In this compelling episode of the Guardian Mindset Podcast, Attorney Eric Daigle returns to further explore the intricate concept of duty of care in law enforcement, with a special focus on the public duty doctrine. Building on the foundations laid in our previous episode, this discussion delves deeper, intertwining legal theory with human perspectives to offer a comprehensive understanding of law enforcement responsibilities.

We begin by examining the delicate balance law enforcement officers must maintain in differentiating between subjects and suspects in both non-criminal and criminal situations. This episode takes a close look at landmark legal cases such as South vs Maryland, Warren vs District of Columbia, and Shaney vs Winnebago County, dissecting their impact on the duty of care in the field of law enforcement.

Our conversation then shifts to the complex interplay between the legal and moral duties of care for officers, especially when dealing with individuals who are incapacitated or suffering from mental health issues. Attorney Daigle provides insights into the challenges and potential liabilities officers face in their tactical decision-making processes.

A crucial part of this episode is dedicated to clarifying the often misunderstood distinction between a 'suspect' and a 'subject', and why grasping this difference is essential for law enforcement professionals. We wrap up the discussion by underlining the importance of protecting and assisting those in need, while simultaneously ensuring the safety of all parties involved.

Tune in for an enlightening session that not only sheds light on the legalities but also humanizes the complex decisions faced by law enforcement officers daily. Join us as we navigate these challenging yet vital issues that are fundamental to the role of every law enforcement officer.