Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here, per the First Amendment we provide pure opinions, speculations, comments and discuss inquiries/commentary in the public regarding why the defense is seeking to change venue, when the trial date will be set, when is the deadline for defense to possibly bring in 3rd parties (persons/entities addressed in the First Affirmative Defense) and more regarding the high profile federal lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #WashingtonStateUniversity #BryanKohberger #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech

Here, we provide an update on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case concerning Mr. Reiner's Feb. 23, 2026 arraignment proceeding. He has been charged with two counts of unalivings in the first degree with special circumstances concerning the tragic Dec. 14, 2025 unalivings of his parents, famed Hollywood director/actor Rob Reiner and photographer/producer Michelle Reiner.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

#RobReiner

#MicheleReiner

#NickReiner

#TrueCrime

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. A new docket entry of February 19, 2026 provides a change of location for the final pretrial conference (Feb. 23) and the four-day jury trial (commencing Feb. 24) at the Boise federal courthouse.

LINK to our prior podcast on Federal Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction in the Idaho4 Defamation Case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NcoGyUvx-c&t=107s

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Defamation

#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. A new Plaintiff filing on February 18, 2026 has resulted in the court setting a schedule for a response and a reply thereto on "the courthouse steps" just before the federal jury trial set to commence on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. Will this matter settle at pretrial conference, is a rhetorical question asked herein.

LINK to our prior podcast on Federal Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction in the Idaho4 Defamation Case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NcoGyUvx-c&t=107s

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Defamation

#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the matter styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University addressing the rhetorical question of third party practice given the language of defense's First Affirmative Defense referencing possibly third party persons or entities who might be liable to Plaintiffs.

.⁠Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4

#WashingtonStateUniversity

#FederalCourt

#FederalRulesofCivilProcedure

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the matter styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University and what is coming due on the docket leading up to the February 27, 2026 hearing before Judge Evanson. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 is the Local Rule of Court relevant to motions and schedules for the deadlines for the briefings regarding the defense Motion to Change to Venue (Doc. No. 8). LINK to Court's website regarding Pilot Program discussed in this episode: https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/attorne...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4

#WashingtonStateUniversity

#FederalCourt

Link to the Local Rules of Court Discussed in this Podcast Episode: https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/sites/wawd/files/WAWD%20Local%20Civil%20Rules%20%282026%29%20-%20Clean.pdf

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. The federal court has issued orders denying defense's Motions to Dismiss and to Continue the Trial. Jury Trial is set to commence on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026.

LINK to our prior podcast on Federal Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction in the Idaho4 Defamation Case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NcoGyUvx-c&t=107s

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Defamation

#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation in accordance with the First Amendment United States Constitution concerning unknown final resolution of events occurring ninth, sixth and two months ago, respectively as to the high-profile closed case of Idaho v. Kohberger. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the matter styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University as to the first hearing set in the case, what it is for, and whether it will be broadcast to the public.

LINK to Court's website regarding Pilot Program discussed in this episode: https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/attorneys/cameras-in-the-courtroom

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #WashingtonStateUniversity #BryanKohberger #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation concerning the federal court's pending rulings on the Defense's Motion to Continue the Feb. 24 Trial and Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit Based on Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

LINK to our prior podcast on Federal Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction in the Idaho4 Defamation Case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NcoGyUvx-c&t=107s

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Defamation

#BryanKohberger