The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case’s dismissal.



(commercial at 10:13)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.