Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the status of the high profile federal lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University, focusing on a key court-ordered deadline coming up on July 27, 2026. This federal proceeding is being prosecuted by the families of the four student catastrophically lost on November 13, 2022 at 1122 King Road.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. One year since the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.

A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation regarding the status of matters in the public records lawsuit leading up to a hearing on August 5, 2026.

A hearing is scheduled in May on EWU's petition. Here we discuss an amended order entered by Judge Megan E. Marshall concerning the case. This is a current status of the case. 

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

#EWUMedia

#1122KingRoad

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and ask the rhetorical question: Does recent public records request share on YT by Connor establish that Det. Brett Payne, lead detective in the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road and Mr. Kohberger and thus the State of Idaho was aware of Brent L.K., a topic which has been hotly debated and discussed in the community.

LINK: To YT Channel Community Page with Receipts RE: Final Days of the case: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ... here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#BrentLK

#IdahovKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which remains almost as highly sealed as it was when the case was in active pre-trial, a case that was closed one year ago on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was sentenced. Are answers found in the documents filed in the final days of the case that induced Mr. Kohberger to change his plea from not guilty to guilty as he did on July 2, 2025, which came as a surprise to many in the public. LINK: To YT Channel Community Page with Receipts RE: Final Days of the case: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we discuss for educational purposes and based on pure opinions, commentary and speculations as to the federal civil rights lawsuit filed by Alex Murdaugh against Rebecca "Becky" Hill former Clerk of Court after two convictions for the unalivings of his wife and son were thrown out by the South Carolina Supreme Court due to actions attributed to Ms. Hill.

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. This matter resulted in a $10 million verdict in favor of Plaintiff Scofield, which Defendant Guillard has appealed to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.

Link to our past content on this lawsuit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di9KPGcFJiw

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and ask rhetorical questions in the form of an update into an Idaho Department of Investigations Official Investigation concerning possible "leaked" video of Mr. Kohberger purportedly inside the maximum security prison where he was sentenced to begin serving out his life term outside of Boise effective July 23, 2025.

Link to 2025 Update RE this matter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoNY9-28uzk

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation regarding defense expert Sy Ray's statements in a recent interview that Mr. Kohberger might be considering a potential appeal of his conviction; and the compelling use of the term "miscarriage of justice" while doing so, a possible reference to the June 2026 Supreme Court landmark ruling of Hunter v US where waiver of appellate rights may be overcome. The crucial deadline for Mr. Kohberger to file a Petition for Post Conviction Relief is rapidly approaching, causing us to ask the rhetorical question of will he or won't Mr. Kohberger file?

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man. Ms. Owens Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit or strike parts of the Amended Complaint we note the First Amendment as the very first reason for granting Ms. Owens the relief she seeks. This motion has been set for hearing three times, with the third hearing currently set for late July 2026. We ask the rhetorical question: Will the lawsuit survive the motion or will it be dismissed?

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the matter styled as Richard M. Allen v. State of Indiana also known as the "Delphi Appeal" and relate information on how the public may watch the forthcoming appellate oral argument where Mr. Allen is seeking reversal of his convictions or in the alternative of an order granting a "Franks" hearing.

Link to our YT channel as discussed herein:    

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxL3IZ6WlcD8fdJmip8HDegg4zw1xoEHjv

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AbbyandLibby

#AllenvIndiana

#DelphiAppeal

#FreeSpeech