
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On March 18, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Murthy v. Missouri. This case is likely to have a major impact on free expression online as the Court attempts to distinguish between lawful government engagement with social media companies as opposed to illegal government coercion or “jawboning.”
Having just listened to the debate before the Court, this panel will examine the underlying issues of government censorship by proxy and what occurred during oral arguments. The panel will also discuss the impact this case could have on online speech and how the courts and policymakers can meaningfully address such censorship.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Cato Institute4.5
115115 ratings
On March 18, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Murthy v. Missouri. This case is likely to have a major impact on free expression online as the Court attempts to distinguish between lawful government engagement with social media companies as opposed to illegal government coercion or “jawboning.”
Having just listened to the debate before the Court, this panel will examine the underlying issues of government censorship by proxy and what occurred during oral arguments. The panel will also discuss the impact this case could have on online speech and how the courts and policymakers can meaningfully address such censorship.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

973 Listeners

2,835 Listeners

4,261 Listeners

2,451 Listeners

2,273 Listeners

693 Listeners

29 Listeners

1,509 Listeners

626 Listeners

987 Listeners

717 Listeners

90 Listeners

2,012 Listeners

742 Listeners

688 Listeners

1,065 Listeners

95 Listeners