Ever lose track of a shipment and spend hours piecing together where the breakdown happened? You’re not alone. Most supply chains are basically black boxes—one small glitch, and suddenly orders, inventory, and deliveries are scattered across different apps. But what if you could finally see every moving part in real time, all in one place? Let’s break down how Microsoft Fabric, tied to Dynamics 365 SCM, turns chaos into a data-driven system—and why this changes everything for how you manage operations.What Real Visibility Looks Like—And Why Most Supply Chains Miss ItIf you’ve ever stared at a dozen dashboards and still couldn’t tell if a specific pallet made it onto the right truck, you know the pain of false visibility. There’s always another tab to open, another spreadsheet to chase down, or an email thread that might hold the answer—if anyone even replied. We all know what it feels like to be awash in info yet somehow totally in the dark when the big question lands: Where is my customer’s order, right now? And what happens if it’s not actually where we think it is?The surprising part is that having more data doesn’t fix it. Most organizations collect mountains of numbers. But when you take a closer look, you’ll see what’s really happening: each number lives in its own tiny box. Inputs like purchase orders, process steps like manufacturing runs, and outputs like delivered goods—they’re sliced across different apps, different teams, and often, several continents. You get dashboards for inventory, dashboards for shipping, dashboards for production. Each one flashes green and red lights, but none of them truly show you how material moves from start to finish. It’s like running a factory with the lights off, just peeking through little pinholes.Here’s where the cracks start to show. Most supply systems treat every transaction like an isolated moment: one invoice in, one item out, one status change at a time. The relationships—the actual chain that ties a vendor to an inbound delivery, to your assembly line, to your outbound shipments—are invisible. So, the instant one link slips up, there’s no warning until the backlog starts, or worse, a customer reaches out to ask why their package still hasn’t shipped. One weak link, and the ripple effect is everywhere.Case in point, let’s talk about a client in consumer electronics. They thought they had solid dashboards and weekly reports showing inventory, logistics, production schedules—the works. Then, out of nowhere, assembly halted for three days because a key component got stuck at a warehouse an hour away. Their reports all showed “in stock.” Their ERP flagged everything as healthy. But the underlying relationship—the movement of that exact part through each checkpoint—was lost. Their teams scrambled, called vendors, checked with drivers, but only pieced together what went wrong after the fact. By then, they’d missed a full week of revenue and had teams working overtime to catch up.If you break down what needs to happen in a supply chain, the Input-Process-Output—or IPO—model gives you the roadmap. Raw materials come in, manufacturing transforms them, logistics moves finished goods, and, eventually, delivery puts the result in your customer’s hands. Simple, right? Except each stage depends totally on visibility into the ones before and after it. The handoffs are where most systems fall short. It’s like counting the calories you eat, but having no idea how your body’s actually using that energy—so you’re always reacting after it’s too late.Part of the blame lands on the usual suspects: spreadsheets and siloed ERP modules. Excel works until, suddenly, you’re chasing dozens of versions across email threads and file shares. Legacy ERP splits information across inventory, finance, purchasing, and logistics modules. If your warehouse data lives separately from vendor performance and transport updates, good luck tracing where the problem started—let alone predicting the next one. It’s the ultimate game of telephone, and by the time the signal reaches you, something’s bound to get lost in translation.And for all the talk about “digital transformation,” the reality on the ground isn’t much different. A recent study from the Association for Supply Chain Management found that only 22% of companies can trace a product all the way from supplier to final delivery. Most still struggle to connect the sizzle of internet-of-things sensors, automated warehouses, and endless dashboards into a real, continuous feedback loop. You get transaction history, not the living, breathing flow of relationships over time.So, the next time someone says “we have all the data,” ask if their data tells the whole story—can you see the journey of a single item, across every checkpoint, with the same context your customer has? Or are you just looking at a patchwork of numbers that only offer snapshots, never the real narrative?Real visibility isn’t about hoarding numbers; it’s about connecting dots from raw input to final output and, more importantly, understanding the dependencies in between. The trick isn’t just having information—it’s making sure it flows, in both directions, and brings the whole process into focus the moment something changes. Once you see the difference between data and true visibility, you start to realize how much time gets lost chasing symptoms instead of fixing root causes. And that’s where most supply chains run into trouble, staying stuck in the cycle of reactive firefighting.If you want to leap past the dashboards and finally get ahead, you need a way to actually stitch everything together—turning those isolated signals into a living, responsive system. So, how does Microsoft Fabric actually pull this off, giving every team member the smarts to keep things moving without all the wasted scrambling?Turning Data Into a Nervous System: How Fabric and Dynamics 365 SCM Sync UpLet’s talk about the classic mistake most teams make when they hear about “integration.” The assumption is always the same: just plug in a new tool, funnel in more raw data, and everything magically gets clearer. If you’ve ever rolled out a new analytics stack and watched everyone keep exporting to Excel anyway, you know how that really goes. More data doesn’t mean better decisions if it just piles up in the same old silos. What you really need is a way for all those live updates—stock levels, purchase orders, vendor scorecards—to form one interconnected system that always knows what’s happening right now, not just what happened last week.That’s where Microsoft Fabric comes in, and the best way to think about it isn’t as just another warehouse for dumping information. It’s more like giving your entire supply chain a central nervous system—one that takes every signal from Dynamics 365 SCM and actually reacts to it. This means instead of everyone manually piecing together what’s changed from twenty different screens, relevant updates ripple out in real time, no matter what part of the chain they come from. It’s the difference between taping together old walkie-talkies and actually wiring up the phones for a live conversation.Dynamics 365 SCM, on its own, throws off data constantly: shipments leaving the warehouse ping updates to the ERP, production lines create new records as batches move through, and vendor portals spit out alerts about materials en route. Each team usually has its own interface, tailored reports, and notification settings—but half the time, these systems don’t talk to each other until someone manually pushes the info around. Miss an update between modules, and suddenly you’re in the dark until someone notices a shortfall or an overrun.Let’s walk through a typical order process. Imagine a sales team lands a batch of new orders late Friday. That alone should set off a chain reaction: first, the inventory pool checks if there’s enough finished stock to fill the orders. If not, the system should alert procurement to start restocking materials and ping logistics to figure out lead times for suppliers. Meanwhile, vendor performance dashboards check whether the best-rated supplier can actually deliver on time, and if not, look for alternates right away—all without anyone having to decipher status codes or chase down spreadsheets.With Fabric in the mix, Dynamics 365 SCM speaks a common language. As soon as those new orders hit, Fabric scoops up signals from every corner—real-time stock counts, live shipment ETAs, batch status from production, and supplier updates directly from the vendor portal. Instead of waiting for a scheduled batch report or a weekly export, Fabric pipes all this into a live analytics layer. Here, the system constantly correlates what’s happening now—like a late shipment or a spike in order volume—with rules for automatic action. If a shipment is running late, Fabric chains the event right through to logistics, which might reroute trucks, notify backup suppliers, or, if needed, prompt human intervention.The old way lags behind, buried under what are called “lagging indicators”—those reports that show you what went wrong days after the fact. But using Fabric, you start to work with “leading indicators.” These are real-time alerts powered by machine learning models that flag small issues before they snowball. For example, if sensor data shows stock levels are dipping below a critical threshold, the alert fires instantly and kicks off a restock workflow. When orders start spiking—maybe a big promotion just went live—Fabric sees the spike and triggers procurement and manufacturing before you’re out of stock or drowning in backorders.Here’s a clear use case: A major beverage distributor recently faced a sudden surge in demand from a national ad campaign. With their old setup, procurement wouldn’t get the memo until Monday’s report. By then, they’d be bleeding money, lost sales, and angry phone calls. After moving to Fabric pipelines synced with Dynamics 365 SCM, that spike in sales vol

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Ever wonder why HR reports never seem to match up, even when you’re drowning in Microsoft 365 data? Today, you’ll finally see how Microsoft Fabric can unify your Dynamics 365 HR data and bring outside sources into one reliable dashboard—without the spreadsheet stress. If you’ve ever spent hours reconciling onboarding stats, leave requests, or attrition numbers, this is the hands-on walkthrough you need. Curious how all those metrics actually come together? Watch as we transform tangled HR data into crystal-clear insights you’ll wish you had yesterday.Why HR Data Unification Isn’t Optional AnymoreIf you’ve ever tried to run a simple attrition report and ended up bouncing between five tabs, three different systems, and a spreadsheet that never quite matches up, you already know how frustrating disconnected HR data can be. It’s supposed to be easy—a headcount here, an onboarding timeline there—and yet, you’re piecing it together like you’re solving a jigsaw puzzle with half the pieces missing their edges. Every week, you need to reconcile headcount with Finance, see who started or left, confirm pending onboarding, validate leave balances, and answer that one inevitable question: “Are we at risk of losing people?” The reality is, HR teams spend more time tracking down numbers than making decisions with them.This is the daily grind in most HR departments that haven’t unified their data. You’ve got your core system—maybe it’s Dynamics 365, SAP, or something older—holding the “official” record of employees. But payroll is sitting over in a cloud service, time tracking lives in yet another platform, and when someone wants a report on demographics or burnout risk, you’re left pulling CSV exports and hoping nothing changed overnight. The spreadsheets get longer, the data gets older, and the trust in those numbers gets shakier every month. Every time a department head wants a new metric—attrition trend, onboarding bottleneck, DEI stats—you’re flipping between systems, re-keying data, and resolving numbers that absolutely never match up with IT’s roster or the payroll report from last quarter.This isn’t just annoying. It changes how HR decisions are made. When you can’t get trustworthy, up-to-date numbers on who’s leaving, why onboarding is stalling, or how leave balances are stacking up, you don’t make decisions—you make guesses. Workforce planning becomes a finger-in-the-air exercise. Roles get backfilled twice, or not at all, because no two sources agree on who’s eligible or who’s even on the team. Talent moves fast, especially in today’s hybrid world, but HR decision-making stays stuck in last week’s numbers. That’s how onboarding stalls get missed, budget forecasts go sideways, and people who are burning out go unnoticed until it’s too late.Let’s talk about why this matters so much now. Hybrid work has changed the pace of talent movement. People join and leave faster, with less face-to-face checking in. If your data drags a week behind, by the time you identify a problem—say, a spike in leave requests or a pattern in voluntary exits—that trend has already cost you. The stakes used to be bad reporting and a few embarrassing moments in meetings. Now? Mistakes cost real money. Bad headcount planning leads to overhiring or layoffs. Delayed onboarding means teams sit without the skills they need, so projects slip. And because HR can’t prove their case with joined-up data, they get left out of the room where budget and strategy are set.Here’s what this looks like in real life. At one global tech company, HR noticed voluntary turnover creeping up, but nobody could agree on how big the problem was. The numbers for terminations from the payroll system didn’t match what was marked in the HR core. Meanwhile, IT was offboarding accounts without double-checking with HR, so phantom users stuck around—a mess for both compliance and security. But the worst part? Because nobody had a clear line of sight over time off, overtime, and exit interviews, the trend of burnout didn’t get flagged. By the time anyone had pieced it all together using old-school exports, several top-performing engineers had already left for competitors, and the team’s projects were falling behind. All because HR was stuck reconciling last month’s data instead of acting now.This isn’t a rare story. The numbers put it in black and white. According to recent studies, HR teams spend up to 40% of their time wrangling data from siloed sources, cleaning up duplicates, filling in gaps, or emailing people for corrections—time that could be spent actually supporting people or spotting issues early. Multiply that effort across onboarding, offboarding, compliance, payroll, and demographic reporting, and you start to see why HR feels buried and the business keeps running on assumptions.Let’s get real about the risk: every lost hour shuffling data is an hour not spent understanding your people or pushing HR up the ladder of business strategy. When everything is in silos, crucial details slip through the cracks—missed attrition spikes, unaddressed onboarding bottlenecks, demographic trends that don’t get noticed until they hit Glassdoor. Slow response to change becomes the norm. HR misses out on influencing strategy, simply because the data isn’t there when it counts.So here’s the thing—unifying HR data isn’t just about making easier dashboards. It changes where HR sits at the table. When you bring all those scattered data streams together and they finally agree, HR can actually prove trends as they happen, back up workforce planning with reliable numbers, and anticipate problems before they cascade. Suddenly, HR isn’t just reporting what went wrong, but can forecast, advocate for resources, and shift plans to match the business.Of course, knowing the payoff is only half the battle. The real question—that one everyone asks after a failed integration project—is: what tools actually pull this off, without turning the data mess into an even bigger headache?What Actually Powers HR Analytics in Microsoft Fabric?If you’re used to thinking that a slick Power BI dashboard is all you need to fix HR’s data headaches, you’re about to hit a wall. Power BI has its place, but the magic really happens with Microsoft Fabric’s lakehouse model. This is what actually changes the game for HR analytics—not another reporting tool, but a built-for-purpose data foundation. Here’s what that hype is about, and why it’s not just another fancy layer on top of what you’re already running.Let’s get this out of the way: most HR teams start the same way. The business wants numbers, so you bring in Power BI, point it at your Dynamics 365 HR system, maybe connect Excel if you’re brave, and then build visualizations. At first, it’s better than nothing. But if you’ve done this for more than a month, you’ve seen what happens. Fresh dashboard, same old data mess. Each report reflects just one source at a time—onboarding from Dynamics, demographics from your payroll export, leave balances from yet another spreadsheet. The pretty graphs just give you a faster way to spot what’s missing. And when someone asks for a metric that bridges more than one of those systems—good luck getting everything to line up without days of clean-up.This is the trap a lot of teams fall into: thinking a shiny visualization layer solves fragmentation underneath. You end up building workaround on top of workaround. That’s how dashboards drift apart, numbers don’t reconcile, and the cycle of manual exports and late-night spreadsheet edits continues. The problems aren’t just about what’s on the screen—it goes all the way down to where and how your data is stored and prepped.So what does Fabric bring? The real power in Microsoft Fabric isn’t about visualization at all. It’s the combination of three pieces: the lakehouse, Dataflows Gen2, and Power BI. If you want analytics that don’t break when the business changes, you need them working together. Here’s how they actually fit.First, the lakehouse is the new home base for HR data. If you haven’t worked with lakehouses, think of them as the “one version of the truth” for your organization’s information. Instead of locking data in separate silos—one table for Dynamics, another for payroll, scattered files from external partners—the lakehouse collects everything into a single, scalable, cloud-based location. Fabric’s lakehouse can store structured and semi-structured HR data, so you capture everything from core employee records to external survey results, onboarding checklists, and even Excel-based time tracking. It’s not just about having all the files in one folder; it’s about being able to query, join, and cross-reference any piece of HR data you have, whenever you need it.That’s where Dataflows Gen2 comes in. Think of Dataflows as your digital assembly line. They grab incoming data from Dynamics 365 HR and external sources, clean it up, shape it, and land it in the Fabric lakehouse in a ready-to-use format. Instead of dozens of manual steps—export here, import there, rewrite the same data transformation every month—Dataflows Gen2 lets you automate the boring parts. You define the source and the rules for prepping (things like mapping fields, standardizing job titles, normalizing department codes), and the process runs on a schedule. Now you have all your HR data—up to date, formatted correctly, and with the mess cleaned out—without a single CSV shuffle.Then there’s Power BI, but not as the main event. With the Fabric architecture, Power BI switches from being just a reporting surface into a true front end for your lakehouse data model. It’s analyzing real HR data that’s already been unified and validated in the lakehouse—not making guesses from half-synced sources. Any dashboard you build is showing metrics from the actual source of truth, with the benefit of refresh cycles and the consistency that comes with automation. That means your onboarding durations, leave balances, workforce demograph

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Ever tried connecting Power Automate to Dynamics 365, only to hit a brick wall with the standard connector? You're in the right place. Today, we're exposing the exact steps to break through those limitations—no more workarounds or hair-pulling. Curious to see how custom connectors can instantly solve your toughest integration headaches?What Happens When Standard Connectors Hit a Wall?If you’ve ever built a flow and reached the finish line only to realize the Dynamics 365 connector won’t fetch that one field, you’re not alone. It’s strangely common. You might have all the standard triggers and actions set up, but the moment you need something beyond basic records—a custom table, a calculated column, or more flexible filtering—it just doesn’t show up. Suddenly, your flow is only half as useful as you hoped. And the worst part? It’s not obvious at first glance which pieces are missing. It feels like staring into the fridge at 6 p.m.—plenty of stuff there, but nothing that adds up to an actual meal.Picture a typical team trying to use Power Automate to manage daily business processes in Dynamics 365. Maybe it’s about moving customer leads from point A to point B or syncing support tickets to an external dashboard. Everything should just connect. But when the process calls for grabbing a value from a custom entity—let’s say “Warranty Claims” or “VIP Account Status”—the standard connector just shrugs. That data simply isn’t exposed. So, someone prints out a report, walks across the hall, and starts copying values by hand. It’s 2024, and we’re suddenly back to the days of double-entry. If you’ve ever listened to coworkers grumble about retyping the same number in two different systems, you know the feeling. There’s just that undercurrent of “why exactly are we doing this?”The workaround phase starts here. People give up on automation and settle for a parade of Excel downloads, copy-paste sessions, or, if they're more daring, spinning up some half-documented flow that scrapes data from emails or exports. Meanwhile, every new request gets punted back to IT with the same answer: “Sorry, the connector doesn’t support that.” The reality is, manual workarounds aren’t just slow. They’re open invitations for mistakes. Typing errors, missed updates, and mismatched data have a way of stacking up. And those little discrepancies—or big ones, depending on your luck—turn into lost revenue, bad reporting, or frustrated clients down the line.If you zoom out to watch a full week in one of those organizations, you’ll see some classic symptoms. Someone spends part of every Friday yelling at their screen because a scheduled flow ran but didn’t actually update the critical custom field. Monday rolls around and someone else spots the error, but only after a customer points it out. Management holds another meeting to talk about “digital transformation.” Meanwhile, teams are resending invoices and apologizing for delays that automation was supposed to fix in the first place. Microsoft’s forums and Power Users groups are full of threads where admins plead for help getting data out of custom entities or applying more advanced filters—usually met with a mixture of sympathy and “you’ll probably need a custom connector for that.”Advanced filtering is another big source of frustration. Let’s say you want to pull only records changed in the last 48 hours, or filter based on a calculated status. The default connector might handle simple queries, but the moment you want to slice data a bit finer, you hit restrictions. This isn’t just a technical nuisance—these missed granular details might mean your sales dashboard isn’t up to date, or your compliance workflow skips over key cases. For some teams, the inability to fetch a small detail from Dynamics means the automation puzzle just never gets finished. There’s always a piece missing.You can see the pattern repeat in every discussion about Power Platform’s promise versus the actual day-to-day. The marketing says automate everything, connect anything, let your teams focus on what matters. The lived reality for admins and business users is a bit messier. Instead of eliminating busywork, sometimes Power Automate just reshuffles it, moving the manual effort from the field team to a “data specialist” toggling between screens. When a connector doesn’t surface the one field you need or fails to trigger on an event unique to your business, you’re left asking: Is this actually making things better, or just making the same work look more modern?Plenty of interviews and community Q&As showcase that irritation. Power Platform forums are filled with folks wrestling with the same handful of limitations, swapping tales of feature requests, add-on solutions, and of course, workarounds that involve more steps rather than fewer. It’s not a niche problem. In fact, mentioning “custom connectors” in those spaces is almost like using a secret password that signals you’ve moved beyond the basics and are ready to actually solve the problem—without waiting for Microsoft to add support three releases from now.If you’ve ever felt that sense of frustration—seeing a world of automation just out of reach, thanks to a missing connector feature—you’re not imagining things. The spot where the standard connector gives up is usually where the business needs things to “just work.” And if you don’t stop to notice those gaps, you can end up automating a workflow that still needs just as much manual cleanup.So, the very first step is to actually pinpoint which Dynamics 365 endpoints or features aren’t supported—because once you’re clear on exactly what you’re missing, you can finally decide if building your own connector is the answer. For most people, though, the question that follows is: even if you know the connector can’t help, how are you supposed to find that hidden Dynamics 365 API endpoint you actually need?And this is usually where things start to get a lot more interesting.Finding the Right Dynamics 365 APIs—Without Losing Your MindIf you’ve ever tried to pull a single field out of Dynamics 365 using Power Platform, you know the documentation rabbit hole that follows. You realize it’s not about just finding an API—it’s figuring out which of the hundreds of options actually gets you what you want. Dynamics 365 exposes a massive set of APIs, and every time Microsoft changes a feature or renames something, another endpoint surfaces somewhere in the mix. It’s less like opening a neatly labeled toolbox, and more like sorting a drawer where every tool half-matches the label.So, let’s say you’re staring at your flow, blocked by the standard connector. You’re ready to hunt that missing data field, but now the real detective work begins. The official docs are thick enough to double as a doorstop, and even with a map it’s not always clear which route to take. Sometimes you think you’ve pinned down the right API, only to find that it’s deprecated or missing the action you need. Other times, you stumble onto endpoints marked as “preview” with a quiet warning that they may change any time. Then there’s the maze of naming—one entity is listed as “accounts” in one corner, “customer” in another, and the table name might use an older term from Dynamics CRM days.If you’ve been at this for a while, you know how quickly an afternoon can disappear just trying to match real business needs with the right endpoints. The kicker is, some endpoints seem designed for legacy clients, some use OData v4, some are tailored to newer Web API conventions, and others only exist for backward compatibility. Let’s not even start on SOAP. Just unlocking the specifics about which endpoint lines up with your custom data model can feel like reading a crossword puzzle where half the clues are swapped out every version.Here's where things can really go sideways. Say your business has a custom entity—maybe “Warranty Claims,” “Special Pricing Configs,” or some edge-case table from an ISV solution. You search the documentation, but no clear API reference jumps out. Instead, you flip through forum posts and realize others have hit the same wall. One admin spends a night digging through the metadata browser, another runs Fiddler to watch what happens when the Dynamics UI loads that data, and a third just gives up and calls for outside help. Even getting the entity name spelled correctly is an adventure—schemas, logical names, display names, and case sensitivity can all trip you up.When the endpoint finally surfaces, it might not quite fit what you imagined. Maybe it returns all records, but filtering is awkward. Or it wants a totally different authentication flow. Worse, sometimes you get access to more data than you intended, raising the risk of leaking sensitive records if you aren’t careful with permissions. Suddenly, what should have been a simple data retrieval becomes a game of “what did I just expose, and who can get to it?” Everyone wants that Goldilocks zone: not too much data, not too little, and only what your business role actually needs.A lot of teams rely on Microsoft’s API Explorer, and it’s actually a strong starting point—when it works. It lets you probe the available endpoints, poke around with live queries, and see how Dynamics interprets your requests. But if you want a deeper dive, tools like Postman or Fiddler give you a window into what’s really happening under the hood. By capturing traffic between your browser and the Dynamics server, you can reverse-engineer the exact requests the UI is making—sometimes exposing unofficial endpoints that don’t show up anywhere in the documentation. Fair warning: that shortcut comes with its own risks, since undocumented APIs can disappear overnight.There’s a learning curve around permissions, too. Not every API you discover will honor your security model. You might get a 401 error, or worse, find out your test user can see data they shouldn’t because a misconfigured privilege in Dynamics was copied forward into the

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Most data engineers only find out about pipeline failures when someone from finance asks why their dashboard is stuck on last week. But what if you could spot – and fix – issues before they cause chaos?Today, we'll show you how to architect monitoring in Microsoft Fabric so your pipelines stay healthy, your team stays calm, and your business doesn't get blindsided by bad data. The secret is system thinking. Stick around to learn how the pros avoid pipeline surprises.Seeing the Whole Board: Four Pillars of Fabric Pipeline MonitoringIf you’ve ever looked at your Fabric pipeline and felt like it’s a mystery box—join the club. The pipeline runs, your dashboards update, everyone’s happy, until suddenly, something slips. A critical report is empty, and you’re left sifting through logs, trying to piece together what just went wrong. This is the reality for most data teams. The pattern looks a lot like this: you only find out about an issue when someone else finds it first, and by then, there’s already a meeting on your calendar. It’s not that you lack alerts or dashboards. In fact, you might have plenty, maybe even a wall of graphs and status icons. But the funny thing is, most monitoring tools catch your attention after something has already broken. We all know what it’s like to watch a dashboard light up after a failure—impressive, but too late to help you.The struggle is real because most monitoring setups keep us reactive, not proactive. You patch one problem, but you know another will pop up somewhere else. And the craziest part is, this loop just keeps spinning, even as your system gets more sophisticated. You can add more monitoring tools, set more alerts, make things look prettier, but it still feels like a game of whack-a-mole. Why? Because focusing on the tools alone ignores the bigger system they’re supposed to support. The truth is, Microsoft Fabric offers plenty of built-in monitoring features. Dig into the official docs and you’ll see things like run history, resource metrics, diagnostic logs, and more. On paper, you’ve got coverage. In practice though, most teams use these features in isolation. You get fragments of the story—plenty of data, not much insight.Let’s get real: without a system approach, it’s like trying to solve a puzzle with half the pieces. You might notice long pipeline durations, but unless you’re tracking the right dependencies, you’ll never know which part actually needs a fix. Miss a single detail and the whole structure gets shaky. Microsoft’s own documentation hints at this: features alone don’t catch warning signs. It’s how you put them together that makes the difference. That’s why seasoned engineers talk about the four pillars of effective Fabric pipeline monitoring. If you want more than a wall of noise, you need a connected system built around performance metrics, error logging, data lineage, and recovery plans. These aren’t just technical requirements—they’re the foundation for understanding, diagnosing, and surviving real-world issues.Take performance metrics. It’s tempting to just monitor if pipelines are running, but that’s the bare minimum. The real value comes from tracking throughput, latency, and system resource consumption. Notice an unexpected spike, and you can get ahead of backlogs before they snowball. Now layer on error logging. Detailed error logs don’t just tell you something failed—they help you zero in on what failed, and why. Miss this, and you’re stuck reading vague alerts that eat up time and patience.But here’s where a lot of teams stumble: they might have great metrics and logs, but nothing connecting detection to action. If all you do is collect logs and send alerts, great—you know where the fires are, but not how to put them out. That brings up recovery plans. Fabric isn’t just about knowing there’s a problem. The platform supports automating recovery processes. For example, you can trigger workflows that retry failed steps, quarantine suspect dataset rows, or reroute jobs automatically. Ignore this and you’ll end up with more alerts, more noise, and the same underlying problems. The kind of monitoring that actually helps you sleep at night is one where finding an error leads directly to fixing it.Data lineage is the final pillar. It’s the piece that often gets overlooked, but it’s vital as your system grows. When you can map where data comes from, how it’s transformed, and who relies on it, you’re not just tracking the pipeline—you’re tracking the flow of information across your whole environment. Imagine you missed a corrupt batch upstream. Without lineage, the error just ripples out into reports and dashboards, and you’re left cleaning up the mess days later. But with proper lineage tracking, you spot those dependencies and address root causes instead of symptoms.It doesn’t take long to see how missing even one of these four pillars leaves you exposed. Error logs without a recovery workflow just mean more alerts. Having great metrics but no data lineage means you know something’s slow, but you don’t know which teams or processes are affected. Get these four pieces working together and you move from scrambling when someone shouts, to preventing that shout in the first place. You shift from patchwork fixes to a connected system that flags weak spots before they break.Here’s the key: when performance metrics, error logs, data lineage, and recovery plans operate as a single system, you build a living, breathing monitoring solution. It adapts, spots trends, and helps your team focus on improvement, not firefighting. Everyone wants to catch problems before they hit business users—you just need the right pillars in place.So, what does top-tier “performance monitoring” actually look like in Fabric? How do you move beyond surface-level stats and start spotting trouble before it avalanches through your data environment?Performance Metrics with Teeth: Surfacing Issues Before Users DoIf you’ve ever pushed a change to production and the next thing you hear is a director asking why yesterday’s data hasn’t landed, you’re not alone. The truth is, most data pipelines give the illusion of steady performance until someone at the business side calls out a missing number or a half-empty dashboard. It’s one of the most frustrating parts of working in analytics: everything looks green from your side, and then a user—always the user—spots a problem before your monitoring does.The root of this problem is the way teams often track the wrong metrics, or worse, they only track the basics. If your dashboard shows total pipeline runs and failure counts, congratulations—you have exactly the same insights as every other shop running Fabric out of the box. But that only scratches the surface. When you limit yourself to high-level stats, you miss lag spikes that slowly build up or those weird periods when a single activity sits in a queue twice as long as usual. Then a bottleneck forms, and by the time you notice, you’re running behind on your SLAs.Fabric, to its credit, surfaces a lot of numbers. There are run durations, data processed volumes, row counts, resource stats, and logs on just about everything. But it’s easy to get lost. The question isn’t “which metrics does Fabric record,” it’s “which metrics actually tip you off before things start breaking downstream?” Staring at a wall of historical averages or pipeline completion times doesn’t get you ahead of the curve. If a specific data copy takes twice as long, or your resource pool maxes out, no summary graph is going to tap you on the shoulder to warn that a pile-up is coming.There’s a big difference between checking if your pipeline completed and knowing if it kept pace with demand. Think of it like managing a web server. You wouldn’t just check if the server is powered on—you want to know if requests are being served in a timely way, if page load times are spiking, or if the server’s CPU is getting pinned. The same logic applies in Fabric. The real value comes from looking at metrics like throughput (how much data is moving), activity-specific durations (which steps are slow), queue durations (where jobs stack up), failure rates over time, and detailed resource utilization stats during runs.According to Microsoft’s own best practices, you should keep a watchful eye on metrics such as pipeline and activity duration, queue times, failure rates at the activity level, and resource usage—especially if you’re pushing the boundaries of your compute pool. Activity duration helps you highlight if a particular ETL step is suddenly crawling. Queue time is the early sign your resources aren’t keeping up with demand. Resource usage can reveal if you’re under-allocating memory or hitting unexpected compute spikes—both of which can slow or stall your pipelines long before an outright failure.Here’s where most dashboards let people down: static thresholds. Hard-coded alerts like “raise an incident if a pipeline takes more than 30 minutes” sound good on paper, but pipelines rarely behave that consistently in a real-world enterprise. One big file, a busy hour, or a temporary surge in demand and—bang—the alert fires, even if it’s a one-off. But watch what happens when you implement dynamic thresholds. Now, instead of fixed limits, your monitoring tools track historical runs and flag significant deviations from norms. That means your alerts fire for true anomalies, not just expected fluctuations. Over time, you get fewer false positives and better signals about real risks.Setting up this sort of intelligent alerting isn’t rocket science these days. You can wire up Fabric pipeline metrics to Power BI dashboards, log analytics workspaces, or even send outputs to Logic Apps for richer automation. It’s worth using tags and metadata in your pipeline definitions to tie specific metrics back to business-critical data sources or reporting layers. That way, if a high-priority pipeline starts creeping past its throughput baseline, you get informed b

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Ever feel like your month-end close is stuck in quicksand, trapping your finance team in endless journal validations and email ping-pong? What if you could automate approvals, streamline postings, and get real-time notifications—all in one seamless workflow using tools you already have?Today, I’ll show you, step by step, how to connect Power Automate, Dynamics 365 Finance, and Teams for a month-end close that’s smarter, faster, and nearly hands-off.Why Manual Month-End Close Holds Teams BackIf you’ve ever spent the last week of the month glued to spreadsheets and Outlook, you’re not alone. A typical close in a mid-sized finance team still looks like this: someone starts a workbook, maybe color-codes cells for each account owner, and then—almost instantly—teams start chasing missing lines, misplaced journal numbers, and yet another copy of the policy checklist. Updates trickle in through email chains. There’s at least one person pasting journal entries from a subsidiary file, hoping nothing gets overwritten. Approvals start as a set of requests but quickly turn into a ping-pong match, bouncing from folder to folder. Even with cloud solutions, almost everyone falls back to spreadsheets because it feels safer, or at least, more familiar than chasing workflows across three different apps.Pressures build from the first day and keep mounting up to deadline. The controller is tracking a growing tally of incomplete sign-offs late into the evening. No matter how many times you’ve standardized your templates or tried to centralize the signoff process, old habits never seem to die. That final Friday, you still see reminder emails with phrases like “Just checking if you saw this...” or “Quick nudge for your approval.” The process drags as the team waits for all the pieces to fall into place.Let’s look at what actually happens when steps still hang on manual work. Even if you’ve invested in Microsoft 365, like a lot of organizations have, much of the muscle memory is built around workarounds. Finance teams open Dynamics 365 Finance for reporting, but the heavy lifting—cross-checking, documenting, deciding who approves what—all plays out in Outlook and Excel. That brings us right back to classic bottlenecks: the spreadsheet isn’t locked down, so someone might change a figure without a digital trace. Deadlines create a sense of urgency, but when the process is manual, urgency just raises stress and doesn’t solve the real issues.Ask any controller about their worst-close story and you’ll probably get some version of this: one month, you’re close to wrapping things up, but you’re missing one crucial approval. You send three reminders, copy the manager, escalate to a director—only to learn that the original approver put on an out-of-office reply two days earlier and is relaxing on a beach somewhere. The domino effect stops the entire close process. No one else in the approval chain can move forward, and the close date slips. Nobody enjoys explaining that sort of delay to leadership or auditors.This isn’t just an anecdote. Industry data puts the typical month-end close at anywhere from six to ten days for mid-market companies, and as long as two weeks for more complex organizations. The longer the close takes, the higher the risk of spotting errors too late to correct them. Late entries or forgotten journals sometimes surface during audits, not during the close. Studies show that nearly 70% of finance teams have had at least one material error crop up during audit season thanks to missed or rushed approvals during month-end. Each manual handoff is a chance for human error, and those mistakes can turn into write-ups in the audit trail—at best—or heavy risk exposure, at worst.What’s interesting is that most organizations have access to Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365, and plenty are tinkering with Power Automate, even if it’s just for simple notifications. Yet when it comes to automating finance processes, especially month-end, old patterns persist. The tools are everywhere, but only a minority are truly connecting them to handle real workflow. That’s partly because teams assume finance automation means a huge technology lift. Sometimes it’s just a lack of guidance. Many teams worry about breaking something, losing control, or missing compliance—a real concern if you’re talking about financial data.So what goes wrong? First, manual handoffs mean no real-time tracking. If you’ve got ten journal batches waiting for approval, you’re relying on email threads and spot-checks to see where things are stuck. Second, visibility is almost always after the fact. By the time you realize who missed an approval, you’re running out the clock. Third, error detection is patchwork. One person might catch a duplicate journal, but if they’re busy or unavailable, the error gets through. There’s also the very real possibility of approvals being completely missed because they landed in an overflowing inbox.Given all that, the obvious question is: if every team has access to these tools, what’s stopping broader adoption of automation? Is it the actual complexity? Sometimes, sure, but often it’s just a culture of caution. It feels safer to stick with the known pain than to risk an automation misfire—especially if you’re the one on the hook for compliance. There’s also the challenge of not knowing where to start. Automation sounds expensive, or maybe it only feels relevant to massive companies with an army of IT support.But here’s what teams miss: automation for month-end close isn’t about futuristic AI systems. We’re talking about making approvals flow where your team already works. It can be done without rewriting core processes or needing six months of consulting. You can actually cut cycle times by automating the most stubborn approval and validation steps, and audit trails become automatic, not a chore to catch up on later.So if you’ve ever wondered if all this could be easier, the answer is yes—it’s available, it’s practical, and you probably already own the licenses. The challenge is knowing how to bring Dynamics 365 Finance, Power Automate, and Teams together so your workflow finally matches how your team actually wants to work. And that’s exactly where we’re heading next—how can you actually build this workflow, step by step, to make automation the default and not just another tech project you never quite finish?Connecting Power Automate to D365 Finance: The Unlocked ShortcutIntegrating Power Automate with Dynamics 365 Finance might sound like the sort of project that takes half your admin’s weekend and a six-page permissions matrix, but the reality is a lot less intimidating. You don’t need a secret map to hidden configuration settings, though you do need a clear idea of what D365 expects at each step. The good news is, if you know what to set up ahead of time, connecting these systems doesn’t have to stall your project before it even starts.Let’s talk through what you have to get right up front—the nuts and bolts that trip up most teams. First, there’s the basics inside Dynamics 365 Finance. You’ll need a user account with rights to the Finance and Operations APIs. “User” here isn’t an excuse to grant every privilege under the sun. The safer way is to either use a service account given only API access, or better yet, an actual user with only the journals and legal entities in scope. If you try firing up the connector with your own admin login, you’ll have more access than needed and potentially more risk. Next, check your Power Automate licensing. If you’re running on E3 or E5, you may have basic flows, but for heavier automation—like pulling journal line details, triggering from status changes, or posting entries—you’ll want at least a per-user or per-flow license with premium connectors enabled.Licensing is usually the “surprise” step, and it’s where pilots buckle if no one planned for premium tier access. You also need to enable the D365 Finance and Operations connector within Power Automate—not just the generic Dynamics connector. This specific connector unlocks direct triggers and actions for journal entries, approvals, and status updates. That’s where most teams get stuck. It’s tempting to just grab the simpler Common Data Service connector because it looks familiar or faster, but it’s missing all the journal-specific triggers that keep flows efficient. So, before you even start, double-check you’re using the D365 Finance and Operations connector and that all permissions map back to your minimum-rights principle.Once you’re authenticated, you can start to pull data straight from the source. Typical triggers you’ll see include events like “When a journal is created,” “When a journal is posted,” or “When status changes to pending approval.” Here’s where you need to make a decision—what really matters for your workflow? In a clean process, you might kick off the flow as soon as a journal record is created, but in reality, it makes more sense to trigger when a journal hits “ready for approval.” That way, you don’t flood your workflow with incomplete entries or draft lines that never get submitted. Filtering by type, such as only “General” journals or only ones over a certain dollar threshold, happens right here on the trigger. This isn’t about being fancy—it’s about reducing noise downstream so only relevant journals move through your automation.Now, while it’s tempting to go broad with access and just “make it work,” that decision can haunt you. There’s no shortage of stories where a team, desperate to get things rolling, gave service accounts wide-ranging Finance access, and only later realized they’d opened a backdoor to sensitive payroll data. Least-privilege access isn’t just something auditors like—it’ll keep accidental exposure down and prove security diligence when the inevitable questions come. If you’re not sure how to scope it, start with a single legal entity and strip away anything not needed for the approval chain. Review connect

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Ever built a Power App where the relationships got so tangled, you wondered if you were mapping out a business process or building a spaghetti monster? You’re in the right place. Today, we're breaking down Dataverse beyond just tables and columns—so you can finally connect those dots and avoid the chaos of custom logic gone wild.Why Simple Dataverse Apps Break Under PressureIf you’ve ever watched your Dataverse app grind to a halt the moment your dataset hits four or five digits, you’re definitely not alone. It’s a weird rite of passage: your first Dataverse app hums along with its nice little tables and columns, everything seems under control, and then—out of nowhere—the numbers climb, users multiply, and you’re stuck figuring out why a screen that took two seconds to load yesterday now just spins forever. It happens fast. The thing is, nearly everyone starts the same way. Pick your tables, drop in some columns, and the basic CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) stuff just... works. Maybe you even manage to get a view or two whipped up for reporting. But then reality checks in: the business wants automation, leadership asks for better dashboards, compliance wants audit history, and users expect integrations with that ancient ERP system they haven’t updated since 2008.All those requests pile up. It’s no longer “just add a column.” You’re roped into building approval flows, validation rules, maybe a custom import job for weekly uploads. Before you know it, your clean little app looks like it's been held together by duct tape and sticky notes. For every business rule that's missing from out-of-the-box, someone’s stuck copying values between fields, manually monitoring overdue items, or chasing missed updates. These quick fixes pile up—one Power Automate here, a patchwork of scripts there, and suddenly every new requirement tips the app one step closer to breaking.Here's a real-world scenario for you: A mid-sized company rolled out Dataverse to handle sales quoting. Ten reps loved it. Lookups worked, quotes generated, everything flowed. But as they started hiring and shifted from ten to a hundred users, performance tanked. Searching for quotes took ages, reports spun forever, and the once-simple logic for discount approvals spiraled into a web of overlapping rules. Suddenly, the quoting tool wasn’t just buggy. It became a source of daily complaints. Teams tried to patch things—slapping extra Power Automate flows on top, running exports to Excel for formulas, even building little workarounds in Teams chat to track exceptions. The more they added, the more unpredictable the results became. Simple changes started having ripple effects nobody expected. The hard truth? Most Power Apps that break under growth weren’t really set up to scale. They’re built with the “spreadsheet mindset.” It works fine when you’re a five-person team or just experimenting, but spreadsheets are designed for quick wins—you add a value, get a result, and if something breaks, you can usually spot the error in a cell pretty quickly. Dataverse isn’t meant for that. It’s a backend system, and it expects structure, clear relationships, automated flows, and rules that the system—not a person—enforces day-in, day-out.Let’s put it another way: imagine running an entire shipping company by handing sticky notes to the warehouse team and CC’ing everyone on every update. It might work the first week, but give it a month, add a few new routes, and—boom—missed deliveries and lost shipments. The same mess happens in Dataverse if all you focus on is throwing more tables or fields at a problem. When a single piece of information goes missing, or when automation doesn't kick in at the right moment, your app falls apart in ways that a spreadsheet rarely does. You end up firefighting—tracking down where rules got skipped, figuring out which imports duplicated records, or hunting for the reason someone’s dashboard isn’t matching the report from last week.So what’s actually missing from most Dataverse builds? It’s rarely just “more tables.” Growth exposes the gaps in how you structure relationships, where you automate the logic, and how your app keeps the right data in sync. Dataverse has all the pieces—custom tables, relationships, calculated columns, alternate keys—but if you only use the basics, you’re basically stacking up dominoes and hoping nobody sneezes. It’s how those pieces connect and talk to each other that turns a fragile tool into something that quietly handles scale, complexity, and all those inevitable “what if” scenarios the business throws your way.The difference between an app that barely works and one that grows with your company always comes down to the foundation. Think of advanced Dataverse components—like custom logic, calculated fields, alternate keys, and deep relationships—as guardrails and gears. Used early, they quietly keep things running as business changes. Wait until chaos hits, and you’re left cleaning up the mess, merging orphaned records, or fielding angry calls because approvals went missing.But simply adding more features—another field here, a shiny view there—won’t save you when core relationships and logic aren’t aligned. That’s where the real magic of Dataverse comes to life: when you build those connections in, and automation happens naturally. There’s a huge difference between layering in features after things break and weaving them into how your system works from the start. Let’s get into the mechanics of how advanced components actually hold everything together and form the kind of Dataverse app that doesn’t fall apart the minute someone asks for a new report. Because building a resilient system isn’t about more features—it’s about smarter connections.Custom Logic: The Heartbeat of Intelligent Dataverse AppsEver used an app and thought, “Wow, this thing just knows what I need,” while another app just sits there until you click a field or press save? That’s always the gap—real business software needs a brain, not just a form. Most of that “brainpower” is custom logic hiding under the surface. Out of the box, Dataverse gives you lists, lookups, and the CRUD basics, which gets your app off the ground. For basic needs, that’s fine—but business never stays simple for long. Once the requests start rolling in—real-time validation, nuanced approval rules, calculated notifications—it becomes clear that spreadsheets and simple forms can’t keep up.Here’s what trips everyone up: it’s tempting to bolt on your logic with Power Automate or just sprinkle in some plug-ins after the core tables are live. It’s fast, especially the first time you throw together an automated task or a quick fix. But the more you rely on ad-hoc flows and scripts, the more unpredictable your app becomes. Now, you’re living with automation that fires at the wrong times, business rules that trigger inconsistently, and behaviors nobody can explain—especially when it all happens outside Dataverse’s main data model. I’ve seen sales departments hit with “Overdue Invoice” alerts that show up out of nowhere—or worse, don’t show when they should. All because you wired up a Power Automate flow, but forgot about all the cases where an invoice is edited, voided, or marked as paid through another process.When business logic sits outside the model, it’s a recipe for confusion. A workflow might behave one way if a user updates a record in Dynamics 365, but another way if changes happen behind the scenes via API. Miss an edge case, and suddenly finance is hunting down why an invoice got flagged twice or missed a step altogether. This isn’t just academic—it rolls downhill, creating real pain for support teams, IT admins, and anyone who’s stuck troubleshooting weird, intermittent bugs. There’s also the issue of transparency. With floating, untracked automation, nobody really knows which rules fire when. Teams end up with flow charts on whiteboards, sticky notes to remember manual checks, or wiki pages trying to catalog which plug-ins or business rules might interact on a given table.That’s why the strongest Dataverse apps treat their custom logic as part of the actual data model. Plug-ins, workflows, and business rules aren’t just afterthoughts—they’re system components, almost like wiring or plumbing in a well-built house. Start with a plan for your logic, and you’re saving yourself hours of rework later. Try to add it in after the house is finished, and suddenly everything is messier, costlier, and way more prone to leaks. It’s funny—everyone thinks you’re cutting corners by “getting to MVP first” and circling back for smarter logic once business takes off. But when that wave hits, the cracks show immediately. You see duplicated efforts, misfired notifications, and those endless Slack threads where everyone debates why data moved—if it moved at all.The difference between bolted-on logic and first-class logic isn’t just about predictability. It’s about maintainability. Need to expand your approval process to include international teams? If your workflow started as inline, integrated logic, you just adjust a rule or tweak a condition. If your automation is scattered across a dozen Power Automate flows or hidden in JavaScript, you’re tracking down which one needs the update—and hoping you don’t break another branch. And forget about onboarding a new admin. When logic is baked right into the Dataverse model, it’s visible, auditable, and way easier to train someone on. There’s no mystery layer hiding the business rules. Everything sits right inside the tables and forms—just where you’d expect to find it.Imagine the alternative. Layering your logic on last is like building a beautiful house, only to realize you forgot the pipes until after the roof is on. Every hole you drill after the fact makes the place a little weaker and a lot harder to fix. It’s not just a mess for you, either—your users feel it. They deal with unexpected pop-ups, inconsistent validation, or workflows that b

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Ever wonder why your rolling forecast in D365 F&O never matches reality? If your finance data lives in silos and your dashboards pull from five different places, you're not alone. Let’s break down exactly how Microsoft Fabric unifies those scattered modules—GL, sub-ledgers, budgets—so your next forecast finally lines up with what really happens.Stay tuned to see how connecting the dots reveals insights you’ve been missing and makes variance reports practically build themselves.Why Your D365 F&O Data Feels Disjointed—And Why That MattersIf you’ve ever tried to explain a variance report from D365 F&O, you know that uneasy silence when you realize the numbers you’re quoting all trace back to a different source file. One line item was a last-minute export from the general ledger; another came from a sub-ledger dump downloaded three days earlier; and the budget numbers? Those lived in a spreadsheet that’s bounced between three inboxes since Monday. There’s that moment you say, “Let me get back to you on that,” and hope you can make all these numbers add up by tomorrow’s meeting. This is the story for most finance teams living with Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations day after day. The tools promise a single ERP, but the reality is more like a collection of narrow silos that only truly fit together in PowerPoint.Let’s talk about why these islands exist. In D365 F&O, the general ledger keeps a record of every journal entry—your overall financial story, but only at the highest level. Sub-ledgers log all the gritty transaction details—accounts payable, fixed assets, purchasing, sales. Good luck getting your GL trial balance to match the line-by-line details from the AP or AR sub-ledgers, especially if those modules close on separate schedules. Budgets, meanwhile, live in their own world, often managed as static files and uploaded just once each year. The system pulls reports from all these places, but each module uses different codes for cost centers, departments, or projects. Chart of accounts structures evolve, but not every module gets the same memo. A cost center code in the general ledger might not even exist in your asset register if someone forgot to update both places. In the end, we’re all running back and forth, trying to square off details from three different islands that insist on speaking their own dialects.This patchwork creates a reporting nightmare. One month’s close cycle stretches out because the AP sub-ledger needs time to reconcile manual adjustments, and the general ledger team is still chasing missing postings. The budgets submitted by department heads last quarter now need “just a small tweak” before they match reality, which means firing up another round of copy-paste marathons in Excel. If you’re explaining variance numbers to your CFO, every slight mismatch raises eyebrows—“Why does actuals versus budget have a $22,000 gap here?”—even though you know that most of those gaps come from timing delays between modules, not true business performance. The pressure mounts when audit season rolls around and no one can agree which table is the actual source of truth. There’s nothing quite like realizing the numbers you signed off on came from last week’s backup, not the current system.Outside the office, research confirms what you already feel. Gartner recently pointed out that organizations with fragmented financial data spend up to 50% more time on routine reporting than peers with unified data. That’s not an accounting quirk; it’s a direct cost in lost productivity. While D365 F&O’s sales pitch promises full integration, what you usually get is a set of modules engineered separately and merged along the way with a lot of manual patchwork. APIs exist, sure, but getting every piece to talk flawlessly—without middleware breaking after each update—requires more patience than most IT budgets allow. That’s why most of us quietly rely on exported spreadsheets and the legendary index-match formula to chase down the truth.It’s not just theoretical. Picture this: it’s 10:37 p.m. You’re hunched over your laptop, juggling the latest GL download and a subtotal pasted from last month’s fixed asset summary. You notice the numbers don’t quite line up—a $4,760 difference that shouldn’t be there. So, you scroll through the AP ledger, wondering who posted that late invoice adjustment. Somewhere in that sea of decimals, reality got a little fuzzier. Maybe your budget owner will spot it, maybe not—but you know it’s one more Achilles heel in the forecast you’re expected to explain tomorrow.Teams run into these disconnects every month. Reporting cycles slow down. Forecasting accuracy drifts. Worst case, decision-makers miss a trend because half the data was stale by the time the variance report landed on their desk. Nobody enjoys living in the world of after-hours Excel edits, hiding cell formulas, and triple-checking pivot tables for errors that shouldn’t even exist. It’s like modern ERP software dressed up with retro manual processes under the hood.Now, if you’re wondering why D365 F&O can’t unify everything out of the box: you’re not alone. Integration feels logical in demos, but real business data is messy. Chart of account codes change mid-year, departments get renamed, and project IDs don’t sync between modules unless you script specialized connectors. Most teams settle for “close enough” and hope the next release will really, finally, bring the dream of seamless reporting.But what if you could actually see the whole picture, without living in Excel or hiring a small army to clean up last-mile exports? Here’s the reality: before you can forecast anything with confidence, you need to understand exactly how these modules interact—or don’t. That clarity is the first step to reports and predictions that real humans can trust. So, the obvious question: if the modules resist natively working together, can you make them collaborate somewhere else—maybe in Fabric? Let’s look at how these systems can finally start talking the same language, and what it really takes to pull together a unified pipeline.Connecting the Dots: Building a Unified Data Pipeline with FabricMost finance teams have given up looking for a magic “sync all” button in D365 F&O. If you've ever seen your GL, AP, and project records living in their own corners, you're probably wondering if there’s any hope of turning that chaos into something actionable. That’s where Microsoft Fabric draws attention. It’s built for exactly this kind of problem—connecting raw data across business modules, pulling it into a single, unified model, and making reporting refresh itself instead of you racing toward another reporting deadline.Now, skepticism here is totally reasonable. Everyone’s crossed their fingers and started a “pilot” data integration project, only for it to get abandoned once someone discovers three critical reports rely on an old export workflow. No one wants to break what mostly works, even if it means dealing with endless copy-paste sessions. The beauty of Fabric is that it doesn’t force a rip-and-replace approach. Instead, it sets up connections—think of it as Stackable pipes—pulling only what you need from each module, on a schedule you decide, and feeding it into a workspace designed for analytics and forecasting.Let’s talk through the nuts and bolts of what extracting D365 F&O data actually means, because this step shapes everything after it. If you’re looking to build rolling forecasts, variance reports, or Power BI dashboards, three main groups of data matter most: the General Ledger (GL) journals, sub-ledger transactions (so, AP, AR, fixed assets), and your approved budgets or forecasts. In D365 F&O, you’ll usually be working with tables like LedgerJournalTrans for transactional GL detail, LedgerEntryJournal for your high-level GL movement, VendTrans and CustTrans for vendor and customer line items, and AssetTrans for tracking changes to fixed assets. Budget tables—often BudgetRegisterEntry—typically hold your planned figures, but they require careful mapping because budgeting structure can shift more than you’d expect. Pulling all this in isolation gives you fragments, but when combined through a proper pipeline, it’s the backbone of actually seeing where the money’s going.Setting up an actual, automated pipeline isn’t just picking a data connector and hoping it’ll run every night. Fabric offers first-party connectors directly into D365 F&O, supporting direct connections over OData or via Synapse Link for even larger datasets, without the file download bottleneck. The process usually starts in Fabric Dataflows, where you authenticate with an organizational account that has table-level read permissions in D365. You then define each dataflow—pulling in the GL details, AP transactions, budgets—setting up schedules that match your reporting cadence. Data privacy is non-negotiable: you’ll want least-privilege access on every connection and API key, with Azure Active Directory handling most of the grunt work around authorization.When you get to modeling, here’s where things come alive. Imagine pulling a complete chart of accounts out of D365, flattened and mapped to the rest of your organization’s dimensions—departments, business units, maybe even products. You’ll likely export a DimMainAccount table, but it doesn’t end there. Dimensions like business unit or project usually live in their own tables (think DimensionAttributeValueSet), so you need to join them, sometimes many-to-many, into one readable structure. The practical upshot: if your CFO wants to drill from a rolled-up P&L straight down to a particular project’s cost overrun, they can do it without asking you for “just one more export.”It isn’t all roses at the transformation stage. Every team eventually hits the “why doesn’t this account exist in both places?” wall. You might find missing dimensions in sub-ledger entries, because a business unit field

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Here’s a question for you: what’s the real difference between using Dataflows Gen2 and a direct pipeline copy in Microsoft Fabric—and does it actually matter which you choose? If you care about scalable, error-resistant data ingest that your business can actually trust, this isn’t just a tech debate. I’ll break down each step, show you why the wrong decision leads to headaches, and how the right one can save hours later. Let’s get into the details.Why Dataflows Gen2 vs. Pipelines Actually Changes EverythingChoosing between Dataflows Gen2 and Pipelines inside Microsoft Fabric feels simple until something quietly goes sideways at two in the morning. Most teams treat them as tools on the same shelf, like picking between Pepsi and Coke. The reality? It’s more like swapping a wrench for a screwdriver and then blaming the screw when it won’t turn. Ingesting data at scale is more than lining up movement from point A to point B; it’s about trust, long-term sanity, and not getting that urgent Teams call when numbers don’t add up on a Monday morning dashboard.Let’s look at what actually happens in the trenches. A finance group needed to copy sales data from their legacy SQL servers straight into the lakehouse. The lead developer spun up a Pipeline—drag and drop, connect to source, write to the lake. On paper, it worked. Numbers landed on time. Three weeks later, a critical report started showing odd gaps. The issue? Pipeline’s copy activity pushed through malformed rows without a peep—duplicates, missing columns, silent truncations—errors that Dataflows Gen2 would have flagged, cleaned, or even auto-healed before any numbers reached reporting. The right tool could have substituted chaos with quiet reliability.We act like Meta and Apple know exactly what future features are coming, but in enterprise data? The best you get is a roadmap covered in sticky notes. Those direct pipeline copies make sense when you’re moving clean, well-known data. But as soon as the source sneezes—a schema tweak here, a NULL popping up there—trouble shows up. Using a Dataflow Gen2 here is like bringing a filter to an oil change. You’re not just pouring the new oil, you’re making sure there’s nothing weird in it before you start the engine.This isn’t just a hunch; it’s backed up by maintenance reports across real-world deployments. One Gartner case study found that teams who skipped initial cleansing with Dataflows Gen2 saw their ongoing pipeline maintenance hours jump by over 40% after just six months. They had to double back when dashboards broke, fixing things that could have been handled automatically upstream. Nobody budgets for “fix data that got through last month”—but you feel those hours.There’s also a false sense of security with Pipelines handling everything out of the box. Need to automate ingestion and move ten tables on a schedule? Pipelines are brilliant for orchestrating, logging, and robust error handling—especially if you’re juggling tasks that need to run in order, or something fails and needs a retry. That’s their superpower. But expecting them to cleanse or shape your messy data on the way in is like expecting your mailbox to sort your bills by due date. It delivers, but the sorting is on you.Dataflows Gen2 is built for transformation and reuse. Set up a robust cleansing step once and your upcoming ingestion gets automatic, consistent hygiene. You can create mapping, join tables, and remove duplicate records up front. Even better, you gain a library of reusable logic—so when something in the data changes, you update in one spot instead of everywhere. Remember our finance team and their pipeline with silent data errors? If they had built their core logic in Dataflows, they’d have updated the cleansing once—no more hunting for lost rows across every copy.And this bit trips everyone up: schema drift. Companies often act like their database shapes will stay frozen, but as business moves, columns get added or types get tweaked. Pipelines alone just shovel the new shape downstream. If a finance field name changes from “customerNum” to “customerID,” a direct copy often misses the mismatch until something breaks. Dataflows Gen2, with its data profiling and transformation steps, spots those misfits as soon as they appear—it gives you a chance to fix or flag before the bad data contaminates everything.Now, imagine you’re dealing with a huge SQL table—fifty million rows plus, with nightly refresh. If the ingestion plan isn’t thought out, Pipelines can chew up resources, blow through integration runtime limits, and leave your ops team sorting out throttling alerts. Without smart up-front cleansing and reusable transformation, even small data quirks can gum up the works. A badly timed schema tweak becomes a multi-day cleanup mission that pulls your best analysts off more valuable work.So here’s what matters. The decision on when to use Dataflows Gen2 versus Pipelines isn’t about personal workflow preferences, or which UI you like best—it’s about building a foundation that can scale and adapt. Dataflows Gen2 pays off when you need to curate, shape, and cleanse data before it hits your lake, locking in trust and repeatability. Pipelines shine when you need to automate, schedule, orchestrate, and handle complex routing or error scenarios. Skip Dataflows Gen2, and your maintenance costs jump, minor schema changes become ugly outages, and your business starts to lose trust in the numbers you deliver.Let’s see what it takes to actually connect to SQL for ingestion—right down to the nuts and bolts of locking security down before moving a single row.Securing and Scaling SQL Ingestion—No More NightmaresConnecting Microsoft Fabric to SQL should be routine, but you’d be surprised how quickly things get messy. One tiny shortcut with permissions, or overestimating what your environment can handle, and you start seeing either empty dashboards or, even worse, security warning emails stacking up. Balancing speed, scale, and security when you’re pulling from an enterprise SQL source is a lot like juggling while someone keeps tossing extra balls at you—miss one, and the consequences roll downhill.Take, for example, a company running daily sales analytics. Their IT team wanted faster numbers for the business, so they boosted the frequency of their data pulls from SQL. Simple enough—at least until the pipeline started pegging the SQL server with requests every few minutes. The next thing they knew? Email alerts from compliance: excessive read activity, heavy resource consumption, and throttling warnings from the database admin. What was meant to be a harmless speed boost flagged them for possible security issues and impacted actual business transactions. Instead of just serving the analytics team, now they had operations leadership asking tough questions about whether their data platform was secure—or just reckless.This is where designing your connection strategy up front actually pays off. Microsoft Fabric gives you a few options, and skipping the basics will catch up with you: always use managed identities when you can, and never give your ingestion service broad access “just to get it working.” Managed identities let Fabric connect to your SQL data sources without storing passwords anywhere in plain text. That’s less risk, fewer secrets flying around, and it’s aligned with least-privilege access policies—so the connector touches only what it should, nothing extra. If you’re new to this, you’ll find yourself working closely with Azure Active Directory, making sure permissions are scoped to the tables or views you need for your pipeline. It’s not glamorous, but it’s the groundwork that keeps your sleeping hours undisturbed.Performance is where most teams hit their first wall, especially with the kind of large SQL datasets you find in the enterprise. There’s a persistent idea that just letting the connector “pull everything” nightly is fine. In reality, that’s how you wind up with pipelines that run for hours—or fail halfway through, clogging up the rest of your schedule. Research from Microsoft’s own Fabric adoption teams has shown that, for most customers with tables in the tens of millions of rows, using batching and partitioning techniques can reduce ingestion times by 60% or more. Instead of one monolithic operation, you break up your data loads so that no single process gets overwhelmed, and you sidestep SQL throttling policies designed to stop accidental denial-of-service attacks from rogue analytics jobs.A related topic is incremental loading. Rather than loading an entire massive table every time, set up your process to grab only the new or changed data. This one change alone can mean the difference between a daily job that takes minutes versus hours. But you have to build in logic to track what’s actually new, whether that’s a dedicated timestamp field, a version column, or even a comparison of row hashes for the truly careful.The next bottleneck often comes down to the connector you pick. Fabric gives you native SQL connectors, but it also supports ODBC and custom API integrations. Choosing which one to use isn’t just about performance—it's about data sensitivity and platform compatibility too. Native connectors are usually fastest and most reliable with Microsoft data sources; they’re tested, supported, and handle most edge cases smoothly. ODBC, while more flexible, adds overhead and complexity, especially for advanced authentication or if you have unusual SQL flavors in the mix. Custom APIs can plug gaps where native connectors don't exist, but they put all the error handling and schema validation work on you. For truly sensitive data, stick with the native or ODBC options unless you have absolute control over the API and deep monitoring in place.Let’s talk about what happens when you get schema drift. You set up your pipeline, it works, and then the data owner adds a new column or changes a data type. Pipelines can move data faithfully, but t

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

What if your CRM data wasn’t stranded in Dataverse, but fueling insights across your business? Most organizations treat Dataverse like a walled garden, missing out on the analytics power of Fabric. Today, I’ll show you exactly how to punch a hole in that wall and bring your business data together—step by step, with live examples. Ready to watch your analytics light up in ways you’ve never seen? Let’s unlock Dataverse.Why Siloed Dataverse Data Leaves You GuessingIf you work in the world of Dynamics, you know the dance already. You log into your Dataverse-powered CRM, pull up those clean dashboards, and for a moment, it looks like everything makes sense. Pipeline by region. Open opportunities. Maybe you’re even splitting out case volumes or lead source. The numbers sit there on glossy charts, but the nagging feeling never really goes away: something’s missing. You can tell a story with these dashboards, but you’re forced to fill in the blanks because the context—the why behind the what—is usually nowhere in sight.And you’re not alone. Most organizations feed a ton of data into Dataverse. They treat it like the central vault—the default place for anything tied to customers, sales, and support. It makes sense, given how intertwined Dataverse is with standard CRM processes. Over time, the sales pipeline, contacts, activities, and support cases all find their way in, building up a sort of digital fossil record of your business relationships. But here’s the thing: Dataverse often ends up as this perfectly pruned garden with some impressively tall walls. You see what’s growing inside, but what’s going on just over the fence is a mystery.Take a typical sales manager. She’s staring down a revenue dip this quarter. The executive team wants answers—fast. She digs through Dataverse reports, tracking which leads closed and which didn’t, and it all looks straightforward enough. But the big question—why did things slow down?—can’t be answered within those walls. The marketing team has their own dashboards showing email open rates, campaign click-throughs, maybe some Google Analytics sprinkled on top. Website traffic took a dip, but no one can really say how that’s mapping onto the deals in the CRM. The result? A meeting where sales, marketing, and support each bring their own numbers, none of which quite line up, and the real story never gets told.And yes, this has consequences. A lot of companies assume that as long as they’re using “the same source of truth” for core data, they’re in good shape. The problem? When you treat Dataverse as the finish line instead of the starting block, you end up with half-baked analytics. Support data stays in its corner. Marketing attribution gets tracked somewhere else. Product usage or renewal signals might not make it in at all. Even something as common as a leads-to-opportunity conversion report turns slippery, because the activity trail is split over multiple systems.Think about it for a second: when was the last time your CRM dashboard explained a trend, instead of just describing it? Showing you sales by region is one thing. Helping you understand why certain campaigns tanked, or why renewals spiked after a service update—that requires more than Dataverse alone. And the problem compounds as your tech stack grows. Modern marketing runs on email, social, website personalization, webinars—none of which are Dataverse-native. Support might live in a separate system, or your product team might track usage with an entirely different tool. You’re left trying to stitch together the bigger picture with blindfolds on.It’s not just a productivity headache; it’s an executive-level trust issue. Recent studies show that over 60% of business leaders admit they second-guess their own analytics when those reports don’t cover all the business data. When each team chooses different reporting tools and data sources, you don’t just lose time to duplication—you risk making calls based on a partial view. That’s where real business risk creeps in. Forgotten opportunities. Marketing spend pointed at the wrong channels. Support trends buried under separate reporting silos. Bad data doesn’t just slow you down; it costs real money and lost deals.If you’re hoping Dataverse on its own will get you to the promised land of “unified analytics,” it’s like expecting a step counter to run your whole health plan. Sure, you know how many steps you took, but have you looked at your sleep, your calorie intake, or your heart rate? If you’re only tracking CRM interactions, you miss out on what happens before leads land in your funnel or after support closes a ticket. Business performance isn’t a single metric—it’s a combination of signals from dozens of places. And until those systems talk, everything else is just a nice-looking snapshot. Not a real diagnosis.What’s wild is how normal this still is. Most Dataverse analytics setups give you just enough to feel busy, but not enough to drive real decisions. The reports might be automated, the dashboards clear, but none of it breaks past the boundaries of the CRM. There’s a reason most annual reviews still include some variation of, “We don’t have the numbers we need.” And nobody wants to be the one explaining, after the fact, why a campaign failed or a customer churned, when the explanation was sitting in marketing data no one bothered to connect.The real danger here isn’t technical. It’s organizational paralysis. When teams hole up behind their data, nobody owns the full customer journey. Nobody can trace a marketing dollar to a closed deal—or a support complaint to lost revenue—because the pipes aren’t built. Instead, companies are forced to play catch-up, explaining in retrospect what might have gone wrong, instead of spotting it in real time.So if you’re tired of those blind spots—if you’re done guessing at cause and effect, and ready to start knowing—then you’ve got to kick down the walls. The fix isn’t another dashboard. It’s making Dataverse part of the bigger analytics engine—connecting it to Microsoft Fabric so you can finally put the whole story side by side, and start making calls based on what’s actually happening across your business. Now, let’s see what it actually takes to make that connection happen, without the usual permission headaches.Setting Up the Dataverse-Fabric Connection—No SurprisesConnecting Dataverse to Fabric sounds pretty simple until you actually sit down and try it. Microsoft shows you that clean “Connect” button and hints that your CRM data will just start flowing, but the reality is a bit less magical on the first run. Before you get to the fun analytics, you run straight into a wall of permissions, settings, and security requirements that aren’t always obvious if you’ve never done this before. The idea is to make your data life easier, but the first round can look anything but straightforward.Let’s talk through what really happens when you spin up Fabric and try to point it at Dataverse. Step one is always permissions—there’s no way around it. If you don’t have the right access on both sides, you’ll get stuck before you even see the connection screen. This isn’t just about having admin rights in Fabric, or being a Power Platform admin. You need both, working in tandem. And on the Dataverse side, it’s not just “are you an owner”—it’s “do you have the weird, camel-case security role that gives data access, and did someone check the right box in Azure?” It’s amazing how often this single step turns into a game of ping-pong between IT and business owners.Most admins, especially the first time, treat the process like connecting Power BI to SharePoint—something you can point and click your way through in under five minutes. But as soon as they try to pull a set of Dataverse tables, the access denied errors start rolling in. Sometimes Fabric tells you straight out, other times it’s buried in a vague authentication prompt. Real talk: I once watched a project lead with full Fabric workspace admin rights spend an entire morning wrestling with Dataflows, only to discover she didn’t have Dataverse “System Customizer” access. She was blocked at every turn, and the only hint she got was a tiny error message that pointed to a missing privilege buried in a security group, set years ago by someone who doesn’t even work at the company anymore.The tricky part is, Microsoft’s documentation doesn’t just hand you a checklist. It throws a small novel at you—environment permissions, Power Platform admin rights, multifactor authentication, and explicit consent prompts—each with their own nested documentation links. It feels like walking through a bureaucratic obstacle course with pop-up quizzes about least privilege models. Even if you think you’ve covered the basics, there’s always a new, deeply technical checkbox lurking in the Azure portal, just waiting to trip things up.So here’s how it actually plays out: you log into Fabric, prep a new Dataflow or pipeline, and kick off the process of linking Dataverse. Immediately, you’ll get prompted to authenticate—usually with your Microsoft 365 work account. If your Fabric workspace doesn’t have the right permissions in Dataverse’s environment, or vice versa, the process halts instantly. Sometimes Fabric will suggest you re-authenticate, sometimes it’ll pass you over to Power Platform admin centers for additional setup, and sometimes it’ll just give you a generic “something went wrong.”Even once you’ve sorted out the account side, you need to grant Fabric permission to access specific Dataverse environments. That means you’re navigating both the Fabric workspace roles—typically contributor or higher—and the Dataverse security group that manages table-level access. At this phase, a lot of teams run face-first into missing environment permissions. Fabric might be perfectly set up on your end, but unless the Dataverse environment admin has allowed external data flows, you’re still out in the cold.Configuring the actual “Dataver

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

What if you could hand off invoice approvals in Dynamics 365 without lifting a finger—and know your leads and cases are always routed to the right team? This isn’t wishful thinking—it’s what you’ll learn to automate today, using Power Automate and Copilot. Let’s break down the system holding your business back, and see how a few smart triggers can connect your D365 modules, save hours, and finally let your team focus on the work that matters. Ready to rethink the way your workflows actually work?Why D365 Automation Still Feels DisconnectedIf you’ve ever built a workflow in D365 and wondered why things still slip through the cracks, you’re not alone. Most organizations use Power Automate to handle one process at a time—move a lead, assign a case, send out an approval—but those quick fixes start to pile up. You end up with a patchwork of rules, each living in its own silo. The result? Processes that technically “work,” but add friction of their own. The reality is, these isolated automations are like putting band-aids on plumbing leaks—you’re not solving the deeper issue, just shuffling work around and hoping it holds.Let’s talk about where these silos show up. You automate the lead assignment. The lead goes to the right rep, but now the sales ops team has to manually update the case status, since no trigger covers that handoff. Meanwhile, your finance team approves an invoice and assumes the system will handle the rest. In practice, payment reminders and updated payment statuses often lag behind—because the automation ends as soon as one step is complete. That’s time lost and opportunities missed, buried under all those “just one more” manual steps that keep people from focusing on their real jobs. If you picture your D365 environment as a set of islands, each automation lives on its own, with very few bridges between them.Now here’s the strange part—D365 was designed to connect your business, not keep it split apart. But most automations treat each module as a separate world. Why? Some of it is technical, but more often it’s about how teams set up their flows. Instead of seeing the system as a whole, they carve out workflows for just one business group or department. For example, cases get routed in Customer Service, but there’s no automatic sync with Sales if that customer suddenly changes status. Or a Payment Approved trigger in Finance doesn’t speak to the project ops team, leaving them guessing if they can start work. It’s like running a relay race where each runner hands off the baton—except here, nobody actually runs to meet you, so you have to walk the baton over yourself every time.If this sounds familiar, you’re in good company. According to recent user research, more than 60 percent of D365 users say their workflow automations don’t really help cut down manual tracking between business roles. It’s a bit like ordering same-day delivery, only to find out every item in your order is shipped separately, days apart—it was all supposed to arrive together, but instead, it makes more work for everyone. These gaps may not sound dramatic, but they stack up. Reminders to the finance team get lost. A customer case sits idle because sales never sees that the deal was approved. Maybe an invoice sits in limbo, waiting for a team that never even knew it was ready.The friction becomes even clearer when you look at the transfer points. Take lead assignment again. Sure, you’ve got a trigger that routes leads from Marketing to Sales, based on region or product interest. But what about the next step? Does that same flow update account managers? Does it ping the support team if there’s an open case? Often, the answer is no—so someone, somewhere, has a notepad or an Excel file just to keep track of what’s still outstanding. The promise of automation was to end this, but most setups stop right before the finish line.And here’s the result: teams end up with workarounds. Maybe you use Power Automate to shoot off an email when an invoice is paid, but you still need a manager to check a dashboard once a week “just in case.” Or you have a case closure notification, but it relies on a user remembering to press a button that was buried in training three years ago. This is about as efficient as a warehouse where every pallet requires five separate calls to move from loading dock to storage. You’re automating, but the system still leans on human intervention at each step.If you ask admins why they don’t connect more steps—linking Case, Sales, and Finance—they’ll point to complexity. System-wide automations, the kind that touch multiple modules and impact more than one team, start to look risky. One missed trigger and you could double-send an invoice, or update the wrong customer record. Even seasoned admins will tell you that sprawling flows feel fragile, and if they fail, the fix might take days. It’s much “safer” to automate in one place and hope for the best—even if it leaves gaps everywhere else.But there’s a real cost to playing it safe. Instead of freeing people up, disconnected automations just hide the manual work behind more emails, more spreadsheets, and more status meetings. The promise of a connected D365 environment is lost in translation. Ironically, it’s not the technology holding us back—it’s how we map out the workflow. Most teams don’t step back to consider the full process flow across every department or module. That’s where the biggest wins are hiding: in connecting the dots you didn’t realize were missing.So what happens if we stop automating one-off tasks and instead, actually map out how processes travel between modules? This is where both Power Automate and Copilot can start to untangle those hidden knots—if you know what to look for.Mapping the Friction: Where D365 Automation Breaks DownIf you’ve ever watched an invoice get approved in D365 and then just… sit there, you know exactly how frustrating real-world workflow gaps can be. The approval goes through. Everyone assumes the payment reminders will follow automatically, but nothing seems to move unless someone nudges it along. Suddenly, the finance team is answering emails about late reminders, and your customer service reps are wondering if they’re working with stale data. The approvals are technically in the system, but the next steps fall back into old habits—someone has to toggle between modules, send manual updates, or kick off emails from memory. That “single pane of glass” D365 promises feels more like a window that only opens halfway.Let’s talk about why these missed connections happen. Picture your D365 invoice approval flow. It starts with Sales—maybe someone closes a deal, and that triggers an invoice creation. Then it moves to Finance, where the invoice gets reviewed and marked as approved. After that, what’s supposed to happen? Ideally, payment reminders go out to customers, payment status updates sync up in every relevant module, and maybe Project Ops starts work if this was a billable job. The reality? At each stage, there’s usually a handoff between modules, and those don’t always map to anything automated. Instead, it’s a patchwork of “people remember to do X when Y happens,” even if there’s no system rule to enforce it.That leads to the trickiest part: the friction isn’t always where you expect. Sometimes the problem is painfully obvious—maybe you missed a trigger, or your workflow ends with a single approval but doesn’t carry information forward. Other times, the pain is subtle. D365 modules like Sales, Finance, and Operations all store similar data, but little differences in record status or naming throw off automations. You get inconsistent results, or updates that never cross module lines. The underlying issue isn’t that triggers don’t exist—it’s that they’re set up for one team, by one admin, without a real map of how the whole process should flow. Everyone makes assumptions about who does what after the handoff, and automation just falls back on manual reminders and spreadsheets to pick up the slack.Here’s a scenario that comes up all the time: An invoice gets approved in D365 Finance. The finance team is done. But over in customer service or sales ops, nobody sees the update instantly—there’s no automatic handoff to tell them it’s time to follow up with the customer. So, what happens? The customer waits. Maybe your team waits even longer while status gets updated manually in two or three different places. This is the kind of gap where things just drift—everyone thinks the system is handling it, but it’s not connecting the dots between departments.This isn’t just one or two organizations getting it wrong, either. Audits of real D365 environments keep turning up the same thing: more than 40% of approval workflows have hidden manual steps sitting right in the middle. Not at the end, not at the edge cases. They’re baked into the standard operating procedure, even after years of “automation.” Most of us are used to this by now—someone has a sticky note, or a recurring Outlook task, just to make sure what should be automatic doesn’t get lost in the shuffle. The silent delays start to look like background noise, until suddenly you’re fielding complaints about slow follow-ups or missing payments, and it all traces back to a missing bridge between steps.Imagine D365 as a subway map for your business. Each workflow is a train line; every handoff between modules is a transfer station. If every connection is smooth, the trains run on time, passengers get where they need to go. Miss a connection, though, and everything backs up. Delays become the norm, not the exception. You might not notice which transfer slowed things down, but your staff will feel the impact—chasing down approvals, cross-referencing data, or stopping to check for things that should already be in sync.Most integration pain isn’t about the sexy edge cases or show-off automations—it’s buried in those daily handoffs. Assigning a lead from Marketing to Sales sounds easy, until y

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.