
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Prologue Projects4.5
34583,458 ratings
Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

3,523 Listeners

1,583 Listeners

3,907 Listeners

21,866 Listeners

3,331 Listeners

2,056 Listeners

5,803 Listeners

2,712 Listeners

16,606 Listeners

440 Listeners

377 Listeners

9,357 Listeners

503 Listeners

2,498 Listeners

309 Listeners