
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Prologue Projects4.5
34723,472 ratings
Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

3,170 Listeners

3,917 Listeners

15,679 Listeners

21,921 Listeners

3,358 Listeners

2,068 Listeners

5,797 Listeners

2,739 Listeners

16,859 Listeners

442 Listeners

9,409 Listeners

571 Listeners

2,604 Listeners

308 Listeners

308 Listeners