I just finished running for the position of Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction.  I was one of six candidates for the Superintendent’s position, one of whom was the incumbent, who manages the state’s schools using a top-down management philosophy.  The incumbent qualified for the general election, as did Maia Espinoza.  Maia Espinoza attended a conference given by the Transatlantic Inclusion Leaders Network, a globalist organization that promotes gender inclusion, homosexuality, rights of migrants (illegals), and international Muslim advancement, which alerted her to the threats facing our society. 

This exposure to the radical agenda, plus the recently approved sex ed curriculum that is little more than sexual promiscuity promotion, inspired Maia Espinoza to run for Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction.  Maia Espinoza plans to change the current incumbents’ top-down style of management to allow far more autonomy for the local school districts, which is consistent with our federalist system of government that gives local governmental bodies authority over most issues.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

In this program, I will analyze the contents of an email message that I received while a candidate for Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction.  This individual challenged me because I: was pro-family, was pro-Second Amendment, was pro-Property Rights, was against leftist propaganda, distributed copies of the US Constitution to students who asked me for a copy, wanted the schools to graduate productive citizens, wanted to promote religious liberty, stood against sexual anarchy, and promoted “common sense.” 

This individual is obviously indoctrinated far beyond his intelligence.  He is indicative of the treasonous ignoramuses that our schools mass produce with our tax money.  When people such as this gain power, our civil and religious liberties will be only dim memories.  Abraham Lincoln said: “The philosophy of the classroom in one generation is the philosophy of the government in the next.”  I will address each issue and defend my position in this program as time permits. 

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

If an individual received a recommendation from a doctor that extreme surgery, such as a heart transplant or amputation, was needed, that individual would most certainly want to get a second opinion before allowing any extreme medical procedure.  Unfortunately, the powers-that-shouldn’t-be has a functionary as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases named Dr. Anthony Fauci whose fear mongering caused the economy and society to come to a virtual standstill, resulting in disruption to the lives of millions and untold suffering and death. 

There are many reputable doctors and scientists who have been providing second opinions, but the powers that shouldn’t be have seen fit to ensure that they get no publicity.  I will try to partially compensate for the failure of the mainstream media to disseminate responsible opposing views by covering some of them on this program.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

On this program, I discuss the blatant anti-Christian sectarian bigotry and anti-First-Amendment views and policies being promoted imposed by the cultural elite and some government officials. 

The title of the program comes from Matthew 16:18, in which Jesus says to Peter "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."  The contemporary anti-Christian sectarian bigotry is a threat to both our religious and our civil liberty.  Bill Gates, though not mentioned in the program, is also an egregious example of this sectarian bigotry and thus acts as "one of the Gates of Hell." 

This program discusses other "gates," such as Hillary Clinton, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, and Hollyweido Bill Maher.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

On this program, we unmask the mask propaganda that is causing mask hysteria.

First, we will review the advice from the white lab coats that mask use is necessary to stop the transmission of the coronavirus, and then we will compare what scientific studies reveal, as documented in the article: "The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses" by Dr. Denis G Rancourt, PhD, researchgate.net, April 20, 2020. Masks and respirators don't work. All studies show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle.  Government-mandated mask use illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

In this program, I discuss how government officials, including elected and appointed officials, are violating their oaths of office and suppressing the God-given, constitutionally protected civil and religious liberty of the citizenry.  In order to accomplish this tyranny, these officials are hiding the “man in the white lab coat,” the presumed fount of all wisdom, who in fact is a lying tyrant himself. 

What do you call a highly educated individual who wears the clothing of researcher and deliberately speaks falsehoods?  You call that individual a liar.  Refer to John 8:44.  Specifically, the program addresses the lies of "scientists" who recommend that the economy remain locked down and people continue wearing masks for years to come, when actual scientific research shows that wearing masks to prevent the spread of viruses is not only ineffective but actually harmful.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

I discuss the liberals' use of "Newspeak" to change the meaning of words and use these new meanings to slander their opponents. I use several examples, such as "Black Lives Matter," which should more accurately be named "Bombastic Lying Marxists."

I discuss the corruption of the words Nazi, Fascist, White Supremacist, and racist, and show how Charles Darwin was an unapologetic white supremacist. I also give the definition of Newspeak, a term that came from the book 1984, a dystopian novel by George Orwell. Newspeak was created by the totalitarian overlords of Oceania, with its fictional leader known as Big Brother, in order to actually limit free thought and free speech. In totalitarian governments, those in charge try to control every aspect of citizens' lives, even down to personal habits, by changing the meaning of words.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

In this program, I discuss how evil, deceitful people can advance a sinister narrative by using fraudulent terms to frame the debate and thus advance a vile agenda.  Specifically, I am going to discuss the grossly misnamed organization “Black Lives Matter,” which, if the truth-in-labeling law applied to organizations, would be called “No Lives Matter,” and the terrifying agenda these no-lives-matter types have in store for our citizenry, especially our youth. 

Other names that would be more description of the BLM crowd are “Black Genocide,” “Balkanize America so that various groups fight against each other and hasten America’s destruction,” and “Bible Mocking Matters.”  I will justify my views based on the BLM statements from their website and compare their policies with the Holy Bible.  In the program, I read from the BLM website and insert my comments.  

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

I discuss how evil, deceitful people can use fraudulent terms to frame the debate and thus advance a vile agenda.  Specifically, I am going to discuss the grossly misnamed organization “Black Lives Matter,” which, if the truth-in-labeling law applied to organizations, would be called “No Lives Matter,” and the terrifying agenda these no-lives-matter types have in store for our citizenry, especially our youth.

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity

The program discusses the possible globalist rationale for the comprehensive sex ed curriculum promoted by Planned Parenthood and will discuss the actions of some high-profile clergy who have abandoned Biblical standards in order to keep in the good graces of the Bible-mocking hate-America-firsters.

If the truth-in-labeling law applied to curricula and organizations, the comprehensive sex ed curriculum promoted by Planned Parenthood would be called the “promiscuity for all children in every subject in every grade” promoted by “Planned Promiscuity.”

© Copyright 2020 Liberty and Posterity