Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
View all episodes
By Will Baude, Dan Epps
4.8
739739 ratings
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
More shows like Divided Argument
View all
Bloomberg Law
385 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
673 Listeners
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
703 Listeners
GLoP Culture
1,846 Listeners
We the People
1,109 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,319 Listeners
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
6,616 Listeners
Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
7,228 Listeners
Strict Scrutiny
5,820 Listeners
Advisory Opinions
3,919 Listeners
The Dispatch Podcast
3,355 Listeners
Amarica's Constitution
401 Listeners
Central Air
338 Listeners
Serious Trouble
432 Listeners
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
40 Listeners