Stress inoculation through realistic training can prepare teams for real emergencies
• Industrial emergency responders often face additional emotional challenges due to familiarity with coworkers

Resources & References

• OSHA and NFPA guidelines on confined space entry and nitrogen safety
• Case studies on industrial nitrogen leaks and fatalities
• Best practices for conducting safe and effective emergency response drills

Listener Engagement

Have you ever been part of an unannounced emergency drill? Did it help your team prepare, or did it cause unnecessary tension? Share your experiences and insights with us at [email protected].

Next Episode Preview

The team teases an episode with the theme "Heavy Metal"—but what does that really mean? Are they talking about hazardous materials or throwing in some Slayer and Metallica references? Tune in next time to find out.