Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system

Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

There are still four years to go until the next general election, but for anyone attending Labour's conference in Liverpool it has often felt like Nigel Farage is already comfortably in Number 10.

At fringe events and on the conference stage Cabinet Ministers have spoken endlessly of the Reform leader and his four Members of Parliament, while the thoughts and wishes of Labour's 400 elected MPs have firmly taken a back seat.

In her first conference speech Labour's new Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood declared that she would have to get "tough" on migrants in order to fend off Reform, telling Labour party members that they "may not like" what she had to do.

So just days after the Prime Minister declared that Farage's mass deportation plans were "racist" and "immoral", Mahmood instead unveiled her own toned-down version of those plans, in which migrants will now be forced to wait ten years and conduct compulsory "voluntary" work, in order to avoid also being expelled from the country.

Unveiling what was billed in the press as a "major crackdown on migration" Mahmood announced that migrants would also be barred from claiming any benefits whatsoever if they wanted to ever be given leave to remain in the country.

The only way to beat the racists in Reform, we seemed to be told, was to give them almost everything they wanted.

And yet while the threat of Reform was repeatedly raised on stage, the Prime Minister himself appeared to reserve an almost greater level of disdain for what he described as the "extreme" left, who he labelled "snake oil merchants" who hated their country.

Speaking on Sky News, the Prime Minister's right hand man in Downing Street, Darren Jones, warned that "the progressive movement outside of the Labour Party" must understand that "populism on the left… risks taking us down a much darker path for our country".

When Downing Street briefed the press last week that he would launch a "progressive fightback" it wasn't clear that what he really wanted to do was to launch a fightback against progressives.

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR

PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH

MORE OPTIONS

We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.

An Alternative Path

Not everyone appeared to agree with this strategy. Across the conference fringes Labour's Mayor of Manchester Andy Burnham beguiled Labour members with the suggestion that, just perhaps, the Government could be doing a few things that they, rather than Nigel Farage, wanted them to do. Perhaps it would be possible for a Labour Government with a huge landslide majority and several more years to play with, to actually cut living costs, change the electoral system and move back towards the EU.

Such "snake oil" was not warmly received, however, with Cabinet Ministers and Downing Street aides pouring bile into journalists' ears about Burnham's preposterous suggestion that a Labour Government could actually do some things that Labour MPs, members and voters wanted.

In his speech, the Prime Minister strongly resisted such calls for what he described as "unfunded tax cuts or unfunded spending" saying that the "fiscal rules" holding them back from doing the sorts of things Burnham and others were calling for were "non-negotiable".

Instead Starmer offered vague promises to "rewire the economy" in order to give voters "agency over the state" at some indeterminate point in the future. Unlike back in the Blair era, when ministers used conference speeches to announce and promote popular new schemes and policies, there was n...