<a target="_blank" href="https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_sms">Send us a text</a>Held: Parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Read by Jeff  Barnum.

Send us a text Held: Parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Read by Jeff Barnum.

<a href="https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_sms" rel="noopener noreferrer">Send us a text</a>Held: Parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction.&nbsp;Read by Jeff&nbsp; Barnum.&nbsp;

Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out)

Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients.&nbsp; *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

News

Education

Government

Politics

Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients.  *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

Share Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out)

Sign up to save your podcasts

Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out)

Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out)

More shows like Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

The Ben Shapiro Show

Masters in Business

The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond

Pod Save America

The Daily

The Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast: Pass the Bar Exam with Less Stress

The Charlie Kirk Show

Strict Scrutiny

5-4

Immigration Review

Divided Argument