Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
View all episodes
By Will Baude, Dan Epps
4.8
732732 ratings
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
More shows like Divided Argument
View all
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
3,534 Listeners
Bloomberg Law
377 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
682 Listeners
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
685 Listeners
We the People
1,113 Listeners
The Reason Roundtable
1,514 Listeners
The Commentary Magazine Podcast
5,181 Listeners
The Editors
4,876 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,303 Listeners
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
6,590 Listeners
Strict Scrutiny
5,780 Listeners
Advisory Opinions
3,893 Listeners
The Dispatch Podcast
3,329 Listeners
Amarica's Constitution
380 Listeners
Serious Trouble
429 Listeners