Kathy's InDieZoNe

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger pled guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. A year after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road.

The Respondents filed a request to dismiss the lawsuit, which Judge Marshall has denied. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#EWUMedia

#KohbergerFiles

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie on February 2, 2026 from her home in Tucson, Arizona and discuss two other past cases and the significance of the "see something/say something" protocol.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#NancyGuthrie

#SavannahGuthrie

#SeeSomethingSaySomething

#KathysIndieZone

Here as our nation is about to celebrate its 250th year, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning a quote one of the SCOTUS justices provided raising concerns about plea deals replacing jury trials and how it might have caused concerns to the framers of the U.S. Constitution in the matter styled as Hunter vs. United States (addressing appellate waivers).Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.

#Idaho4

#HuntervUS

#IdahovKohberger

#SCOTUS

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning discussions that Mr. Kohberger filed a petition for post-conviction relief in the lawsuit concerning the Idaho Statesman's efforts to obtain under-seal documentation relative to the costs of the criminal case styled as Idaho v. Kohberger.

LINK to our YT Channel Community Page: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxxYQrpxovZbLMaBjUnLpog80otQQfj8OI

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#PostConvictionRelief

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard which resulted in a $10 million judgment in Plaintiff's favor following a jury trial. The defense filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal with her Initial Brief on the Merits due June 29, 2026. It was not however filed that day and here we explain why. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning Goncalves et al v. Washington State University and the first deadline per the June 1, 2026 federal court's order regarding joinder of third parties. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

ere we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning a 6-3 United States Supreme Court ruling on June 29, 2026 in Chatrie v. US finding that the use of "geofence warrants" was a search as contemplated by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requiring a warrant (with few exceptions).

LINK to our community page discussed here: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.

#ChatrievUS

#FourthAmendment

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the seven (7) separate categories of reasons for post-conviction relief under the Idaho statute. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#HuntervUS

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the 2025 civil defamation case styled as Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron v. Candace Owens et al., where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Ms. Owens alleging she defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man and both Mr. and Mrs. Macron in alleging they both committed fraud regarding the same. Here we provide an up-to-the minute status on the hearing on the defense motion to dismiss which has been reset three times. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#PresidentMacron

#FirstLadyMacron

#BrigitteMacron

#CandaceOwens

#Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the type of filing a Petitioner in Idaho seeking to file a post-conviction relief action challenging their sentence/conviction

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright