
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
IUL and whole-life policies both have their place. Whole-life advocates prefer it because your cash value is guaranteed to increase each and every year as the IUL has growth that is tied to the upward movement of a stock market index.
The downside to the IUL is that down years do happen, and in those years you get credited a zero but still have the expenses associated with the IUL.
David goes through a scenario where all premiums within a LIRP go to the IUL’s fixed account. By allocating money in this way, you will net a consistent rate of return that is not linked to the upward movement of a stock market index, even during a down year.
By allocating your premiums to your IUL’s fixed account, you can recreate all the attributes of the whole-life policy inside the IUL, only on a supercharged basis.
To discover the companies that David used to model this scenario, email him at [email protected]
The scenario takes a 40-year-old male contributing $20,000 per year until the age of 65. In either model, the factors were averaged out to make the comparison as fair as possible.
Starting with the whole-life policy, at age 66 it produced a loan of $42,675 every year until the age of 100. That is cumulative distributions of $1,493,625.
The IUL is able to produce a loan of $48,084 every year until the age of 100, with cumulative distributions of $1,683,940.
If you are just comparing maximum loans on the backend, the IUL comes out on top.
Whole-life policies do not have guaranteed zero-percent loan provisions which is one of the reasons that policy lags behind.
With that being said, you wouldn’t want to use an IUL for its fixed account.
Using a slightly different model, the benefit of the IUL races ahead considerably.
At 7% growth, the loan value jumps to $100,100 and the cumulative distributions go to $3,503,500.
By allocating your premiums to the fixed account inside of a maximum funded IUL, you can generate more income than you would inside a maximum funded whole-life policy.
By taking a little more risk in your IUL and tying the growth of your cash-value to the growth of a stock market index up to a cap, you can more than double your annual tax-free distributions.
Mentioned in this episode:
David's books: Power of Zero, Look Before You LIRP, The Volatility Shield, Tax-Free Income for Life and The Infinity Code
DavidMcKnight.com
DavidMcKnightBooks.com
PowerOfZero.com (free video series)
@mcknightandco on Twitter
@davidcmcknight on Instagram
David McKnight on YouTube
Get David's Tax-free Tool Kit at taxfreetoolkit.com
4.6
137137 ratings
IUL and whole-life policies both have their place. Whole-life advocates prefer it because your cash value is guaranteed to increase each and every year as the IUL has growth that is tied to the upward movement of a stock market index.
The downside to the IUL is that down years do happen, and in those years you get credited a zero but still have the expenses associated with the IUL.
David goes through a scenario where all premiums within a LIRP go to the IUL’s fixed account. By allocating money in this way, you will net a consistent rate of return that is not linked to the upward movement of a stock market index, even during a down year.
By allocating your premiums to your IUL’s fixed account, you can recreate all the attributes of the whole-life policy inside the IUL, only on a supercharged basis.
To discover the companies that David used to model this scenario, email him at [email protected]
The scenario takes a 40-year-old male contributing $20,000 per year until the age of 65. In either model, the factors were averaged out to make the comparison as fair as possible.
Starting with the whole-life policy, at age 66 it produced a loan of $42,675 every year until the age of 100. That is cumulative distributions of $1,493,625.
The IUL is able to produce a loan of $48,084 every year until the age of 100, with cumulative distributions of $1,683,940.
If you are just comparing maximum loans on the backend, the IUL comes out on top.
Whole-life policies do not have guaranteed zero-percent loan provisions which is one of the reasons that policy lags behind.
With that being said, you wouldn’t want to use an IUL for its fixed account.
Using a slightly different model, the benefit of the IUL races ahead considerably.
At 7% growth, the loan value jumps to $100,100 and the cumulative distributions go to $3,503,500.
By allocating your premiums to the fixed account inside of a maximum funded IUL, you can generate more income than you would inside a maximum funded whole-life policy.
By taking a little more risk in your IUL and tying the growth of your cash-value to the growth of a stock market index up to a cap, you can more than double your annual tax-free distributions.
Mentioned in this episode:
David's books: Power of Zero, Look Before You LIRP, The Volatility Shield, Tax-Free Income for Life and The Infinity Code
DavidMcKnight.com
DavidMcKnightBooks.com
PowerOfZero.com (free video series)
@mcknightandco on Twitter
@davidcmcknight on Instagram
David McKnight on YouTube
Get David's Tax-free Tool Kit at taxfreetoolkit.com
435 Listeners
770 Listeners
732 Listeners
1,276 Listeners
487 Listeners
505 Listeners
559 Listeners
184 Listeners
882 Listeners
331 Listeners
777 Listeners
149 Listeners
526 Listeners
714 Listeners
163 Listeners