
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
4.8
660660 ratings
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
1,089 Listeners
362 Listeners
6,264 Listeners
2,387 Listeners
667 Listeners
19,747 Listeners
4,811 Listeners
152 Listeners
4,754 Listeners
6,361 Listeners
5,458 Listeners
3,729 Listeners
3,155 Listeners
362 Listeners
90 Listeners