Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
View all episodes
By Will Baude, Dan Epps
4.8
739739 ratings
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
More shows like Divided Argument
View all
Bloomberg Law
380 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
675 Listeners
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
708 Listeners
GLoP Culture
1,845 Listeners
We the People
1,114 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,300 Listeners
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
6,615 Listeners
Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
7,291 Listeners
Strict Scrutiny
5,865 Listeners
Advisory Opinions
3,951 Listeners
The Dispatch Podcast
3,354 Listeners
Amarica's Constitution
395 Listeners
Central Air
457 Listeners
Serious Trouble
433 Listeners
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
37 Listeners