Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Libertarian Legal Morality Tales
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
View all episodes
By Will Baude, Dan Epps
4.8
739739 ratings
As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.
More shows like Divided Argument
View all
Bloomberg Law
377 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
674 Listeners
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
703 Listeners
GLoP Culture
1,828 Listeners
We the People
1,113 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,289 Listeners
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg
6,593 Listeners
Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
7,232 Listeners
Strict Scrutiny
5,799 Listeners
Advisory Opinions
3,901 Listeners
The Dispatch Podcast
3,336 Listeners
Amarica's Constitution
399 Listeners
Central Air
335 Listeners
Serious Trouble
430 Listeners
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
36 Listeners