
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The paper proposes a method called JudgeLM to evaluate large language models (LLMs) in open-ended scenarios. They fine-tune LLMs as scalable judges and introduce techniques to address biases. JudgeLM achieves state-of-the-art performance and high agreement with human judges.
https://arxiv.org/abs//2310.17631
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers
By Igor Melnyk5
33 ratings
The paper proposes a method called JudgeLM to evaluate large language models (LLMs) in open-ended scenarios. They fine-tune LLMs as scalable judges and introduce techniques to address biases. JudgeLM achieves state-of-the-art performance and high agreement with human judges.
https://arxiv.org/abs//2310.17631
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers

962 Listeners

1,986 Listeners

436 Listeners

112,842 Listeners

10,104 Listeners

5,539 Listeners

216 Listeners

51 Listeners

99 Listeners

475 Listeners