
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This comprehensive mega episode covers all seven blockbuster Supreme Court cases scheduled for December 2025 oral arguments. From presidential power over independent agencies to billion-dollar copyright battles, these cases could reshape American governance, individual rights, and economic regulation for generations. The episode provides high-level analysis of each case's constitutional stakes and practical implications.
Episode RoadmapBillion-Dollar Broadband Battle: Cox v. Sony involves a $1 billion verdict asking whether ISPs face copyright catastrophe when users infringe, potentially transforming how internet service providers police their networks and affecting every American's internet access.
First Choice v. Platkin tests when state subpoenas silence speech - whether nonprofits can bypass state courts for immediate federal protection of First Amendment rights, affecting advocacy groups nationwide.
Olivier v. City of Brandon tackles the prospective relief puzzle - whether past convictions create permanent immunity shields for potentially unconstitutional laws challenging future enforcement.
Trump v. Slaughter examines Trump's total takedown of independent agencies - whether the President can remove commissioners without cause, potentially eliminating the structure protecting $47 trillion in economic activity.
NRSC v. FEC features the First Amendment fight over party coordination, with the extraordinary situation where the Federal Election Commission sides with challengers against its own regulations.
IQ Score Showdown and Fund Feud: Hamm v. Smith determines when multiple tests determine life or death in capital cases, while FS Credit v. Saba examines forcing fiduciary fairness through federal lawsuits in investment disputes.
FS Credit v. Saba examines forcing fiduciary fairness through federal lawsuits, asking whether shareholders have implied private rights to sue under the Investment Company Act when the SEC doesn't act.
TIMESTAMPS
[00:00:00] Mailbag
[00:23:59] December Case Previews
[00:24:55] Cox Communications versus Sony Music Entertainment
[00:26:17] First Choice Women's Resource Centers versus Platkin
[00:27:38] Olivier versus City of Brandon
[00:29:04] Trump versus Slaughter
[00:30:31] National Republican Senatorial Committee versus Federal Election Commission
[00:32:04] Hamm versus Smith
[00:33:12] FS Credit versus Saba
[00:33:52] Final Thoughts and Conclusion
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.6
99 ratings
This comprehensive mega episode covers all seven blockbuster Supreme Court cases scheduled for December 2025 oral arguments. From presidential power over independent agencies to billion-dollar copyright battles, these cases could reshape American governance, individual rights, and economic regulation for generations. The episode provides high-level analysis of each case's constitutional stakes and practical implications.
Episode RoadmapBillion-Dollar Broadband Battle: Cox v. Sony involves a $1 billion verdict asking whether ISPs face copyright catastrophe when users infringe, potentially transforming how internet service providers police their networks and affecting every American's internet access.
First Choice v. Platkin tests when state subpoenas silence speech - whether nonprofits can bypass state courts for immediate federal protection of First Amendment rights, affecting advocacy groups nationwide.
Olivier v. City of Brandon tackles the prospective relief puzzle - whether past convictions create permanent immunity shields for potentially unconstitutional laws challenging future enforcement.
Trump v. Slaughter examines Trump's total takedown of independent agencies - whether the President can remove commissioners without cause, potentially eliminating the structure protecting $47 trillion in economic activity.
NRSC v. FEC features the First Amendment fight over party coordination, with the extraordinary situation where the Federal Election Commission sides with challengers against its own regulations.
IQ Score Showdown and Fund Feud: Hamm v. Smith determines when multiple tests determine life or death in capital cases, while FS Credit v. Saba examines forcing fiduciary fairness through federal lawsuits in investment disputes.
FS Credit v. Saba examines forcing fiduciary fairness through federal lawsuits, asking whether shareholders have implied private rights to sue under the Investment Company Act when the SEC doesn't act.
TIMESTAMPS
[00:00:00] Mailbag
[00:23:59] December Case Previews
[00:24:55] Cox Communications versus Sony Music Entertainment
[00:26:17] First Choice Women's Resource Centers versus Platkin
[00:27:38] Olivier versus City of Brandon
[00:29:04] Trump versus Slaughter
[00:30:31] National Republican Senatorial Committee versus Federal Election Commission
[00:32:04] Hamm versus Smith
[00:33:12] FS Credit versus Saba
[00:33:52] Final Thoughts and Conclusion

38,476 Listeners

25,861 Listeners

5,107 Listeners

376 Listeners

678 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

6,301 Listeners

32,354 Listeners

7,207 Listeners

5,794 Listeners

2,433 Listeners

3,901 Listeners

382 Listeners

745 Listeners

36 Listeners