Things you’ll need to know

A sneak peak of the storyline and character concepts for the game

kids should be respected

Invincible ignorance of perpetrator, coupled with victim keeping it bottled up inside of them, make up for an inverted understanding of Christs’ love for children. Let’s not let it happen here!

John Jay report, how perpetrators condition kids using psychologically tactics (ex: Pavlov’s dog theory)

I made a miscalculation in the podcast…sorry, here is the correct one:

0.26% of 798 priests in toronto = 2 pedophile priests (not 3)

So statistically speaking, within the span of 50 years you will have 2 priests that are pedophiles having been transfered to different parishes within the diocese whenever they are rightfully suspected of their crime, but never get jail time although are guilty. If we don’t include these 2, there will also be a 3rd pedophile that gets jail time.

conditioning the psychological freedom of invincibly ignorant people creates the environment/circumstances within the community of the faithful to inadvertently ignore the cry of the children, that is, the poor children being victims of pedophiles now!

Adopting St. Alphonses Legorio’s teaching on invincible ignorance, as finding it a valid pastoral approach to omit teaching a penitent in friendship with God the awareness of an act that they are currently doing as being sinful, due to the assumption that if it is believed that the penitent would become aware that his act is a sin would still do the act and therefore formally mortally sin (because he isn’t ready to follow that rule as of yet due to immaturity in faith as of yet), could be the reason why pedophilia continues to remain systematic within the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It could be that Bishops don’t find these priest culpable of their pedophilia acts due to the invincible ignorance that it is a sin

In highlighting the text, as seen in the video, I pinpoint the principle teaching that I believe Bishops adopt from St. Alphonsus Liguori to make decisions to council pedophile priests to remain in invincible ignorance that their acts against their victims are not only evil but produce grave evil consequences.

Internal vs External Forum - Making distinctions between the two help us understand that not living up to the sacramental signs of matrimony that are meant to reflect the love of Christ for his Church, does not necessarily mean that a rupture with friendship with God (mortal sin) has occurred.

Also, if I may add, matrimony between one man and one women as a visible sign of our faith in the Trinity as another example of the external forum giving witness to our faith in the Triune God, if unable to be witnessed may not necessarily mean the mentioned couple is in a state of mortal sin.

This distinction between the Internal & External forum is necessary to understand the distribution of priest from one parish to another after they are accused of pedophilia, regardless of if they are guilty or not.

Adopting St. Alphonses Legorio’s teaching on invincible ignorance, as finding it a valid pastoral approach to omit teaching a penitent in friendship with God the awareness of an act that they are currently doing as being sinful, due to the assumption that if it is believed that the penitent would become aware that his act is a sin would still do the act and therefore formally mortally sin (because he isn’t ready to follow that rule as of yet due to immaturity in faith as of yet), could be the reason why pedophilia continues to remain systematic within the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It could be that Bishops don’t find these priest culpable of their pedophilia acts due to the invincible ignorance that it is a sin